• 4 minute Hey Oil Bulls - How Long Till Increasing Oil Prices and Strengthening Dollar Start Killing Demand in Developing Countries?
  • 8 minutes Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 15 minutes Oil and Trade War
  • 2 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 10 hours Migrants: Italy Wants EU Border Agency In Africa, Not At Sea
  • 7 hours Are EVs Safer Than Combustion Engine Vehicles?
  • 3 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 6 hours WE Solutions plans to print cars
  • 5 hours Russia, Saudi Push For Big Hike In Oil Output Despite Iran Opposition
  • 6 hours Oil prices going down
  • 11 hours Nopec Sherman act legislation
  • 10 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 13 hours The Irrelevance Of BTU Rating - Big Oil's Gimmick To Hoodwink The Public
  • 15 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 17 hours Sabotage at Tesla
  • 13 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 12 hours Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 5 hours Oil and Trade War
  • 5 hours Australia mulls LNG import
Alt Text

Australia Looks To Tackle Its Looming Gas Shortage

The world’s soon-to-be top liquefied…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Is Colorado Ground Zero For The Next Shale Gas Boom?

Colorado fracking

A new estimate from the U.S. Geological Survey finds that Colorado could actually hold 40 times more natural gas than previously expected.

The so-called Mancos Shale formation holds an estimated 66.3 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of natural gas, sharply up from the 1.6 tcf in the previous 2003 estimate. The Mancos formation is part of the greater Uinta-Piceance Province, and the large upward revision puts the Mancos basin second only to the Marcellus Shale in terms of the largest total gas reserves in the U.S.

“We reassessed the Mancos Shale in the Piceance Basin as part of a broader effort to reassess priority onshore U.S. continuous oil and gas accumulations,” said USGS scientist Sarah Hawkins, lead author of the assessment. “In the last decade, new drilling in the Mancos Shale provided additional geologic data and required a revision of our previous assessment of technically recoverable, undiscovered oil and gas.”

For now, prices are likely to be too low for companies to begin drilling to any large extent. According to David Ludlam of the West Slope Colorado Oil and Gas Association, drillers probably need natural gas prices near $3.50 per million Btu (MMBtu). That is much higher than Henry Hub spot prices, which have traded near $2/MMBtu for the last several months, although they have surged lately as storage levels are climbing much slower than expected for this time of year. Natural gas prices jumped to $2.60 on Thursday after the latest data from the EIA showed another smaller-than-expected inventory build. Related: Billionaire Investors Back A Gold Price Rally In 2016

But even if prices did rise to those levels needed for Colorado’s Mancos Shale, producers would have trouble finding a way to get that gas to market. The best bet would be for LNG export terminals on the West Coast, but previous proposals for such projects have gone nowhere. The Jordan Cove LNG export terminal in Oregon recently was denied a federal permit and is stuck on the drawing board.

That suggests that the Mancos Shale may not be developed in the near-term despite the massive volume of natural gas that the formation holds.

(Click to enlarge)

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • CapitalistRoader on June 11 2016 said:
    So, 66 * 10^12 new supply divided by 25 * 10^6 current US annual consumption equals 2.64 million years of consumption. Or is my math off?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News