• 4 minutes Is The Three Gorges Dam on the Brink of Collapse?
  • 8 minutes The Coal Industry May Never Recover From The Pandemic
  • 11 minutes China Raids Bank and Investor Accounts
  • 25 mins In a Nutshell...
  • 19 hours Is OilPrice a cover for Green Propganda
  • 33 mins During March, April, May the states with the highest infections/deaths were NY, NJ, Ma. . . . . Today (June) the three have the best numbers. How ? Herd immunity ?
  • 2 hours Putin Paid Militants to Kill US Troops
  • 23 hours Victor Davis Hansen on Biden's mental acuity " . . unfit to serve". With 1 out of 5 Democrats admitting it. How many Dem's believe it but will not admit it?
  • 6 hours Putin Forever: Russians Given Money As Vote That Could Extend Putin's Rule Draws To A Close
  • 22 hours Tesla Model 3 police cars pay for themselves faster than expected, says police chief
  • 20 mins Why Wind is pitiful for most regions on earth
  • 8 hours Happy 4th of July!
  • 6 hours Apology Accepted!
  • 1 day The Political Genius of Donald Trump
  • 2 days Why Oil could hit $100
  • 2 days Biden admits he has been tested for Cognitive Decline several times. Didn't show any proof of test results.
  • 2 days Per most popular Indian websites it was Indian troops not Chinese troops breach of LAC that caused the clashes. If you know any Indian media that claim to the contrary please provide the link
UAE: Output Cuts Will Send Oil Prices To ‘Normal’ Levels

UAE: Output Cuts Will Send Oil Prices To ‘Normal’ Levels

The ongoing record production cuts…

Oil May Never Hit $100 Again

Oil May Never Hit $100 Again

There are now a number…

Citigroup: Oil Will Never Return To $100

Citigroup: Oil Will Never Return To $100

Citigroup analysts said on Thursday…

Simon Watkins

Simon Watkins

Simon Watkins is a former senior FX trader and salesman, financial journalist, and best-selling author. He was Head of Forex Institutional Sales and Trading for…

More Info

Premium Content

Is Iran Preparing To Send Oil Back To $100?

Two of Saudi Arabia’s key oil sites are attacked and its oil production is more than halved but the US$70-75 per barrel of Brent oil barrier holds firm. The U.S. assassinates the most important man in the most volatile regime in the Middle East but the level still holds firm. Iran retaliates with missile attacks against the U.S. base [Ain al-Assad] in Iraq but the cap remains unbreached. The U.S. has gone to great lengths to put a serious lid on the oil price at this US$70-75 per barrel of Brent level for the economic political reasons analysed below, supported by a variety of means also examined below, but retaliatory moves being planned by Iran for the execution of Major General Qassem Soleimani by the U.S. might blow through the cap and even through the key US$100 per barrel of Brent resistance level.

The importance of the US$70-75 per barrel level is that it is a heavily protected barrier to any sustained moves to and through the US$75-plus per barrel level, which is a key psychological and technical resistance for oil pricing. Such a sustained move upwards would almost certainly lead to long-term stop loss short positions (and similarly short-structured options positions) being triggered and pushing oil up to and through the US$90 per barrel level and towards US$100 per barrel. Two very bad things can happen for U.S. presidents when this sort of upwards momentum around these sorts of levels starts to look sustained, especially for U.S. presidents seeking re-election.

‘Bad thing number one’ is that, according to the statistics, since World War I, the sitting U.S. president has won re-election 11 times out of 11 if the economy was not in recession within 24 months ahead of an election. Conversely, presidents who went into a re-election campaign with the economy in recession lost five out of seven times. Up until very recently, many of the smarter investment houses were predicting a fifty per cent chance of an outright U.S. recession within the coming 12 months and, although this has substantially gone down (most now see just a 10-15 per cent chance of such an event), the point is that a upwards-spiralling oil price could change this probability very quickly indeed, and U.S. President Donald Trump knows this. Related: Russia Risks Gasoline Price Surge

In this context, according to the American Automobile Association in Washington, for every cent that the national average price of gasoline rises, more than one billion dollars per year in discretionary additional consumer spending is estimated to be lost – ‘bad thing number two’. At the moment, the price per gallon of gasoline at the pumps in the U.S. is around US$2.66, whilst the ‘danger zone’ for U.S. presidents starts at around US$3.00 per gallon; at US$4.00 per gallon, they are being advised to pack their bags in Pennsylvania Avenue or start a war to divert the public’s attention. The point was underlined by Bob McNally, the former energy adviser to the former President George W. Bush that: “Few things terrify an American president more than a spike in fuel [gasoline] prices.”

As a general historical rule of thumb, it is estimated that every US$10 per barrel change in the price of crude oil results in a 25-cent change in the price of a gallon of gasoline. Based on more recent historical precedent, a US$90-95 per barrel of Brent oil price equates to around US$3 per gallon of gasoline and a US$125-130 per barrel of Brent equates to around US$4 per gallon of gasoline.

This is the principal reason why whenever there has been a spike in the global benchmark Brent oil price (and corollary WTI price, which tends to trade at an historical discount of US$5-10 per barrel to Brent, and is currently at a discount of around US$6.00 per barrel) the ‘Trump price cap comment’ kicks in. The full effect of this was illustrated last May when oil prices started to spike up decisively on news that the U.S. was to withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran and to re-introduce sanctions against it. WTI was spiking through the US$65.00 per barrel level, and Brent through US$70.00, when Trump Tweeted: “Very important that OPEC increase the flow of Oil [sic]. World Markets are fragile, price of Oil getting too high [sic]. Thank you!”

Since then, whenever there has been a spike close to or even temporarily through the US$70.00 per barrel level of Brent, Trump has Tweeted, texted and telephoned in various inducements or threats to various entities with a stake in the oil price. These include U.S. shale producers, Norway, Brazil, and Canada (produce more), the core U.S. investment banks that are also part of the U.S.’s interest rates market control group (sell oil through the forwards and futures markets at and around the US$70 per barrel of Brent level) and Saudi (produce more and if you cannot then do not publicly sanction others at the time, like Iraq, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and the rest for breaking their OPEC production quotas). Related: Could ISIS Take Control Over Iraq’s Largest Oil Field?

Just in case Saudi Arabia ever forgets what is at stake if it does not toe the U.S. line, then Trump helpfully reminded it in October: “We protect Saudi Arabia...And I love the King, King Salman. But I said ‘King - we’re protecting you - you might not be there for two weeks without us…’.” This references the very basis of the U.S.-Saudi relationship since 14 February 1945 when the then-U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Saudi King at the time, Abdulaziz, had their first face-to-face meeting on board the U.S. Navy cruiser Quincy in the Great Bitter Lake segment of the Suez Canal. The deal they agreed – analysed in depth in my new book on the oil markets - that persisted completely unchallenged until the Oil Crisis of 1973 but was then resumed, was this: the U.S. would get all of the oil supplies it needed for as long as Saudi had oil in place, in return for which the U.S. would guarantee the security both of the country and of the ruling House of Saud.

At the same time, Trump can rely on Russia to do precisely what it wants regarding oil production, which is to produce whatever it likes provided that it does not cause the oil price to dive. Around US$40 per barrel of Brent is the breakeven price for the Russian budget but the big oil producer bosses – notably President Vladimir Putin’s close friend, Igor Sechin of Rosneft – think the optimal price at which they can produce pretty much the levels they want without triggering a domino-effect fall in prices is in the US$60-65 per barrel of Brent range.

All of this said, Iran has not even really begun extracting its revenge for the killing of Soleimani, according to a senior Iran source who works closely with Iran’s Petroleum Ministry. “It [Iran] said that the missile attacks against the U.S. base [Ain al-Assad] in Iraq would be the end of it but obviously that’s what they would say; in fact, a lot more is likely to come,” he exclusively told OilPrice.com last week. There are two strategies that are “almost certain to happen in the next two months or so”, he added, and these are (in no particular order, as Iran will probably do both): first, launch further rocket attacks on Saudi and, second, disrupt oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz.

As exclusively highlighted by OilPrice.com at the time, the 14th of September attacks by the Houthis/Iran on Saudi Arabia’s Aqaiq and Khurais oil facilities cut the Kingdom’s oil production by around 5.7 million barrels per day (much more than half). Contrary to Saudi claims, production is still not back to what it was before the attacks so any further attacks would have a much bigger effect on oil prices, as Saudi is already using almost everything it can from other sources to plug its supply contracts with major buyers. Further such attacks would have a true element of karma about them from the Iranian perspective, as the original attack was believed to be an idea from Soleimani, and also they would lead to a spike in oil prices that would substantially benefit Iran’s beleaguered economy.

Disrupting oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz is a tried-and-tested method of Iran to assert its influence in the world, as it is the chief artery through which around 30 per cent of the world’s oil supplies flow. It is also extremely narrow at various points so, in addition to hijacking vessels, disabling vessels, and warning ships not go through the Strait without specific permission from Iran, it would be very easy to launch further attacks from the shores through very rudimentary weapons systems. It is highly apposite to note at this point – with reference to the US$70-75 per barrel Brent barrier – that the last time that Iran seriously threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz in 2011/2012, oil prices went through US$128 per barrel, and the gasoline price at pumps in the U.S. to US$3.9970, and remained elevated for many weeks. 

By Simon Watkins for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Sam Saharkhiz on January 15 2020 said:
    Mr. Simon Watkins,
    You wrote "The U.S. assassinates the most important man in the most volatile regime in the Middle East but the level still holds firm."
    Have you watched the funeral procession for the General Soleimani? In case you missed it, you can watch it on YouTube: all 30 hours of 3 days and night non-stop procession in 5 major cities in Iran and 3 major cities in Iraq.
    Watching millions of mourners pouring into the streets to commemorate General Soleimani's service to his country and support their government to take revenge for the U.S. assassination, it is quite mind boggling that you label that regime (country) as "the most volatile regime in the Middle East" versus all the U.S. closest allies in the region which are ruled by absolute monarchs without any elected body to represent the people.
    It seems you have no notion of stable vs volatile political system; no revolutionary regime which has passed devastating war relying on its people can be considered a VOLATILE regime. Iranians are still struggling for the good governance and accountable rulers but this does not mean that the system is volatile and the recent show of unity by the Iranians must have put the most skeptical minds at rest. you do not know Iranian culture and history, hence you make absurd statements. Iranians will unite whenever they feel their country is threaten by a foreign power and this does not show any sign of volatility, quite on contrary it shows that Iran indeed is the most stable country in the region whether YOU LIKE it or NOT.
    How a country can be possibly VOLATILE when their influence spreads across the Middle-East from Yemen to Lebanon? Their influence in Iraq surpasses the U.S. after spending 3 Trillion Dollars and 5000 KIA!
    At very least, your knowledge of the Middle East region is not very accurate and needs a lot more education in your part.
    For your information, General Soleimani was not the most important man in the country, perhaps he was the most revered one among the upper echelon: his funeral procession was a clear depiction of this fact.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on January 15 2020 said:
    One and only one reason has prevented crude oil prices from rocketing in the aftermath of the very significant geopolitical events since the attack on Saudi oil installations and those that followed is the existing glut in the global oil market.

    The glut which has been augmented to an estimated 4.0-5.0 million barrels a day (mbd) by almost two years of the trade war has been big enough to undermine OPEC+ production cuts, nullify the impact of geopolitics and also outages on oil prices and even absorb the loss of half of Saudi oil production and the recent mutual strikes by the US and Iran. Until the glut starts to deplete steeply, any geopolitical events no matter how important they are will hardly affect oil prices seriously.

    And whilst Iran holds the global economy hostage by its ability to mine or block the Strait of Hormuz thus precipitating a global oil crisis with oil prices surging beyond $100 a barrel, it will not resort to such measure to revenge the assassination of its slain General because this amounts to a declaration of War against the United States and the world at large. Iran is too shrewd and calculating to indulge in such a risky measure. Only if its crude oil exports are hindered will it take such a measure in self-defence.

    Still, Iran’s revenge is far from over. Therefore, Iran’s strategy in coming days and months will aim to force the eviction of American forces from Iraq. Losing Iraq will be a significant strategic victory for Iran. This will eventually be followed by the withdrawal of all American forces from the Middle East leaving it to China and Russia, Iran and Turkey to fill the political vacuum that will ensue.

    The world is also aware that Saudi oil installations are now hostage to Iran’s allies, the Houthis in Yemen as long as the war in Yemen continues or as long as Iran wants them threatened.

    US shale oil production and also production by non-OPEC producers such as Norway, Brazil and Canada couldn’t offset a major deficit in oil supplies in 2020 or after because of the slowdown in US production and also continued decline in Norway’s production.

    Despite the EIA’s well known hype, US oil production is overstated by at least 2 million barrels a day (mbd) and, therefore, US production averaged 10.3 mbd in 2019 and not 12.3 mbd as the EIA claimed and is projected to decline to under 10 mbd or in 2020. This means that the US may need to import up to 11 mbd in 2020 let alone contributing to non-OPEC oil supply growth in 2020.

    Still, oil prices above $100 are good for the global economy. The global economy can’t reconcile itself with low oil prices. The reason is that the three biggest chunks that make up the global economy, namely the global oil industry, the economies of the oil-producing countries and global investments will be undermined as we have seen in the aftermath of the 2014 oil price crash.

    A fair oil price ranges from $100-$120 a barrel. Such a price stimulates the global economy by enhancing global investments, enables the oil-producing nations to earn more revenue and thus balance their budgets and expand expenditure and investments and also enables the global oil industry to balance its books and finance more projects around the world.

    However, if the de-escalation of the trade war gains momentum in 2020, oil prices could be projected to average $73-$75 a barrel in 2020 or 11%-14% higher than 2019.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Orchid Anton on January 15 2020 said:
    Eliminating key figures in certain countries to only benefit another country, will make world wide enemies, & will not be supported by allies, & will come back to hunt the country responsible for the world wide havoc, one country alone will not be able to stand on their own, because they believe that they are more superior than another, that's wishful thinking and a destroyer of world peace, & self destruction !
  • Craig Lewis on January 20 2020 said:
    Let it RISE. It will be the END of Oil. We are in the AGE of QUANTAPHENE with Graphene :) POWER to All.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News