• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 4 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 2 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 5 hours EV future has been postponed
My Top Energy Stock Pick for 2024

My Top Energy Stock Pick for 2024

Oversupply and lower domestic prices…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Natural Gas Markets Remain Ultra Tight

marcellus rig

Natural gas prices skyrocketed this week, shooting above $4.80 per MMBtu on Wednesday, a price last seen during the polar vortex of 2014.

Low gas inventories are leaving the market on edge, and volatility has roared back to the market. In this column only a week ago, I marveled at prices soaring to $3.50/MMBtu, which marked a 15 percent increase over the prior two months. However, in the last seven days, prices are up a further 30 percent.

The factors behind the price increase are the same as they have been for quite a while now. U.S. natural gas inventories are at a 15-year low for this time of year, just as we head into the winter drawdown season. U.S. natural gas inventories stood at 3,247 billion cubic feet (Bcf) for the week ending on November 9, or 528 Bcf less than at this point in 2017, and 601 Bcf below the five-year average. In other words, the U.S. has a thin buffer of storage to fall back on in the event of a sudden bout of cold weather.

(Click to enlarge)

And it is exactly that variable that helped spark the most recent rally in prices. Reports that cold weather has arrived in much of the U.S. already, plus indications that the upcoming winter could be an unusually cold one, helped fuel this week’s rally. Natural gas had traded below $3/MMBtu for much of this year, but climbed roughly 50 percent since mid-September.

Just a few weeks ago, Bank of America Merrill Lynch said that given the backdrop of a 15-year low for inventories, any unexpected cold weather could push prices up as high as $5/MMBtu. That may have looked a little aggressive at the time, but now appears rather prescient.

A few other factors have played their part. “[E]arly-season cold, production freeze-offs, and the ramp up of exports from Corpus Christi – have shocked the gas market in ways not seen since the Polar Vortex winter of 2013/14,” Barclays said in a note.

The bank estimates that since the weekend, freeze-offs have disrupted about 2 Bcf/d of pipeline flows, about three-quarters of which came in Texas. These disruptions could extend into next week. Skyrocketing associated gas production in the Permian heightens the potential disruption to supply from freeze-offs. Related: Canadian Oil Producer Calls For Production Cap Amid Record Low Prices

Finally, trader positioning also played a role in Wednesday’s price spike. Prices broke through technical resistance levels over the last few days and traders likely closed out short positions en masse, driving prices higher.

What happens next? The only certainty is that prices in the short run will be volatile. On Wednesday, prices spiked to $4.80/MMBtu. But by Thursday, prices crashed again, falling by more than 15 percent. The EIA’s storage data showed a slight build in inventories, taking some of the steam out of Wednesday’s panicked buying spree.

But the small cushion of storage still leaves the U.S. market highly vulnerable to additional price spikes. As we saw in 2014, when the polar vortex temporarily pushed prices above $7/MMBtu, extreme cold weather can entirely upend even the most careful price forecast.

“2018 has been a year of weather extremes in the US, including the coldest April in 35 years, the hottest May-Sept on record, and the first colder-than-normal Oct in 9 years,” Morgan Stanley said in a note. “November is following the trend, with the current forecast one of the coldest since 2000.”

The dip in the mercury means that power plants are ramping up to provide heating for much of the country, which could further slice into inventories.

But as we saw Thursday, price spikes can go too far. Barclays warned about this in a note just after Wednesday’s rally, anticipating Thursday’s price correction. “[B]ulls could not have hoped for better weather to start the winter,” the investment bank wrote on Thursday. The bank argued that the price spike is likely temporary. “A regression to the mean poses real downside risks to prices,” Barclays warned. A few hours after that report was published, prices began to crash. Related: A New Era For Mexican Energy

Morgan Stanley also got ahead of the price correction. “We see modest downside from here assuming current weather forecasts, but a very wide range of potential short-term prices,” Morgan Stanley said in a note. The investment bank says that with Henry Hub prices north of $4/MMBtu, they have “now modestly over-corrected to the upside.”


The market looks tight now, but heading into next year, the shortages should clear up. “Beyond this winter, we continue to see structural oversupply,” Morgan Stanley wrote.

Other analysts generally agree on this point. “[R]ecord-high US natural gas production points to a brief (and expensive) intermezzo, especially as the high price should dampen demand from electricity providers,” Commerzbank said in a November 15 note.

While most forecasters see the price spikes as temporary, the next few weeks and months will likely be characterized by high volatility. “NYMEX has posted large jumps of 28¢, 31¢, and more than 50¢ in the past eight sessions, and implied volatility has increased to its highest level since at least 2010,” Barclays said.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • bongstar420 on November 15 2018 said:
    For such a cold November on a "low" inventory, we still added more than last year. Let us have price spikes when the inventory won't last and supply is on the decline.

    It seems the weather is more "justification" for the pricing than there actually is any need given they could just stop exports for the winter to more than offset any "threat" to "low" inventories. We do not exist in a market which is driven by fundamentals.
  • Randy Verret on November 16 2018 said:
    Well, per the norm, everyone seems to be fixated on commodity price, market dynamics & production. Great. What about transportation bottlenecks? What is it...about SIX (?) major pipelines that are currently "stalled" in the northeast due to permits hung-up in lawsuits or agency (i.e. NY DEQ) decisions? How does this lack of take-away capacity for Marcellus & Utica shale gas factor into the equation? We have PLENTY of supply (PA, OH, WVA) in the northeast. But, the "Keep it in the Ground" types have ground several major FERC pipeline projects to a halt which may very well have an impact on natural gas supply this winter. Let's just keep this in mind so as this situation potentially unravels, BLAME is affixed to the appropriate parties...Short-sighted government officials & activist Environmental NGO's, NOT the ENERGY PROVIDERS...
  • Gumby on November 16 2018 said:
    It is kind of amusing that we are still not serious about adding more solar energy to replace natural gas used for heating or even firewood.. on top of installing even more batteries to store electricity for heating overnight.. Heating space and water usually takes up two thirds of all utiltiy bills no matter which fuel is used generally.. our solar energy and wind power program is addressing only one third of that.. We are still a long way from totally clean energy that removes firewood, fuel oil, natural gas, coal, etc.. looks like it will take forever because population still grows and we are chasing it.. Yet, our solar energy program is growing so slowly in light of all that above... I see no point ??
  • Dan on November 16 2018 said:
    Solar won't gain much because the areas that need the heat are overcast too much during Fall, Winter,Spring. You really need two sources of power then and then solar becomes non cost effective. It's not polar vortex time yet but some scientists are saying mini ice age may be here because of lack of sun spots. Natural Gas at $8 or $9 used to be the norm until the market crash and massive government intervention became the norm for a non capitalism market. If we have a mini ice age just sit back with popcorn and watch the show. Solar doesn't do too well in mini ice ages so beware that investment.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News