• 20 mins Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 4 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 5 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 7 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 8 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 10 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 11 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 17 hours Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 22 hours British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 1 day Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 1 day Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 1 day Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 1 day OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 1 day London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 1 day Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 1 day Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 2 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 2 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 3 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 3 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 3 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 3 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 3 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 3 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 3 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 3 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 4 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 4 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 4 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 4 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 7 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
Alt Text

Mass EV Adoption Could Lead To $10 Oil

As the adoption of electric…

Alt Text

Goldman Sachs: Inventory Drawdowns Will Not Continue

Goldman Sachs has reported that…

Peter Tertzakian

Peter Tertzakian

Peter is an economist, investment strategist, author and public speaker on issues vital to the future of energy. He has clocked over 30 years of…

More Info

Why Oil Could Head Back To $90 Sooner Than Thought

Anadarko oil rig

I don’t know much about fashion, but I have heard that blue is the new black. And I know that by the time I buy blue, everyone else will be wearing green.

In the oil business, modish pundits are now pronouncing, “60 is the new 90,” championing the thesis that productivity gains, cost improvements and price wars have pulled the global clearing price of oil to $60/B, down from $90/B a couple of years ago.

The oilfields of the world share some similarity to fashion ateliers.

Designers in Paris and New York collude every fall to convince us all to wear new colours in the spring. Meanwhile, innovators in Houston and cartel leaders in Vienna claim that $60 a barrel is the new, long-term marginal cost of oil. As a result, a $90-per-barrel breakeven cost has become about as appealing to an oil investor as a wide necktie to a millennial.

Here’s the thing: Not everyone looks good in blue and not all producers have the rocks, expertise and infrastructure to make their financial statements look good at $60 a barrel.

Behind the scenes, the oil industry has become more discerning in its own way.

If there is one new style that’s obvious it’s that “short-cycle” investing is the new “long cycle.” In other words, smaller capital outlays, faster payback and more certain returns have become de rigour for oil and gas investing. No more multi-billion-dollar, decade-plus projects that are subject to the long-term vagaries of geopolitics, the threat of expropriation, corruption, civil war, policy uncertainty or outright obsolescence.

Like a traditional navy suit, investing in short-cycle projects is a fad that’s unlikely to end soon. Premier American oil fields like the Permian, Eagle Ford and Bakken are conducive to drilling when the trading screen flashes $60 in New York. So too are equivalent Canadian oil plays that are becoming trendy. Related: Texas Is Making An Energy Recovery

More of the world’s oil resources are in vogue too at $60/B, more than there was two years ago. “Half-cycle”, partially developed projects with easily accessible infrastructure can be in business at $60 or less. And cheap Middle Eastern oil never goes out of style – although the above-ground social costs are necessities that can make a barrel considerably more expensive.

But this is all just theory in a world that is largely running on excess oil inventories.

There isn’t any field-tested evidence to suggest that there are enough short-cycle, $60 projects to satisfy our world’s near 100-million-barrel-a-day appetite over the next several years. What is certain is that the geography of places where under $60 works is not as great as where $90 used to work.

From a free-market perspective, it’s long been noted that about 80 percent of the world’s oil resides under state-controlled oil regimes. Twenty percent exists in places like the United States, Canada and the North Sea. Of that 20 percent, a significant portion was of the long-cycle variety, for example big oil sands and frontier Arctic projects. So, the set of investible opportunities is geographically and financially much narrower than it used to be, at least for now. Admittedly, the 80/20 ratio could become less skewed as new processes open up greater quantities of “unconventional” oil in places like Argentina, Mexico, Russia and China. However, North America is almost a decade further up the learning curve after drilling and completing tens of thousands of wells. Other regions have long-term promise for sure, but it will take considerable time to replicate the U.S. experience in a sub-$60/B price environment. Related: Why Permian Prices Will Keep Breaking Records

Once the oil storage glut clears, producing companies will need to ratchet up their upstream spending. Several hundred billion dollars must be invested over the next few years to bring oil out of the ground from a far more concentrated set of opportunities. And that looks problematic when looking at the historically high correlation between oil price – hence cash flow and investment – and costs (see Figure 1). Piling into North American tight oil plays, or even some new ones abroad like Argentina, has high potential to over-capitalize concentrated areas and drive costs much higher. Land prices in many potentially sub-$60 plays are already inflating quickly.

(Click to enlarge)

All of this is to say that $60 may be the new $90, but only until such time as everyone strips the rack of $60 opportunities, driving costs up again. Then just like cycles in the fashion business, the oil industry might be wearing $90 again.

But all of this fashion lingo is just talk right now. The price of oil hasn’t shown $60 yet. The industry is still wearing a skimpy 50 bucks a barrel.

By Peter Tertzakian for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Prashanta on October 19 2016 said:
    Hm. I could really benefit from an investment point of view if oil prices were to rise but the fashion argument is rather weak.
  • Clyde on October 20 2016 said:
    Sounds like this writer will rah rah oil to $250.
  • JHM on October 20 2016 said:
    I like the short cycle / long cycle distinction. The worry is that we may not see a long cycle again. The problem is that if EVs grow 50% annually, oil demand peaks about 2025. After that, the value of untapped oil reserves drops rapidly, even to zero. So if you are sitting on a 70 year (R/P) reserve, your balance sheet is destroyed within 20 years. You forfeit about 70% of the current value of your reserves. So in this scenario, you are highly motivated today to increase production as much as possible. You want to liquidate your reserves as quickly as you can afford to do so.

    This is how the EV transition impacts the oil market right now, even though the market share of EVs is still quite small. It is the mere expectation of EVs that drives liquidation and oversupply of the market. Many investors ignore or dismiss this, but with each passing year EVs will advance and it will become increasingly clear to everyone. So the pressure to liquidate will only increase, regardless when peak oil demand actually occurs. Moreover, high oil prices will only serve to accelerate that transition to EVs. If you game this out, you really do not want oil to get above $60/b.

    The glut can persist until demand begins to fall. So there is not assurance of a long cycle.
  • zorro6204 on October 20 2016 said:
    Once the oil glut clears . . . but what if it never does? There's nothing on the horizon that shows production will be coming down anywhere that matters. The Saudi's are still deploying rigs, the Russians are planning on increasing production in 2017, US production has hit a high plateau, there will be more Canadian oil due to projects already in progress, and Libya, Nigeria and Iran are not subject any OPEC "cut" (which isn't a cut). The Nigerians are complaining about a "huge" cargo overhang in the market.

    I just don't see it, seems to me by 2020 it could be worse. Spending for big project oil is dead because we don't need it. Chevron is relying on 3-5,000 wells in the Permian that perform at $50-60. Statoil has that cap on new projects, and ConocoPhillips has abandoned deep sea projects altogether.
  • Noah on October 20 2016 said:
    Hi Peter,

    Your thesis is right when $60 opportunities to produce are unavailable, supply will slow down and prices will rise.

    However The United States will not be cutting production any time soon with the cost of producing a well around $40/barrel.

    If OPEC actually does cut any production, and maybe they, maybe they won't. With any significant rise in prices, U.S. Companies will gladly increase production since drilling a new well to production takes a week.
  • Andrew Butter on October 22 2016 said:
    Nice - for now no-one is looking long cycle except perhaps ARAMCO who are spending a bunch of money on brown field "maintaining production", I'm running shallow water lift boats there, very sweet. The price it makes sense to got full-stream after shale (not Permian) is the margin, I'm still convinced that needs minimum $90 to rip; Permian new production is now back to the 2014 peak, but the other tight-oil plays (i.e shale oil - Permian is not shale it's just tight), are still at 30% of the peak, and "new" is less than legacy loss. You might like to look out for the post I'm going to put about that on Oilpro and Seeking Alpha; OilPrice.com don't return my mails, obviously they are too high class to want to listen to someone who predicted this fiasco in 2011.
  • Ronald C Wagner on October 23 2016 said:
    So why would it skip seventy and eighty dollars per barrel plateaus?
  • IRVEN LIU on October 31 2016 said:
    I don't think so.....oil price is going to $30 soon.
  • Hank on December 24 2016 said:
    Anybody that thinks of oil going up any time soon must remember 1 thing.

    Foreign oil run by governments could absolutely bankrupt any huge outlay of capital to explore or drill.

  • Tim on January 02 2017 said:
    A Canadian giving advice on oil price. That would be like a West Texas cowboy talking women's fashion. US producers have a lot of wells that were drilled, but not fracked. They are just waiting for prices to raise. Additionally US well turns (time for a rig to set to the time it is done drilling), when from 30 or so days down to 6 day. Additionally, many of the leases must be drilled within a certain period of time to retain rights. So any significant increase in price will be met with a surge of US production. Drilling a deep water well takes 8-10 years. Fracking will produce within 20-30 days.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News