• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 4 hours WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 3 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 1 min Trump vs. MbS
  • 16 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 9 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 7 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 13 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 3 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 10 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 4 hours Coal remains a major source of power in Europe.
  • 16 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 12 hours Nopec Sherman act legislation
  • 5 hours Poland signs 20-year deal on U.S. LNG supplies
Alt Text

Oil Prices Subdued, But For How Long?

Oil prices may have closed…

Alt Text

Oil Experts Divided As Iran Sanctions Loom

The world’s top oil trading…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Goldman Sachs: OPEC’s Influence On Oil Prices Is Dwindling

Saudi oil plant

In a research note, Goldman Sachs has effectively demoted OPEC from a price setter to a mere inventory manager, with the cartel’s long-term control over international oil prices diminishing thanks to shale, which sports much faster returns: 6-9 months from final investment decision to peak production versus several years for conventional oil. The lengthy process of conventional oil is precisely what gave OPEC the ability to pull the strings of international prices.

Goldman commended OPEC on its decision to cut production, adding, however, that it had an opposite to the desired effect by “underwriting” shale oil production, and spurring the growth in it that we are now witnessing.

The investment bank also has some bad news for the oil industry, noting that the period between this year and 2019 will see a hefty increase in global oil production thanks to large-scale investments made in 2011-2013. In fact, Goldman expects the possible addition of 1 million barrels of crude to global daily output in the period.

There is some uncertainty as to whether all these mega projects will deliver in line with expectations, given the oil industry’s history of failing to do this, but delivery has improved in the last three years, so the 1 million barrels are a real possibility. Related: Trump’s Budget: Valuing Military Over Energy

In this context, Goldman says, OPEC has a dilemma: should it extend the production cuts to prevent prices from falling further—extending the invite for U.S. shale to come on in fuller force, or should it let them fall to avoid the risk of losing long-term market share, but crippling OPEC members’ bottom line.

Several OPEC members have already expressed their readiness to take part in an extension of the cut or have at least acknowledged the need for such an extension. Even Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s largest producer, has softened its stance from being previously unwilling to further strengthen U.S. shale by extending the deal, to saying it would back an extension if inventories remain high.

Meanwhile, benchmark prices were dealt another blow by the American Petroleum Institute, which yesterday reported a 4.5-million-barrel increase in U.S. crude oil inventories, exceeding analyst expectations of a build half that large.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News