• 4 minutes What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 8 minutes EU Confirms Trade Retaliation Measures vs. U.S. To Take Effect on June 22
  • 17 minutes Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 11 hours Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 21 hours Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
  • 20 mins Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 19 mins Corruption On The Top: Netanyahu's Wife Charged With Misuse of Public Funds for Meals
  • 6 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 2 hours Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 3 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 2 hours U.S. Withdraws From U.N. Human Rights Council
  • 6 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 11 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 6 hours OPEC Meeting Could End Without Decision - Irony Note Added from OPEC Children's Book
  • 4 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 5 hours "The Gasoline Car Is a Car With a Future"
  • 17 hours EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 1 day WE Solutions plans to print cars
  • 5 hours Sell out now or hold on?
Alt Text

Goldman: Expect Another Bull Run In Oil

While oil prices are tumbling,…

Alt Text

Was This Just A Temporary Pullback In Oil?

Technical analysis shows that despite…

Alt Text

Iran: Oil Prices Could Jump To $140 On U.S. Sanctions

Iran’s OPEC governor Hossein Kazempour…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Why Oil Prices Might Not Rebound Until 2019

Shell Rig

It’s a safe bet that investors are getting increasingly tired of all the conflicting forecasts about oil and gas prices. Some argue that oil is heading back to $20 thanks to the continuing excess supply. Others claim that the excess is overestimated and crude is well on its way to reach $80 or more by the end of the year. The likely truth, as usual, is somewhere in the middle, at least for the time being.

But according to energy consultants Douglas-Westwood, prices will remain where they are now until about 2019, when offshore oil production will finally peak. The company’s analysts list 15 large-scale offshore projects that are to blame, including Iran’s South Pars field, Brazil’s Lula in the pre-salt layer of the Santos Basin, and Mexico’s Tsimin-Xux. These three alone are projected to yield a combined 1.617 million barrels per day in 2017.

To put this in perspective, global crude oil consumption next year is seen by the EIA to rise by 1.5 million bpd, to 96.78 million bpd, versus estimated total production of 96.79 million bpd.

Gas production is set for accelerated growth as well, thanks to projects such as Gorgon and Wheatstone off the Australian coast as well as supply expansion in the Middle East, most notably in Iran and Qatar, and a host of LNG projects springing up in the U.S and elsewhere. LNG in particular could lead to a prolonged price depression for the commodity, as virtually every country that has any gas reserves will be pushing for a piece of the pie.

At the same time, however, Douglas-Westwood analysts note that a lot of offshore projects have been canceled. It’s just that the effects of these cancellations on overall production will not be felt before 2019. After that, E&Ps will have another problem to deal with: ramping up falling production after axing more than 350,000 jobs and cutting investments to the core.

Add to this the production equipment that’s been idled for years, and the oil and gas industry may well be facing another crisis. Related: Algeria Plans To Boost Oil Output By 30%

There seems to be no way out of this vicious circle. E&Ps are currently prioritizing dividends and cash flow, which means they cannot afford to shelve too many projects, especially since they had already invested so much in them prior to the price downturn. As of March this year, Big Oil had already cancelled as much as $270 billion in projects, data from Rystad Energy shows.

What’s more, E&Ps need their offshore existing projects for two reasons: reserve replacement rates and new offshore drilling regulations. Thanks to the price downturn, the ratio of reserve replacement for the world’s biggest oil companies has fallen to multi-year lows. In fact, new oil discoveries last year were the lowest since 1952. This is a potentially big problem because oil and gas are, after all, non-renewable energy sources.

New regulations from the U.S. government, on the other hand, have made new offshore exploration more expensive. The new regulations, first released in April and supplemented recently with a set of specific rules concerning Arctic drilling, aim to reduce the environmental risks associated with offshore hydrocarbon exploration.

So, oil and gas producers are facing higher production costs for offshore drilling as well as a workforce shortage in a few years. In such a situation, their only reasonable course of action is getting the most out of what they have. The prolonged glut is an unavoidable side effect of this course of action.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News