• 2 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 2 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 3 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 3 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 4 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 4 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Controversial Azeri Pipeline Receives $500M Funding

The European Bank of Reconstruction…

Alt Text

2 Red Flags For The World’s Top Shale Play

Changing legislation and taxation for…

Keith Schaefer

Keith Schaefer

Keith is the publisher of the Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin – an investment newsletter that looks at opportunities within the Canadian small cap oil…

More Info

LNG: The Best Way To Play Cheap Natural Gas

LNG: The Best Way To Play Cheap Natural Gas

There are 374 LNG carriers in the world.  As recently as a few years ago, roughly one-third of these vessels were laid up, or out of use.

Today, every single LNG ship that is seaworthy is active. That means zero spare capacity, everywhere around the globe.

That begins to explain why the shipping of liquefied natural gas (LNG) has become the most profitable sector in the global shipping industry... and why investing in LNG shippers could be one of the most profitable plays of the next three years.

Fast-rising demand from Asia and tight supply – almost no new ships before the end of 2015 – will keep cash flows and stock prices high for investors.

Then consider this: one of the most abundant and cheap sources of natural gas in the world... U.S. Natural Gas... could extend investors' run right through to 2020.

Demand for LNG is soaring now—and dayrates for shippers are going up even faster. Industry analysts expect global LNG demand will jump 40% to 300 million tons between 2010-2015. But dayrates are already up more than 200%, to $147,000 per day.

Operating costs for these ships are as low as $14,000 per day. That equates to a greater than 90% margin for the top shipping operators... almost unheard-of in any sector today.  And I expect these margins to stay strong for at least three years due to the lack of new ships. (This also helps explain the large Price:Earnings ratios this industry has.) All-in operating costs including amortization is closer to $60,000/day.

Industry observers suggest U.S. LNG export capacity will exceed 6 billion cubic feet per day (6 bcf/d). Six bcf/d is about 9% of the current U.S. daily gas production of 64 bcf/d, the largest output in the world.

This means there is demand for 85 to 100 more LNG carriers –  just for the US export market.

And if even only one-third of the US LNG export terminal projects go through, Norway's Arctic Securities says the industry will still require 28-37 additional vessels – the equivalent of 50-60% of the current order book (which is roughly 64 new ships).

The US has actually already delivered its first LNG export—one ship has gone from Louisiana-based Sabine Pass LNG terminal owned by Cheniere Energy (NYSE:LNG) to the UK.

Last October, the United Kingdom's BG Group signed the first contract to export LNG from the United States once the first liquefaction terminal is ready in 2015. (Liquefaction is the process of turning gas into LNG—gas gets compressed to 600:1 in a liquid. A liquefaction plant IS an LNG export terminal; LNG import terminals are called Regasification plants.)

BG said they'll buy 3.5 million tons per year of LNG (1 million tons=0.12 bcf/d) over a 20 year period from Cheniere at Sabine Pass. Construction on the project is expected to start in April. Private equity fund giant Blackstone is helping to move the project along by providing $2 billion of the $5 billion needed for project financing (in exchange for an equity stake) to Cheniere subsidiary, Cheniere Energy Partners.

Spain and India have also signed deals with Cheniere. Five LNG export terminals in the US are now actively being discussed and applied for, which would total about 8.4 bcf/d. The three Canadian proposals for Kitimat B.C. total 2.9 bcf/d. As context, consider the average LNG carrier holds just under 3 bcf.

Energy consultancy PFC Energy spoke about the deal, “Lots of companies that have been skeptical about U.S. LNG exports will look at the BG deal and wonder whether they should be studying this more closely.”

(For you history buffs, the first LNG carrier, the Methane Pioneer, was built in 1959... and transported LNG from Lake Charles, Louisiana to Canvey Island in the United Kingdom.)

LNG exports from the US are NOT expected to have a material increase in US natural gas prices, however.

Robert Brooks of Los Angeles-based RBAC Inc., which develops energy market models, told the Oil and Gas Financial Journal – an excellent resource, by the way --  ogf.com.

“Using RBAC’s GPCM model, we ran five different scenarios with export volumes from 0 to 6 bcf/day, all originating from LNG export terminals along the Gulf Coast,” he said. “We found that the average impact on price at the Henry Hub varied from $0.13 for 1 bcf/day to $1.33 for the extreme 6 bcf/day case.”

At current prices of $2.35-ish in the US, an extra $1.33 will only allow the lowest cost producers to be profitable. The article suggested this would be a big deal— but I don't see sub-$4 gas as a big deal.

In fact, this should help permitting of these LNG export terminals if politicians know that even at maximum capacity of 6 bcf/d leaving American shores won't really increase input costs for industry or residential home heating.

As yet, the development of six massive LNG export facilities in Australia has not had a significant impact on domestic natural gas prices.

(Please remember all this thinking assumes that the bulls are wrong and the shale gas wells won't deplete in 5-6 years.)

I think the global LNG shipping market will STILL BE UNDERSUPPLIED even with no US LNG exports.

LNG Tanker

Morgan Stanley suggests that even though liquefaction capacity is ONLY increasing at 6-8 bcf/d from 2011-2015, that still means the industry needs another 75-100 LNG tankers. The current order book is only 60 and if you can get a spot in the production line in the shipbuilders' schedule at all (drillships and offshore rigs are your competition) it's a two-year build. Liquefaction capacity is the #1 restraint on the global LNG market developing even faster; the demand is there in spades.

So even at the end of 2015, the industry will not likely have caught up with demand yet.

To sum up—the fundamentals for the industry are sound until at least 2015. According to the Oslo-based investment bank RS Platou Markets AS, demand for LNG carriers will expand 12% this year while the fleet will grow little. The world's largest shipbroker, London-based Clarkson PLC, said that only two tankers will join the fleet of 374 ships, an expansion of less than 1%.

An analyst for Morgan Stanley, Fotis Giannakoulis, said “This bottleneck cannot be corrected overnight. It will take years, and it is an opportunity for a lot of LNG shipowners to generate premium returns.”

Then in the period from 2015 onward, the anticipated arrival of the United States as a major exporter of its abundant and low-cost shale gas could mean boom times for the industry until 2020, as the number of ships needed continues to struggle with the ever-increasing demand for LNG vessels.

By. Keith Schaefer

Publisher, the Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News