• 4 minutes Permian in for Prosperous and Bright Future
  • 7 minutes Amount of Oil Usage in the United States
  • 10 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 10 hours Something wicked this way comes
  • 19 hours Why NG falling n crude up?
  • 1 day Famine, Economic Collapse of China on the Horizon?
  • 3 hours US after 4 more years of Trump?
  • 1 day Oil giants partner with environmental group to track Permian Basin's methane emissions
  • 1 day .
  • 4 days Daniel Yergin Book is a Reality Check on Energy
  • 15 hours Top HHS official takes leave of absence after Facebook rant about CDC conspiracies
  • 21 hours Nord Stream 2 Halt Possible Over Navalny Poisoning
  • 2 days The Perfect Solution To Remove Conflict Problems In The South China East Asia Sea
  • 19 hours .
  • 4 days Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 5 days Gepthermal fracking: how to confuse a greenie
BP And Shell Take A Stand Against Gas Flaring In Texas

BP And Shell Take A Stand Against Gas Flaring In Texas

International oil giants BP and…

Natural Gas Industry Sees Support From U.S. Voters

Natural Gas Industry Sees Support From U.S. Voters

U.S. voters generally support natural…

Why Australia’s COVID Recovery Should Focus On Gas

Why Australia’s COVID Recovery Should Focus On Gas

A COVID recovery commission in…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Trudeau Pushes Through LNG Megaproject Despite Environmental Concerns

The Canadian federal government has given the green light to the $8-billion Pacific NorthWest LNG project, proposed by Malaysia’s Petronas three years ago. The decision is highly controversial because it follows an assessment that found the project will produce significant amounts of CO2, which would go against PM Trudeau’s stated commitment to take climate change seriously and work to slow it down.

The Pacific NorthWest LNG plant is designed to produce over 20.5 million tons of liquefied natural gas a year, in the process generating some 4.3 million tons of carbon dioxide, according to the assessment by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA).

The assessment also noted that the project was “likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects”, which is what reinforced the vigorous opposition of environmentalists and First Nations, even though Environment Minister Catherine McKenna, who authored the final version of the report, released on Monday, added that these effects appeared to be justified, as decided by the Governor in Council.

An earlier version of the report, which was released in February, had estimated the annual CO2 emissions from the Pacific NorthWest LNG plant at 5.3 million tons, plus another 6.5 million to 8.7 million tons from gas collection and transportation.

In the final decision, which was approved by the federal government, there are 190 conditions that Petronas, the author of the project, needs to meet. These include putting in place adequate mitigation measures for the expected “adverse environmental effects”, consultations with First Nations on any steps that may concern them, and regular reporting to the CEAA.

The First Nations in British Columbia are not happy with this decision and neither are environmentalists. But here’s the ironic twist: Malaysia’s Petronas may eventually decide to shelve the project.

The company has waited three years for this approval. It tabled the project when LNG prices were going up and the future looked bright for this (relatively) new celebrity fuel. This celebrity status spurred a rush of LNG projects, many of them focused on the Asian market, which was developing much more quickly than the European one. Related: BP Faces Another Setback In Plans To Drill Pristine Australian Coast

Now, Asia is drowning in cheap LNG. While Petronas last year made a preliminary final investment decision on the Pacific NorthWest project, it probably didn’t expect that the government’s approval of the environmental implications of the project would be delayed for a year.

That’s why Petronas’ reaction to the news about the approval was somewhat guarded. "The announcement was just made ... We need time to look at the conditions and then we will have a review of the project," said CEO Wan Zulkiflee Wan Ariffin, as quoted by Reuters.

It’s not unthinkable that Trudeau just scored an auto-goal with this approval, antagonizing environmentalist groups that he courted before the elections, not to mention First Nations. Truth be told, a different decision would have antagonized a different set of groups; not just businesses, but regular voters in British Columbia. The Pacific NorthWest LNG saga has turned into a textbook demonstration of the impossibility of having your cake and eating it.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • cal buzzy on October 15 2016 said:
    could you detail how much and where radon and radioactive lead from lng production settles. radon condenses at same temp as propane which is burned as fuel at plant. dusting the local population with tons of radioactive lead micro-particles a year.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News