• 9 hours Russia Approves Profit-Based Oil Tax For 2019
  • 13 hours French Strike Disrupts Exxon And Total’s Oil Product Shipments
  • 15 hours Kurdistan’s Oil Exports Still Below Pre-Conflict Levels
  • 17 hours Oil Production Cuts Taking A Toll On Russia’s Economy
  • 19 hours Aramco In Talks With Chinese Petrochemical Producers
  • 20 hours Federal Judge Grants Go-Ahead On Keystone XL Lawsuit
  • 22 hours Maduro Names Chavez’ Cousin As Citgo Boss
  • 1 day Bidding Action Heats Up In UK’s Continental Shelf
  • 1 day Keystone Pipeline Restart Still Unknown
  • 2 days UK Offers North Sea Oil Producers Tax Relief To Boost Investment
  • 2 days Iraq Wants To Build Gas Pipeline To Kuwait In Blow To Shell
  • 2 days Trader Trafigura Raises Share Of Oil Purchases From State Firms
  • 2 days German Energy Group Uniper Rejects $9B Finnish Takeover Bid
  • 2 days Total Could Lose Big If It Pulls Out Of South Pars Deal
  • 2 days Dakota Watchdog Warns It Could Revoke Keystone XL Approval
  • 3 days Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Major Crude Draw
  • 3 days Citgo President And 5 VPs Arrested On Embezzlement Charges
  • 3 days Gazprom Speaks Out Against OPEC Production Cut Extension
  • 3 days Statoil Looks To Lighter Oil To Boost Profitability
  • 3 days Oil Billionaire Becomes Wind Energy’s Top Influencer
  • 3 days Transneft Warns Urals Oil Quality Reaching Critical Levels
  • 3 days Whitefish Energy Suspends Work In Puerto Rico
  • 3 days U.S. Authorities Arrest Two On Major Energy Corruption Scheme
  • 3 days Thanksgiving Gas Prices At 3-Year High
  • 4 days Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 4 days South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 4 days Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 4 days Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 4 days ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 6 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 7 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 7 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 7 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 7 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 7 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 7 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 7 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 7 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 8 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
Alt Text

Norway’s $35B Oil Stock Dump Could Hurt The Industry

The world’s largest sovereign wealth…

Alt Text

Iran: Most OPEC Producers Back Extension Of Cuts

The majority of OPEC members…

Alt Text

Energy Majors Hit Hard By Climate Regulations

Siemens and General Electric have…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Who Would Be The Best Presidential Candidate For Energy Companies?

Who Would Be The Best Presidential Candidate For Energy Companies?

As the 2016 presidential race starts to heat up it is time to take a look at the remaining serious candidates and what each one might mean for energy policies and energy companies in the U.S. While a lot can happen in the next couple of months, the current leaders for the Republican Party are Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio. For the Democrats, the race will likely come down to a long brawl between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. As a bonus, it’s also worth looking at what Michael Bloomberg might do for energy if he enters the Presidential race and wins.

Donald Trump

Defying skeptics and conventional wisdom Donald Trump appears to be a real possibility as the Republican Presidential nominee. Trump disappointed with a second place finish in Iowa’s caucuses, but he is doing well in New Hampshire and nationally in the polls. Should Trump win the nomination and then the election, it is likely that oil and natural gas companies would get a big boost. Trump has actively discussed his interest in confronting OPEC and making the U.S. energy independent. He is a firm advocate for oil and its importance in the overall U.S. economy. A Trump presidency would definitely help investors in most conventional energy companies, especially if the Republicans retain control of Congress as many are projecting. Related: Despite Bold Predictions, T. Boone Pickens Sells All Oil Holdings

Ted Cruz

Despite being a Republican, Cruz is perhaps not as favorably inclined towards energy companies as Trump or Rubio. Cruz is cited as opposing all energy subsidies including those for oil companies. While he has supported revoking offshore drilling moratoriums in the past, it is very unclear at this stage if that point would be relevant for energy companies given the current price of oil. Cruz is a supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline, however, and has supported the view that global warming is a natural phenomenon rather than manmade.

Macro Rubio

Rubio appears to be a supporter of conventional fossil fuels like Trump and Cruz. In particular, Rubio is in favor of stopping the EPA’s clean Power Plan, which would likely help certain utility companies tremendously and could provide a small boost to coal miners. Rubio as President would also considerably diminish the power of the EPA as a regulatory authority instead giving more of a role to states and local governments. This would likely help many conventional energy companies. Related: Despite Huge Losses Oil Companies Reluctant To Shut In Production

Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton as president would likely continue many of the policies advocated by President Obama. For instance, Clinton has been cited as being against offshore oil drilling, against the Keystone XL pipeline, and against drilling in the Arctic.

In addition, Clinton supported the December 2015 Paris Climate Accord. All of this suggests she would likely be inclined towards new regulations that would harm utilities, conventional energy companies, and automakers. As a staunch advocate of environmental policies, Clinton would likely take various actions to support solar and wind power companies. With the recent passage of continuing subsidies for those industries, it is unclear what additional concrete measures Clinton could take to help renewable energy companies, so a Clinton Presidency might have a muted effect on those firms. It would likely have a pronounced negative impact on all conventional energy firms. Related: Tesla Falling Out Of Favor With Investors

Bernie Sanders

Sanders is arguably even more progressive than Hillary Clinton, so it is likely that he would adopt all of the same policies as Clinton or Obama, and potentially put even greater restrictions on conventional energy production. While Obama’s proposed $10-per-barrel tax on oil is not going to happen during his presidency, if Sanders were to become president, it is possible circumstances could arise that would allow him to implement that tax, which of course would be extremely damaging to oil companies. Sanders is also in favor of a tax on carbon emissions which would have wide ranging impacts for numerous businesses across a variety of industries. By and large then, a Sanders presidency would likely be harmful for most major U.S. manufactures and energy companies.

Michael Bloomberg

If Michael Bloomberg does end up entering the race and running for President it could certainly throw both political parties into turmoil. Should Bloomberg become President, it’s likely that he would represent a middle ground between anti-renewables policies of the Republicans and anti-conventional energy policies of the Democrats. Bloomberg has certainly shown support for climate initiatives and environmental concerns. The coal industry, however, would not be spared. Bloomberg has spent a lot of money trying to kill off coal plants in the United States.

However, Bloomberg has also shown a steak of non-ideological pragmatism that includes being willing to approve the Keystone XL pipeline under certain conditions. Given that pragmatism and his reputation as a centrist, Bloomberg would likely have a positive impact on both conventional energy companies and renewables firms alike.

By Michael McDonald Of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • jack on February 08 2016 said:
    The 'best,' referring to high(est) oil prices would be hillary, hands down. Liberals love quantitative easing, which kill the usd, so...
    and she's pretty much, despite all the bluster, in the pockets of ANY special interest group that comes her way. The saudis already have - in a big way.
  • Frank on February 08 2016 said:
    Trump would also encourage investment in the US in general, improving the overall domestic economy and well-being of the average American. He and Sanders are different from the other candidates in that their focus is on the American polity and citizenry, rather than on the world as a whole. As a result, with Trump we might see a citizenry that doesn't demand wealth redistribution, because he'd work to restore the middle class.

    It's difficult to know Trump's true positions; He could in truth be more environmental like Bloomberg. Trump is a Republican, but he has been a Democrat. Like Bloomberg, Trump is from New York.

    We do know Trump is very domestic-oriented; so most every domestic business should benefit, as opposed to those businesses that are more transnational. And yes, clearly I like Trump best.

    The Koch Brothers, Wilks brothers, Robert Mercer, Toby Neugebauer, Club for Growth, and others have all given to Cruz; so, I assume they either believe in his candidacy or expect something in return. Rubio is likely the most for sale, judging by his Gang of Eight bill which went out of its way to serve special interests.
  • Pavlak on March 02 2016 said:
    Hillary Clinton's presidency would be good for investors in the alternative energy sector. Donald Trump's policies on the other had might boost prospects for investors in most conventional energy companies, but would have a negative impact on the alternative energy sector. As for the others - nobody cares

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News