• 1 day PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 1 day Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 1 day Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 1 day Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 1 day Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 1 day Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 2 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 5 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Kent Moors

Kent Moors

Dr. Kent Moors is an internationally recognized expert in oil and natural gas policy, risk management, emerging market economic development, and market risk assessment. His…

More Info

Oil Prices May Hit $60 By End Of 2017

Oil

As it turned out, my predictions of where prices would end up by the end of September were spot on.

And now, we’re entering a period of rather narrow trading in oil prices.

I continue to see the price of crude slowly move up in what I’ve called a “ratcheting” pattern here before.

What that means is that the overall price trend points in a single direction (in this case up), but there are occasional moves the other way.

Now, as I write this late on Tuesday morning, WTI (West Texas Intermediate, the benchmark crude rate for futures contracts written in New York) sits at $50.42 a barrel, down marginally by $0.18.

WTI did succumb to some profit taking yesterday after an exceptionally strong run up 12.2 percent for the month through September 28.

Brent (the other, and more widely used, global benchmark set daily in London) has had a similar performance – currently at $56.08, virtually flat for the day, after profit taking yesterday that followed from prices spiking 12.4 percent for the same month through September 28.

I remain consistent (and proven right by the past 18-24 months) in saying that the market price of oil is dictated by the floor of the pricing range, not the ceiling.

That will always dictate the true direction of price moves.

We’re now likely to experience some resistance at just north of $52 a barrel for WTI. That means there will be some narrow-range pricing until a breakthrough up or down takes place. Related: Activist Investors Crack Down On Shale CEO Salaries

My money these days is for the movement to continue higher. Let me show you why…

As well as give you my next set of oil price predictions – this time for the end of the year…

Oil Markets are Being Manipulated

That move higher will happen if the true, underlying market factors are allowed to dictate the price of oil.

Unfortunately, as you’ve seen me explain here before, there are still many oil market players who prefer to manipulatively (and artificially) influence crude markets.

They try this after every major move up in oil prices.

What they do is attempt to create a mindset among investors that the price is about to implode.

The reason is simple: These guys make money only by running shorts, and shorts require that bids move down to make money.

Of course, there’s nothing wrong with shorts as such.

They are a useful way to restrain unjustified movements up in either individual stocks or larger market sectors. They offset the “irrational exuberance” that markets sometimes get caught up in.

It’s only when the short acts as a device to manipulate genuine market prices that the practice comes into question.

Take a simple short example.

Say you’re convinced that a stock, let’s call it “ABC,” is heading down from its current price of $10 a share.

What you do is borrow ABC shares from a broker and immediately sell them.

Later, you turn out to be right and ABC’s stock price falls down to $8.

So you go back into the market, buy the ABC shares back, and return them to the broker.

But because you sold them for $10 per share, and bought them back for just $8 per share, you made $2 per share on the whole transaction (minus any borrowing fees from your broker).

The same applies to not only stocks, but contracts and other financial instruments.

Of course, there’s a major downside to shorts.

If you’re wrong, and shares move up, there’s theoretically no limit to how much money you can lose. If the underlying commodity (share or contract) starts shooting up in price, you still have to go back into the market and buy them, to return them to your broker.

To reuse our ABC example, suppose that instead of falling from $10 to $8 per share, the stock shot up to $1,000 per share. Well, your broker would still be calling you up, asking to get their shares back.

So even though you made just $10 per share selling the shares, now you have to go back into the market and pay $1,000 per share to get them back, so your broker can have what’s his.

In this case, the spread between what you received when you sold the borrowed shares initially and what you now need to spend to buy them back is a widening loss.

So shorting – whether for a good reason, or as speculation – is very dangerous.

Related: Supermajors Prepare For A Permian Bidding War

And those who engineer huge shorts must do three things to be successful.

Shorting is Very Dangerous for the Shorter

First, they have to move on a wide front involving a large number of plays.

Second, they will use an extensive array of options to serve as insurance to offset rapid movement in the underlying stock or commodity.

Third, they will need to convince a broad base of investors that the pricing decline is significant.

The more they can persuade on this last point, the greater is their profit from the spread. Because as the rest of the market starts selling, the short-artist’s spread widens, and so do his profits.

At this point, these actors race onto TV, give their version of Chicken Little from “The Sky is Falling” brokerage, and run right off the set to the bank.

Such manipulation aims at broad-based investor attitudes, not on the underlying market fundamentals.

These latter aspects will be cherry-picked by the “analyst” to emphasize a collapse in price, usually with some prognostication of prices moving down to the low $40s per barrel or even below.

The real object becomes those who are cutting oil futures contracts.

If futures traders see a big price change coming, they must hedge their bets and will set contract prices at the perceived highest cost for the next available barrel (when prices look set to rise) or the least expensive cost for the next available barrel (when the short artists make their money and are driving prices down).

But for the rest of us, the real objective is to have oil prices set by what the market is telling us, not by what the short artists want.

Despite the tug of war between the two, that’s slowly starting to happen.

Here’s Why Oil is Heading Up Anyway

The primary restraints to prices going up even more are (supposedly):

-“declining” global oil demand

-a “flood” of new crude production

-the ineffectiveness of the OPEC-Russia agreement to cap oil production

But the International Energy Agency (IEA), the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), and OPEC all agree that demand has been growing.

In fact, all three have reported in recent weeks that the balance between supply and demand is arriving quicker than anticipated. We’ll end 2017 at the highest daily demand level in history.

Second, there’s definitely plenty of excess extractable volume worldwide, especially with the largess in shale and tight oil now available for pumping in the U.S.

Now, this oil in the ground will prevent prices from a medium-term race back up to the $100 a barrel range.

However, while it will discourage the most diehard believer in long-term, triple-digit oil pricing, it has no genuine effect on the current price unless it is actually lifted.

And there, restraint has taken over in the oil patch.

Finally, OPEC and main non-cartel producers (primarily Russia) will extend the production caps into next year.

Yes, there is some over-production beyond quotas.

But this is going to be offset by a continuing decline in Venezuelan production, along with intermittent interruptions in both Libya and Nigeria.

Mexico’s production malaise is also a factor.

That’s why, wishful thinking by manipulators notwithstanding, we are beginning to see a rebalanced market and an upward push on oil prices.

So my new oil price predictions, for the end of 2017, are as follows…

Here’s Where Oil Will Be by the End of the Year

I expect WTI to be at $55-$57 a barrel by the end of the year. Brent will be at $58-$60.

These are small improvements from current pricing levels. But the prospects of continued rises remain. If we are at these quite attainable prices by the end of 2017, we should see low $60s for both benchmarks in the first quarter of 2018.

By Kent Moors  

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Jonathan Pulliam on October 06 2017 said:
    Kent could add:

    a.) "Inauspiciously Trump-timed sales of crude from the United States' Strategic Petroleum Reserve on the part of the U.S. government."

    b.) The moribund economic recovery in the U.S. has auto sales ex-Toyota for 2017 BELOW 2016 numbers. Doh.

    c.) Trump has done little if anything to mitigate effects of the VW dieselgate scandal on the auto market in the U.S.

    d.) Libya, a jihadist-controlled swing producer is manifestly un-stable, de-stabilized, and a certifiably failed state.

    e.) OPEC reaped non-compliance from its members on account of the Anti-Qatar instigated by the ISIS-funding OPEC-pivot Saudis.
  • Clyde Boyd on October 06 2017 said:
    My prediction is that experts will continue to predict that the price of oil will increase even though their past predictions of this have never materialized. Moreover, the supply actually is increasing and eventually opec cheating will essentially negate that artificial attempt to increase prices.

    See, even a non expert like me can make predictions. and I dont even own any oil stocks or are otherwise dependent on the oil industry for my living.
  • j.c. on October 08 2017 said:
    2018... still rebalancing
    2019 ... still rebalancing
    2020 ... still rebalancing.
    2021 ... too many EVs, never will rebalance.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News