• 2 hours Oil Nears $52 With Record OPEC Deal Compliance
  • 5 hours Saudi Aramco CEO Affirms IPO On Track For H2 2018
  • 7 hours Canadia Ltd. Returns To Sudan For First Time Since Oil Price Crash
  • 8 hours Syrian Rebel Group Takes Over Oil Field From IS
  • 3 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 4 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 4 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 5 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 5 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 7 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 7 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
Alt Text

Oil Fundamentals Overturn Geopolitical Risk

Geopolitical risk from Iraq and…

Alt Text

What’s Stopping An Oil Price Rally?

Oil prices rallied in Q3…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Ukraine’s Yulia Timoshenko - Victim or Crook?

Ukraine’s Yulia Timoshenko - Victim or Crook?

The courts have spoken - Ukraine’s former Prime Minister Yulia Volodymyrivna Timoshenko has received a seven year prison sentence from Judge Rodion Kireyev of Kiev’s Pechersk Court, convicted of the abuse of power while negotiating natural gas contracts with Russia in 2009.

The ruling also adjudged that the agreements damaged Ukraine’s Naftogaz Ukrayiny to the level of roughly $191 million, for which Ms. Timoshenko is liable.

Justice served or justice denied?

Bit of both, actually – with enormous potential consequences for Ukraine’s energy future.
Quite aside from her incarnation, Ms. Timoshenko has been ordered to repay “all material damage” she caused to state-owned Naftogaz Ukrayiny to be paid back in full, a fine assessed at $191 million.

Her crime?

In 2009 Timoshenko negotiated a contract between Gazprom and Naftogaz Ukrainy on purchase and transit fees. Prosecutors allege that in doing so, Timoshenko, then Prime Minister, abused her authority for personal benefit, violating Article 19 of the Ukrainian Constitution.

Timoshenko reportedly during the 1990s increased prices for Russian natural gas imports while head of the common energy systems of Ukraine, to take revenge on current President Victor Yanukovych.

The European Union has already weighed in the verdict, with EU foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton stating that the Ukrainian government ensures that Ms. Timoshenko a transparent and fair appeals process, as a failure to do so would have "profound implications" for Ukraine-EU relations.

Ms. Timoshenko’s tycoon background? 

During 1995- 1997 Timoshenko was the president of Ukraine’s natural gas trading company United Energy Systems of Ukraine, which became Ukraine’s main importer of Russian natural gas to Ukraine. Accusations swirled that she was reselling enormous quantities of stolen gas and avoiding tax, having given former Prime Minister Pavlo Lazarenko kickbacks in exchange for her company's access. In August 2006 Lazarenko was convicted and sentenced to prison in the United States for money laundering, wire fraud and extortion.

Interesting company the Ukraine’s “gas princess” keeps, along with her personal wealth estimated in the millions. That said, Ms. Timoshenko is simply a product of her environment, and the 2009 natural gas deal that she cut with Russia was pragmatic, which raises the question of why she’s on the rack now.

Speaking of personal fortunes – in the past two decades it has been impossible for anyone in the post-Soviet space to become rich.

Why?

Simple – because theoretically, according to Marxism, “property is theft” and in December 1991 every Soviet citizen following the collapse of the USSR started out on the same starting line.

Not – those with connections prospered, those on the assembly line did not. Timoshenko, cagey about her private wealth and reinventing herself as a populist politician, was nonetheless one of the former.

Why is the EU so interested in Ms. Timoshenko’s fate?

Because the case opens so many cans of nasty worms, including the EU’s growing dependency on Russian energy imports, much of which travels via Ukraine through Soviet-era pipelines, but its commitment to political evolution in Eastern Europe and the post-Soviet space, which makes the fate of such a high-profile detainee as Ms. Timoshenko a matter that ought, nor, needs, to be addressed.

But how to indicate to Kiev that such actions are unacceptable whilst ensuring gas flow? 

Startlingly, even Moscow also reacted harshly to the conviction, with the Russian Federation Foreign Ministry noting that "many states and the world public perceive this entire judicial process as initiated for purely political reasons."

So, where’s the compromise? Some Ukrainian analysts have speculated that the leadership in Kiev could attempt to save face by pardoning her, which would alleviate Timoshenko from doing hard time but under Ukrainian law, bar her from further participation in the country's politics.

Expect such a deal so Russian natural gas shipments to Europe continue uninterrupted. If Moscow is pressuring Kiev over the case, some democratic lipstick whitewash will need to be applied to the Ukrainian judicial pig in an attempt to convert it into a judicial silk purse, but the fix already seems to be in, and its seems to be less about justice than settling political scores.

At least Timoshenko isn’t facing U.S. justice, where her Prime Minister predecessor in 2006 got a nine-year sentence.

After all, gotta keep those Europeans warm… especially as they pay their bills on time.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Truth on March 18 2012 said:
    Interesting how people from countries with enormous debts and relatively buoyant economies, complain about a country with a fledgling and poor economy not paying a bill immediately. A shameful and nonconstructive stance to take.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News