• 4 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 8 minutes Read: OPEC WILL KILL US SHALE
  • 12 minutes Tidal Power Closer to Commercialisation
  • 16 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 3 hours Why U.S. Growers Are Betting The Farm On Soybeans Amid China Trade War
  • 8 hours Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 28 mins US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 10 hours BATTLE ROYAL: Law of "Supply and Demand". vs. OPEC/Saudi Oil Cartel
  • 20 hours Solar to Become World's Largest Power Source by 2050
  • 1 day Sounds Familiar: Netanyahu Tells Arab Citizens They’re Not Real Israelis
  • 10 hours Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 1 day THE DEATH OF FOSSIL FUEL MARKETS
  • 1 day this is why Climate Friendly Agendas Tread Water
  • 1 day Boeing Faces Safety Questions After Second 737 Crash In Five Months
  • 1 day Exxon Aims For $15-a-Barrel Costs In Giant Permian Operation
  • 9 hours Trump Tariffs On China Working
Alt Text

Is This As Good As It Gets For Oil?

Oil prices have rallied significantly…

Alt Text

Bearish Economic News Weighs On Crude

News about slowing global economic…

Alt Text

Oil Prices Rise On Imminent Trade Deal

Oil prices rose slightly on…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Big Oil Sheds Assets to Fix Balance Sheets

The oil industry may be in the midst of entering a new phase of high costs and slower growth. New oil discoveries are harder to come by, and the scramble to replace depleting production is costing more and more. The days of the large discovery that is easy to tap into are gone. Now, the industry has to go to the ends of the earth to get more oil. And for years, the majors were happy to do so – capital expenditures rose significantly over the last decade for most of the largest oil companies.  But the main problem? Production for many of them has not increased in a corresponding fashion.

Now, instead of blowing evermore cash on boosting booked reserves, several oil companies are pulling back in order to shore up profitability. That means passing on huge projects, divesting from underperforming ones, and focusing on core assets. Much of the cash raised will then be returned to shareholders in buybacks or dividends to prop up their stock prices. This shift to a conservative approach was evident in the most recent earnings season.

Related Article: Betting on the Next Oil Boom? You're Grasping at Straws

Shell made the most headlines by scrapping its Arctic program (for 2014 at least), selling off a $1.1 billion stake in the Wheatstone LNG project in Australia, and selling $1 billion of assets in an offshore oil project in Brazil. Last year it wrote down $2 billion for a gas-to-liquids facility in Louisiana. Most recently, Shell informed Canadian regulators that it will stop work on a proposed oil sands mine in Alberta as it reevaluates “the timing of various asset developments with a focus on maintaining a competitive business and successful delivery of near-term growth projects.” It also announced plans to sell off assets in the North Sea. All told, Shell plans on divesting $15 billion over the next two years. This is because production slipped 5% over the last year despite huge spending.

Chevron is also divesting some assets to improve its balance sheet, although not to the degree of Shell. Its oil production declined 3.5% in 2013 compared to the year before, and it posted negative free cash flow for the year. It’s cutting its spending by 5% to reduce cash flow pressure. CEO John Watson said that 2014 will be its peak year for its LNG spending after two major Australian projects near completion. But, despite the trouble, Chevron is still investing $40 billion in 2014 in an effort to increase oil and gas production by 25% by 2017.

Related Article: French Oil Giant Downsizes in Angola

BP wrapped up a massive divestiture plan last year, to the tune of $38 billion. Its situation is unique in that its overwhelming motivation was to pay for the historic Macondo well blow out in 2010 and all the legal mess that followed. Yet, BP may continue shedding assets to raise cash and cut costs. Fuel Fix reports that BP may sell an additional $10 billion in assets by 2015. The asset sales cut production for the oil giant, which fell 1.9% in 2013. BP also expects production in 2014 to continue to fall. It posted a 30% decline in fourth quarter profit, although BP’s CEO thinks its remaining assets are in good shape.

In this new era of difficult oil, major oil companies are selling assets in order to operate leaner and smarter. This makes sense. Throwing billions of dollars at projects that fail to live up to their billing is not a recipe for success. The flip side is that the failure to find and book new reserves means that many oil companies face an uncertain future as their current production levels slowly decline and they decline to invest in new fields.

By Nicholas Cunningham of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Lee James on February 13 2014 said:
    Do higher petroleum production costs, cutbacks in CAPEX, and increased sales of assets portend yet higher oil prices, as petroleum production falls?

    The article mentions that oil companies are becoming leaner and smarter. Sounds like a good recipe for citizens. How can we do more with less oil and continue to live well? I think we need to be ready with alternatives to our heavy use of fossil fuels. I see our basic options as: efficiency. switching to alternative energy sources and simply doing things differently and smarter.

    Maybe ramp up our transition away from petroleum?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News