• 20 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 22 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 1 day Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 1 day Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 1 day Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 1 day Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 1 day Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 1 day New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 1 day Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 1 day Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 2 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 5 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

U.S. Causal Link Between Fracking and Earthquakes Deepens

U.S. Causal Link Between Fracking and Earthquakes Deepens

The controversial U.S. energy process of releasing natural gas from deep-seated underground reserves has increasingly moved to the forefront of the debate of U.S. energy autonomy.

Advocates insist that hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” allows U.S. energy companies to exploit previously uneconomic shale gas resources and maintain that not only is the process environmentally safe but that it contributes to U.S. energy autonomy by developing indigenous  energy reserves, lessening U.S. dependency on foreign energy imports.

Opponents insist that the largely unregulated procedure allows for energy companies to inject unknown chemicals deep underground, including known carcinogens, and that at the very least, energy companies should be required to disclose the chemical cocktail soup of substances used in their exploration and exploitation activities, which the firms involved have strongly resisted.

Now however, a secondary issue has emerged, that fracking has the potential to increase regional earthquakes, another charge that energy companies have strongly denied.

The energy companies involved in the procedure have repeatedly demeaned their opponents as environmentalist extremists, but now a state government is supporting the allegations that fracking does in fact pose the risk of increasing seismic activity, opening the door for class-action lawsuits.

At issue?

The disposal of wastewater produced by fracking, which energy companies inject deep underground.

Ohio state officials told the press on 9 March, “After investigating all available geological formation and well activity data, Ohio Department of Natural Resources regulators and geologists found a number of co-occurring circumstances strongly indicating the Youngstown area earthquakes were induced. Specifically, state officials in their data gathering came to the conclusion that fluids from D&L Energy Inc.'s Northstar 1 disposal well in Youngstown intersected with an unmapped fault in a near-failure state of stress, causing movement along that fault."

The ODNR was referring to 12 quakes centered within a mile of the Northstar 1 hydraulic fracturing natural gas well, opened in December 2010. The first Youngstown earthquake occurred four months later, with the first being registered on 17 March 2011. The well is 9,300 feet deep and reaches the Precambrian bedrock and the tremors continued until late December 2011. While the largest of the seismic events measured a modest 4.0 magnitude on the Richter Scale, environmental groups questioned whether the state's safety rules were robust enough to protect the area from disasters they attributed to hydraulic fracturing.

Ohio state officials closed Northstar 1 on 30 December 2011, a day before the final 4.0 magnitude earthquake. Ohio currently has 177 Class II injection wells, alongside the closed Northstar facility, that dispose of brine, a byproduct from drilling for oil and natural gas, by reinjection of the fluid underground.

Columbus officials were quick to react. In announcing the news state regulations for transporting and disposing of fracking byproduct brine wastewater, the nation's toughest disposal requirements, Ohio Natural Resources Director James Zehringer issued a prepared statement remarking, "Ohio has developed a new set of regulatory standards that positions the state as a national leader in safe and environmentally responsible brine disposal."
Oilprice has already written about the rising evidence linking fracking and earthquakes.

Not surprisingly, the state’s energy industry has pushed back, hard. Ohio Oil and Gas Association executive vice president Thomas E. Stewart whined, “"We plan to thoroughly review the new regulations proposed by ODNR and strongly urge the public and state officials to not allow a rare and isolated event to diminish the excellent service record of Class II injection wells in Ohio.”

Ohio’s economy has been in “rustbelt” decline for years before the 2008 global recession damaged it further, as its many heavy industries were some of the first victims of the rampant outsourcing of U.S. manufacturing jobs over the last 40 years.

In such an environment, the revenues generated from shale natural gas production can only be most welcome in the state treasury, but one can only applaud the state officials promoting a “quality of life” issue for those that remains by investigating the collateral effects of unregulated shale gas production.

And Ohio’s stalwart stance may well encourage other state regulators across the Marcellus shale belt, from New York through the Carolinas to pressure their energy company ‘benefactors’ to come clean about their procedures and their environmental consequences.

It’s enough to make an energy company CEO reach for the Remy Martin and call his broker to unload some of his preferred stock, while rifling through is Rolodex to find a pliant politician .

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Randy on March 13 2012 said:
    John, what is it with you and your extreme bias for fracking? If you want to be a politician, run for office. If you want to be a jopurnalist, cut the crap such as,"....president Thomas E. Stewart whined"

    Whined? Really? Whined? Gosh that sounds like you don't like this guys opinion on fracking.
  • Steve Messer on March 13 2012 said:
    Thomas Stewart whined? You told everyone with that one word that you are not a person of science and facts but a person of environmental extremisim, politics, or a person with his own unrealistic agenda.
    Also fracing is indirectly connected to water disposal wells. Water from other sources is also put in water disposal wells. The two subjects are only indirectly connected. Water disposal wells by the thousands have existed in this country for almost one hundred years. How do you explain no earthquakes in many many areas in this country that have them?
  • JanZizka on March 13 2012 said:
    "Specifically, state officials in their data gathering came to the conclusion that fluids from D&L Energy Inc.'s Northstar 1 disposal well in Youngstown intersected with an unmapped fault in a near-failure state of stress, causing movement along that fault."

    The last part of that sentence is key. For one it was an unmapped fault, meaning that it was not known to be there so no one, including the state, had any idea there was a possibility of danger there. For another, it would appear that after the fact it was determined to be in a near-failure state of stress to begin with, which makes me question precisely how much the well had to do with its movement and whether it would have moved eventually due to other factors anyway. This to me seems an isolated accident.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News