• 4 minutes Ten Years of Plunging Solar Prices
  • 7 minutes Hydrogen Capable Natural Gas Turbines
  • 10 minutes World looks on in horror as Trump flails over pandemic despite claims US leads way
  • 13 minutes Large gas belt discovered in China
  • 2 hours Yale University Epidemiologist Publishes Paper on Major Benefits of Hydroxchloroquine for High-risk Outpatients. Quacksalvers like Fauci should put lives ahead of Politics
  • 3 hours Would bashing China solve all the problems of the United States
  • 58 mins COVID 19 May Be Less Deadly Than Flu Study Finds
  • 4 hours Model 3 cheaper to buy than BMW 3 series.
  • 21 mins Can I Sue This Site for If People Post Inaccurate Information?
  • 11 hours China to Impose Dictatorship on Hong Kong
  • 7 hours Incompetent "Journalists"
  • 1 hour Thugs in Trumpistan
  • 2 hours Pompeo's Hong Kong
  • 1 day Iran's first oil tanker has arrived near Venezuela
  • 1 day Chicago Threatens To Condemn - Possibly Demolish - Churches Defying Lockdown
  • 1 day Let’s Try This....
  • 1 day HVDC Cheaper Than Low-carbon Natural Gas
  • 18 hours 60 mph electric mopeds
  • 1 day Oil and Gas After COVID-19
Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Trudeau Pushes Through LNG Megaproject Despite Environmental Concerns

The Canadian federal government has given the green light to the $8-billion Pacific NorthWest LNG project, proposed by Malaysia’s Petronas three years ago. The decision is highly controversial because it follows an assessment that found the project will produce significant amounts of CO2, which would go against PM Trudeau’s stated commitment to take climate change seriously and work to slow it down.

The Pacific NorthWest LNG plant is designed to produce over 20.5 million tons of liquefied natural gas a year, in the process generating some 4.3 million tons of carbon dioxide, according to the assessment by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA).

The assessment also noted that the project was “likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects”, which is what reinforced the vigorous opposition of environmentalists and First Nations, even though Environment Minister Catherine McKenna, who authored the final version of the report, released on Monday, added that these effects appeared to be justified, as decided by the Governor in Council.

An earlier version of the report, which was released in February, had estimated the annual CO2 emissions from the Pacific NorthWest LNG plant at 5.3 million tons, plus another 6.5 million to 8.7 million tons from gas collection and transportation.

In the final decision, which was approved by the federal government, there are 190 conditions that Petronas, the author of the project, needs to meet. These include putting in place adequate mitigation measures for the expected “adverse environmental effects”, consultations with First Nations on any steps that may concern them, and regular reporting to the CEAA.

The First Nations in British Columbia are not happy with this decision and neither are environmentalists. But here’s the ironic twist: Malaysia’s Petronas may eventually decide to shelve the project.

The company has waited three years for this approval. It tabled the project when LNG prices were going up and the future looked bright for this (relatively) new celebrity fuel. This celebrity status spurred a rush of LNG projects, many of them focused on the Asian market, which was developing much more quickly than the European one. Related: BP Faces Another Setback In Plans To Drill Pristine Australian Coast

Now, Asia is drowning in cheap LNG. While Petronas last year made a preliminary final investment decision on the Pacific NorthWest project, it probably didn’t expect that the government’s approval of the environmental implications of the project would be delayed for a year.

That’s why Petronas’ reaction to the news about the approval was somewhat guarded. "The announcement was just made ... We need time to look at the conditions and then we will have a review of the project," said CEO Wan Zulkiflee Wan Ariffin, as quoted by Reuters.

It’s not unthinkable that Trudeau just scored an auto-goal with this approval, antagonizing environmentalist groups that he courted before the elections, not to mention First Nations. Truth be told, a different decision would have antagonized a different set of groups; not just businesses, but regular voters in British Columbia. The Pacific NorthWest LNG saga has turned into a textbook demonstration of the impossibility of having your cake and eating it.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • cal buzzy on October 15 2016 said:
    could you detail how much and where radon and radioactive lead from lng production settles. radon condenses at same temp as propane which is burned as fuel at plant. dusting the local population with tons of radioactive lead micro-particles a year.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News