• 3 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 8 minutes Why Is America (Texas) Burning Millions of Dollars Per Day Of Natural Gas?
  • 11 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 15 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 32 mins The Pope: "Climate change ... doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain."
  • 14 hours Hormuz and surrounding waters: Energy Threats to the World: Oil, LNG, shipping markets digest new risks after Strait of Hormuz attack
  • 18 hours As Iran Nuclear Deal Flounders, France Turns To Saudi For Oil
  • 13 hours The Magic and Wonders of US Shale Supply: Keeping energy price shock minimised: US oil supply keeping lid on prices despite global risks: IEA chief
  • 22 hours Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 16 hours Never Knew Gasoline Prices were this important!
  • 15 hours (Un)expectedly: UK Court Sets Assange U.S. Extradition Hearing For February 2020
  • 14 hours Russia removes special military forces from Venezuela . . . . Maduro gone by September ? . . . Oil starts to flow ? Think so . .
  • 1 day Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 4 hours Plants are Dying
  • 11 hours We Are Better Than This
  • 1 day Emmissions up, renewables nowhere
  • 1 day Middle East Attack Jolts Oil-Import Dependent Asia
Alt Text

The Gas Flaring Crisis In The U.S. Oil Patch

The amount of natural gas…

Alt Text

China's Biggest Weapon In The Trade War

As China weighs the possibility…

Alt Text

The OPEC Outcast Fighting For LNG Dominance

Since leaving the Organization of…

Tim Daiss

Tim Daiss

I'm an oil markets analyst, journalist and author that has been working out of the Asia-Pacific region for 12 years. I’ve covered oil, energy markets…

More Info

Trending Discussions

China-U.S. Ceasefire Paves Way For New LNG Projects

News broke on Saturday that the U.S. and China had reached a ceasefire in its ongoing trade war after President Trump met with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the G20 summit in Argentina.

According to the White House, the U.S. will still keep in place $200 billion of tariffs on Chinese imports but will not increase those tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent after the start of the year as originally planned. The deal will also keep, at least for now, Trump from placing another $267 billion worth of Chinese goods under tariffs.

Both sides will immediately hold talks on structural changes concerning forced technology transfers made by Chinese firms on U.S. companies, intellectual property rights protection, non-tariff trade barriers, cyber intrusion concerns, cyber theft and agricultural, the White House added.

Washington and Beijing said they will try to achieve a permanent deal within the next 90 days, however the U.S. still has significant leverage, stating that if a formal deal can’t be reached then it will hike tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent, which could roil global stock markets, stagnate global economic growth, dampen oil demand growth and possibly lead to a recession across the globe, particularly in emerging economies.

Chinese State Councilor Wang Yi told reporters, “The two presidents agreed that the two sides can and must get bilateral relations right.”  He added that negotiations were held in a “friendly and candid atmosphere.”

China, for its part, also agreed to offset its massive trade imbalance with the U.S. by buying more, but not yet specified amounts, of energy products, agricultural, industrial and other products. “China is willing to increase imports in accordance with the needs of its domestic markets and the people’s needs, Wang said, “including marketable products from the United States, to gradually ease the imbalance in two-way trade.”

Significant take-aways

There are several significant take-aways from this development, including the argument that Trump’s hard line, even at times belligerent stance with Beijing, has caused them to blink first, particularly since economic growth in China has already started to feel the brunt of U.S. tariffs, while U.S. economic growth, though not as robust as a few months ago, is still strong.

Another significant take-away from the preliminary agreement could be its impact on energy markets, both U.S. oil import to China and perhaps even more importantly from a development perspective liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports. While neither of these two energy products were mentioned by name, it’s likely that China would not only appease the U.S. by removing tariffs on U.S. LNG imports but would also help itself since Beijing needs the diversity of supply that growing U.S. shale oil and gas exports offer. Related: LNG Prices Are In A Tailspin Due To Warmer Weather

Yet, LNG is the energy development to watch as the two sides try to hammer out an agreement. China has placed a 10 percent tariff on U.S.-LNG imports with the threat of increasing that figure in the future, resulting in China having to find alternate sources of the super-cooled fuel on the spot market. The downside for China is that it also needs U.S. sourced LNG as its insatiable gas demand expands amid Beijing's mandate that gas make up at least 10 percent of its power generation energy mix by 2020, with further earmarks set for 2030.

LNG is the prize

The U.S. LNG sector also needs Chinese participation, however. Many of the so-called second wave of U.S. LNG projects that are now being planned and/or receiving federal approval will have a difficult time reaching the all-important final investment decision (FID) needed to go forward without Chinese assistance. These projects not only need to sign long-term off-take agreements with Chinese entities, but many of them, particularly newcomers not backed by more experienced oil and gas majors, will need Chinese financing to go ahead.

While it remains to be seen if Washington and Beijing can iron out their trade differences, it would be beneficial for both sides’ energy sectors to at least reach some sort of deal that would allow the free trade of energy between the two super powers. At the end of the day, two realities remain: the U.S. is now an energy (oil and gas) producing super power alongside the ranks of Russia and Saudi Arabia, while China, conversely, is the world’s largest energy consumer, which gives it less leverage in ongoing trade and even geopolitical negotiations and developments.

By Tim Daiss for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Bob on December 03 2018 said:
    Exactly, a deal on LNG is key to solving the trade war between China and the US, a solution that is easily at hand, as the article states, with China as the world's largest energy importer, and US now an energy super power.

Leave a comment





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News