• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 10 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 4 hours U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 2 days US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 1 day EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 7 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 4 hours Owning stocks long-term low risk?
  • 2 days The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 11 hours Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 2 days Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 2 days 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 2 days A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 2 days OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 22 hours The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
Alt Text

Is This China’s First Defeat In The Trade War?

Beijing slapped a 10 percent…

Alt Text

How The Trade War Could Benefit Australian Gas

As the U.S.-China tit-for-tat tariff…

Alt Text

Russia To Resume Gas Imports From Turkmenistan

According to Aleksei Miller, Gazprom’s…

Dan Dicker

Dan Dicker

Dan Dicker is a 25 year veteran of the New York Mercantile Exchange where he traded crude oil, natural gas, unleaded gasoline and heating oil…

More Info

Trending Discussions

US Energy Boom vs Russian Energy Influence

It is with incredible equanimity that the media has digested the announcement of a 5 million barrel ‘test’ release from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve on Wednesday, but the market certainly hasn’t – WTI crude plummeted $2.30 on the news.

It doesn’t take much analysis, however, to see that this is a weak attempt to flex some muscle to use the US energy boom as a wedge against Russian energy influence in Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe.  

This ridiculous meme has gained traction in the last week and a half from mostly GOP leaders in Washington, suggesting that the United States ‘drill everywhere’ and begin exporting natural gas into Europe – a silly idea I’ve debunked several times this week in columns and on air  – but now this fantasy has gotten support from real policy in the White House in this latest SPR release.  

To put this in context, the last SPR release was in 2011 in response to a coordinated support of rebels in Libya, offsetting the 1 million barrels a day of lost Libyan supply caused by the war.  Before that, the SPR was used in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina and before that, during Desert Storm in 1991.  The pattern is clear:  the strategic petroleum reserve was designed to be used in the national interest in moments of extreme market stress – which is why this release is being falsely called a ‘test’ by the DOE.  

Test,…

To read the full article

Please sign up and become a premium OilPrice.com member to gain access to read the full article.

RegisterLogin

Trending Discussions





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News