• 4 minutes Ten Years of Plunging Solar Prices
  • 7 minutes Hydrogen Capable Natural Gas Turbines
  • 10 minutes World looks on in horror as Trump flails over pandemic despite claims US leads way
  • 13 minutes Large gas belt discovered in China
  • 6 hours The Downside of Political Correctness
  • 2 hours Rioting and Protesting
  • 5 mins George Floyd’s History
  • 8 hours US and Australia Sign SPR Lease Agreement
  • 2 hours Let's try to link the recent events back to the situation with oil production and pricing
  • 21 hours Healing, Not Hatred
  • 2 hours In the Event of WW3, Oil and/or Renewables?
  • 2 hours Main Stream Media falls into depressed mood today after hearing the record May jobs report UP 2.5 MILLION JOBS !
  • 11 hours China To Boost Oil & Gas Exploration, As EU Prepares To Commit Suicide
  • 19 hours Trump waves a Bible
  • 5 hours Coronavirus hype biggest political hoax in history
  • 8 hours China’s Oil Thirst Draws an Armada of Tankers
  • 18 hours Trumps Oil Industry....
  • 21 hours Let’s Try This....
  • 23 hours Chicago Threatens To Condemn - Possibly Demolish - Churches Defying Lockdown
Is This The Next Major Market For U.S. LNG?

Is This The Next Major Market For U.S. LNG?

Turkey is moving away from…

The U.S. Becomes The World’s Swing LNG Producer

The U.S. Becomes The World’s Swing LNG Producer

The United States has turned…

Europe’s Gas Glut Could Hit Global LNG Market Hard

Europe’s Gas Glut Could Hit Global LNG Market Hard

Although LNG flows into Europe…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Is Colorado Ground Zero For The Next Shale Gas Boom?

A new estimate from the U.S. Geological Survey finds that Colorado could actually hold 40 times more natural gas than previously expected.

The so-called Mancos Shale formation holds an estimated 66.3 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of natural gas, sharply up from the 1.6 tcf in the previous 2003 estimate. The Mancos formation is part of the greater Uinta-Piceance Province, and the large upward revision puts the Mancos basin second only to the Marcellus Shale in terms of the largest total gas reserves in the U.S.

“We reassessed the Mancos Shale in the Piceance Basin as part of a broader effort to reassess priority onshore U.S. continuous oil and gas accumulations,” said USGS scientist Sarah Hawkins, lead author of the assessment. “In the last decade, new drilling in the Mancos Shale provided additional geologic data and required a revision of our previous assessment of technically recoverable, undiscovered oil and gas.”

For now, prices are likely to be too low for companies to begin drilling to any large extent. According to David Ludlam of the West Slope Colorado Oil and Gas Association, drillers probably need natural gas prices near $3.50 per million Btu (MMBtu). That is much higher than Henry Hub spot prices, which have traded near $2/MMBtu for the last several months, although they have surged lately as storage levels are climbing much slower than expected for this time of year. Natural gas prices jumped to $2.60 on Thursday after the latest data from the EIA showed another smaller-than-expected inventory build. Related: Billionaire Investors Back A Gold Price Rally In 2016

But even if prices did rise to those levels needed for Colorado’s Mancos Shale, producers would have trouble finding a way to get that gas to market. The best bet would be for LNG export terminals on the West Coast, but previous proposals for such projects have gone nowhere. The Jordan Cove LNG export terminal in Oregon recently was denied a federal permit and is stuck on the drawing board.

That suggests that the Mancos Shale may not be developed in the near-term despite the massive volume of natural gas that the formation holds.

(Click to enlarge)

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • CapitalistRoader on June 11 2016 said:
    So, 66 * 10^12 new supply divided by 25 * 10^6 current US annual consumption equals 2.64 million years of consumption. Or is my math off?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News