• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 4 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 3 days By Kellen McGovern Jones - "BlackRock Behind New TX-LA Offshore Wind Farm"
  • 10 days Natron Energy Achieves First-Ever Commercial-Scale Production of Sodium-Ion Batteries in the U.S.
  • 10 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 9 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 12 days RUSSIA - Turkey & India Stop Buying Russian Oil as USA Increases Crackdown on Sanctions
ING Sees $88 Brent In Q3 2024

ING Sees $88 Brent In Q3 2024

ING updated its Brent crude…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Despite Huge Losses Oil Companies Reluctant To Shut In Production

Despite Huge Losses Oil Companies Reluctant To Shut In Production

As energy investors look for reasons to be optimistic, many are keeping close tabs on supply figures.

There are some signs that supply is taking a hit from disparate parts of the globe. According to Bloomberg, China might see its output dip by 3 to 5 percent in 2016, down from a record high of 4.3 million barrels per day (mb/d) last year. If that occurs, it would be the largest drop since at least the early 1990s and the first decline in seven years.

China’s oil production does not get nearly as much press as its consumption figures do, but China is actually the fifth largest oil producer in the world. However, China’s onshore oil fields – where the country gets 80 percent of its production – are mature. Without ongoing investment, production tends to decline. Any sources of new production will come from more expensive offshore or tight oil.

“We expect significant cuts in upstream production as the companies cut output at loss-making fields,” Neil Beveridge, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co, told Bloomberg in an interview. “Chinese explorers need to take more radical action to cut operating costs and increase efficiency.” China’s Cnooc, one of its main oil producers, probably has a breakeven price near $41 per barrel. The company says that it will spend less and produce less in 2016. Related: Despite Bold Predictions, T. Boone Pickens Sells All Oil Holdings

In the U.S., there are signs of adjustment as well, although very slowly. Continental Resources gutted its spending program for 2016, reducing capex by 66 percent. That will translate in a dip in production. Output will fall steadily over the course of the year, and the company expects to close out the fourth quarter with production of 180,000 to 190,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, which could be 10 to 15 percent below its 2015 average. Continental Resources might be illustrative of the ravages of low oil prices, since it had much less of its output hedged at higher prices over the past year after liquidating a lot of its hedged positions in 2014. As such, many more companies could begin suffering the same misfortune of lower production as their hedges roll off.

Overall, the EIA expects U.S. production to fall by 700,000 barrels per day by the end of 2016 to 8.5 mb/d, or more than 1 mb/d below the 2015 peak.

However, the oil markets are still suffering terribly because of the ongoing glut. Much of that can be pinned on the fact that oil producers are reluctant to shut in production, even if they are losing money on every barrel sold. A new report from Wood Mackenzie finds that 3.4 mb/d of oil production is “cash negative” at today’s prices, equivalent to about 3.5 percent of global production. But shutting down has its own costs, and could make restarting more difficult and expensive. For some oil fields, shutting down could cause permanent damage to reservoirs. Related: Obama Proposes $10 Tax On Each Barrel Of Oil

That means many companies have every incentive to keep as much production online as possible, even if it ends up being a net-loss. "Given the cost of restarting production, many producers will continue to take the loss in the hope of a rebound in prices," Robert Plummer, VP of investment research at Wood Mackenzie said, according to Reuters. "Curtailed budgets have slowed investment which will reduce future volumes, but there is little evidence of production shut-ins for economic reasons.”

Wood Mackenzie came up with a pretty shocking figure that will make the hearts of every oil bull sink: only 100,000 barrels per day of global production – out of total global output of 96.1 mb/d – has actually been shut in so far (output declining because of natural depletion is a separate thing. This refers to production intentionally shut down because of economic reasons).

It is an unbelievable statistic, given today’s prices, and it demonstrates the difficulty that the oil markets will have in finding some sort of equilibrium. Related: U.S. Rig Count In Free Fall: Plunges By 48 In One Week

Still, there are significant volumes underwater. Wood Mackenzie says that the 2.2 mb/d of expensive oil sands in Canada are in the red. Venezuela is also sitting on 230,000 barrels per day of heavy oil is being produced at a loss. Offshore in the North Sea is another high-cost area, and there is about 220,000 barrels per day of “cash negative” production there. Nevertheless, instead of shutting down, most companies producing at a loss – even at a loss! – will continue to produce, and divert their production into storage rather than suffer the costs of shutting down.

That, of course, will mean that it will take much longer than expected for oil prices to rebound, which will only occur when demand rises and soaks up the excess supply and/or natural depletion saps global production. Maintenance or mechanical problems could knock some output offline as well. But the whole process will take still more time.

In a dramatic move, Morgan Stanley cut its estimated oil price for 2016. The bank now expects oil prices to continue falling through the year instead of rebounding in the second half. The investment bank expects Brent to average $29 per barrel in the fourth quarter, rather than its previous estimate of $59 per barrel issued just last month.

Then again, what if OPEC and Russia meet in February to coordinate production cuts? It still seems unlikely, but unless that happens, oil prices may not stage a rally this year.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • John Snyder on February 07 2016 said:
    YUP! Absolutely! And, there is no oil to pump anymore! Because the magic coach has returned to a pumpkin! YUP! Absolutely! The only truth said in the document is the very last paragraph. '' It still seems unlikely, but unless that happens, oil prices may not stage a rally this year.'' YES! This is the reality. Suck it up. Get with reality. And, prepare for the decline. It is unfathomable how anyone can write such ' if ' and ' maybe ' articles, based on fiction and false beliefs that oil is going up. Shameful, at best. Please stop attempting to create false runs in oil stocks. Perhaps?
  • Mentor Depret on February 08 2016 said:
    Looks like several brokers and oil writers begin to capitulate. It is difficult to understand why after 16 months of price collapse, the natural decline of oil wells isn't visible yet in the supply numbers.
  • Russian Jew on February 08 2016 said:
    It is funny that the only people who does not understand that "shale and sand" will be the first casualties of that Oil World War are "shale and sand" oil "experts". On the other hand, cheer-leading is the source of their living.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News