• 3 minutes Biden Seeks $2 Trillion Clean Energy And Infrastructure Spending Boost
  • 5 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 8 minutes Gazprom fails to exempt Nord Stream-2 from EU market rules
  • 17 mins Trumpist lies about coronavirus too bad for Facebook - BANNED!
  • 53 mins The World is Facing a Solar Panel Waste Problem
  • 9 hours Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 9 hours Biden admits he has been tested for Cognitive Decline several times. Didn't show any proof of test results.
  • 5 hours The Core Issue Of US Chaos..Finally disclosed
  • 10 hours Trump Suggests Delaying Election Amid Fraud Claims
  • 8 hours Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 9 hours China's impending economic meltdown
  • 9 hours Why Oil could hit $100
  • 10 hours Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
  • 4 hours Pompeo upsets China; oil & gas prices to fall
  • 8 hours Russia Trying To Steal COVID-19 Vaccine Data, Say UK, U.S. and Canada
  • 1 day End Game For Oil? OPEC Prepares For An Age Of Dwindling Demand
Why Natural Gas Prices Just Exploded

Why Natural Gas Prices Just Exploded

Natural gas prices were soaring…

Will Buffett’s $10 Billion Bet On Natural Gas Go Bust?

Will Buffett’s $10 Billion Bet On Natural Gas Go Bust?

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Is Colorado Ground Zero For The Next Shale Gas Boom?

A new estimate from the U.S. Geological Survey finds that Colorado could actually hold 40 times more natural gas than previously expected.

The so-called Mancos Shale formation holds an estimated 66.3 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of natural gas, sharply up from the 1.6 tcf in the previous 2003 estimate. The Mancos formation is part of the greater Uinta-Piceance Province, and the large upward revision puts the Mancos basin second only to the Marcellus Shale in terms of the largest total gas reserves in the U.S.

“We reassessed the Mancos Shale in the Piceance Basin as part of a broader effort to reassess priority onshore U.S. continuous oil and gas accumulations,” said USGS scientist Sarah Hawkins, lead author of the assessment. “In the last decade, new drilling in the Mancos Shale provided additional geologic data and required a revision of our previous assessment of technically recoverable, undiscovered oil and gas.”

For now, prices are likely to be too low for companies to begin drilling to any large extent. According to David Ludlam of the West Slope Colorado Oil and Gas Association, drillers probably need natural gas prices near $3.50 per million Btu (MMBtu). That is much higher than Henry Hub spot prices, which have traded near $2/MMBtu for the last several months, although they have surged lately as storage levels are climbing much slower than expected for this time of year. Natural gas prices jumped to $2.60 on Thursday after the latest data from the EIA showed another smaller-than-expected inventory build. Related: Billionaire Investors Back A Gold Price Rally In 2016

But even if prices did rise to those levels needed for Colorado’s Mancos Shale, producers would have trouble finding a way to get that gas to market. The best bet would be for LNG export terminals on the West Coast, but previous proposals for such projects have gone nowhere. The Jordan Cove LNG export terminal in Oregon recently was denied a federal permit and is stuck on the drawing board.

That suggests that the Mancos Shale may not be developed in the near-term despite the massive volume of natural gas that the formation holds.

(Click to enlarge)

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • CapitalistRoader on June 11 2016 said:
    So, 66 * 10^12 new supply divided by 25 * 10^6 current US annual consumption equals 2.64 million years of consumption. Or is my math off?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News