• 2 days Venezuelan Crude Exports To U.S. Fall To 15-year Lows
  • 2 days Mexico Blames Brazil For Failing Auction
  • 2 days Norway Allows Eni To Restart Goliat Oil Field In Barents Sea
  • 2 days Malaysia Suggests Muslim Countries Stop Trading Oil In U.S. Dollars
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Wins Appeal To Start Trans Mountain Work
  • 3 days Mexico Cancels Deepwater JV Tender Due To Lack Of Interest
  • 3 days Oil Drillers Give Cold Shoulder To Alaska Bidding Round
  • 3 days Budweiser Bets On Tesla To Replace Its Fleet
  • 3 days Forties Pipeline And Nearby Terminal Disrupted After Oil Leak
  • 3 days Major Nigerian Union Threatens Strike After Mass Firing Of New Members
  • 4 days China’s Sinopec Sues Venezuela’s PDVSA Over Unpaid Debts
  • 4 days Chevron Cuts Total 2018 Capex, Boosts U.S. Shale Investment
  • 4 days Shell Idles Six Nigerian Power Plants After Gas Shortage
  • 4 days London Firms To Visit Saudi Arabia As Battle For Aramco Listing Continues
  • 4 days East Timor Is Running Out of Oil
  • 4 days Withdrawal From OPEC Deal Could Take 6 Months To Negotiate
  • 4 days India’s Largest Refiner Looks To Ditch Oil In Favor Of Renewables
  • 4 days Protestors Shut Down A Minnesota Wells Fargo Over Oil Investments
  • 4 days U.S. Energy Secretary Discusses LNG Exports To Saudi Arabia
  • 5 days China’s CNOOC Spends Big In Panic Hoard of LNG
  • 5 days Asia May Return To Mid-East Crude As Mexican Supply Tightens
  • 5 days Enbridge Restarts Controversial Line 5 After Shutdown
  • 5 days South Sudan Stills Owes $1.3B Oil Payments To Sudan
  • 5 days Oil Prices Fall After API Reports Huge Build In Gasoline Inventories
  • 6 days Rosneft Takes On Massive Debt As US Sanctions Mount
  • 6 days Kinder Morgan Announces Further Trans Mountain Pipeline Delays
  • 6 days API Announces Voluntary Methane Reduction Program
  • 6 days Statoil Plans $6B Development At Huge Arctic Oil Field
  • 6 days South Sudan Hopes Higher Oil Prices Will Restore Ravaged Economy
  • 6 days China Launches New Gas Pipeline Amid Soaring Demand
  • 6 days Total’s $16B Ultra-Deepwater Project In Jeopardy
  • 6 days OPEC’s November Output Drops 300,000 Bpd
  • 6 days Exxon’s Beaumont Refinery To Remain Partially Offline
  • 6 days Engie To Ditch Natural Gas By 2050
  • 6 days Aberdeen University Launches World’s First Oil Decommissioning Simulator
  • 7 days China Orders Regions To ‘Regulate’ Surging Natural Gas Prices
  • 7 days Exxon Looks To Enter Egypt’s Upstream Oil And Gas
  • 7 days Tax Bill Supports Oil And Gas Industry, API President Says
  • 9 days Blackstone Teams Up With Brazilian Partner To Buy $6B Gas Pipeline
  • 9 days Tesla Faces New Sales Challenges In Germany
Alt Text

The Super Basin Behind U.S. NatGas Dominance

Strong output growth from some…

Alt Text

54 Things You Didn’t Know About Natural Gas

While crude oil coal get…

Alt Text

Egypt Takes Giant Step Towards Energy Independence

A recently discovered gas field…

Carbon Emission Regulations Could Jeopardize Multi Billion LNG Projects

Carbon Emission Regulations Could Jeopardize Multi Billion LNG Projects

Natural gas is increasingly being viewed as one of the most important sources of fuel in the coming decades. That is why Royal Dutch Shell, an oil major, made a huge bet on liquefied natural gas (LNG) when it decided to purchase BG Group, which has major holdings in LNG projects in Australia and East Africa.

But what if the industry’s expectations for the growth in LNG demand are wildly optimistic? At issue is how deep governments around the world cut their carbon emissions in an effort to slow climate change. Natural gas does offer some climate benefits over coal as a source of electricity – it burns cleaner and releases less carbon dioxide.

However, it is still a fossil fuel and carbon restrictions could keep a lid on the demand scenarios for LNG. In a new study, the Carbon Tracker Initiative (CTI) finds that there could be $283 billion in planned LNG assets that may not be needed over the next decade, and if companies move forward on them, they could wind up with stranded assets. An overwhelming portion of these high-cost LNG projects are slated to be constructed in the U.S., Canada, and Australia. Related: EIA Data Still Diverging From Reality

CTI concludes that there is a cost threshold past which LNG projects will be unnecessary. Normally markets balance out depending on supply and demand, but in a carbon-constrained world, the market maxes out at a certain carbon limit. So, any planned capacity beyond that limit will be forced out of the market. And since buyers will choose the lowest cost options first, once the “carbon budget” is filled with cheaper LNG, the more expensive LNG is forced out. CTI zeros in on a specific price beyond which LNG projects will be stranded, and it is equivalent to the cost of delivering LNG to Japan for $10 per million Btu (MMBtu). Low-cost projects that can come in under that level will likely find buyers. But carbon limits will make any expensive projects above the $10 threshold unworkable.

Moreover, CTI finds that the vast majority of LNG projects that could survive are the ones that have already received final investment decisions and/or are under construction or already in operation. There is only a limited opportunity for additional capacity, and there have to be specific conditions for them to work. Brownfield projects in the Pacific could make the cut, along with some U.S. projects, and LNG from Mozambique (which could serve India). Related: The Story Behind Inflated World Oil Reserves

Still, that leaves an enormous volume of unneeded LNG. Dozens of companies scrambled to draw up plans to develop LNG terminals when prices were high. CTI says that $283 billion of new LNG projects over the next decade may not move forward if their prognosis is correct. That includes $82 billion worth of LNG in Canada, $71 billion in the U.S., and $68 billion in Australia. These projects won’t be needed given limits on carbon.

CTI catalogues the amount of projects on the drawing board that won’t be needed and which companies are heading them up. The list is long, but BG Group leads the pack – soon to be taken over by Shell – along with Shell itself, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Petronas, Woodside Petroleum, and Apache, among others. Related: Cyber Threat Has Oil And Gas Majors On Edge

Of course, given the long lead times to build up LNG export facilities, that money has not been committed. And unlike, say, oil or coal production, LNG projects usually line up buyers before they move forward with construction. That means there is less of a risk that the market will suddenly disappear on them. Companies can avoid being left with stranded assets and huge financial losses by simply not moving forward with an unnecessary project.

On the other hand, many LNG developers may be working with entirely different demand scenarios than CTI, ignoring the looming threat of carbon restrictions. That could put them and their shareholders in danger if they decide to commit billions of dollars to high-cost LNG projects.

Yet, if policymakers around the world fail to take action to reduce global emissions, the market for LNG could be much larger than CTI predicts. In fact, that could be the scenario which the industry is betting on.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 1: source: Carbon Tracker Initiative

By James Stafford of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News