Saudi Arabia is taking a massive gamble on the world oil markets. Their “pump at any price” policy has driven oil down to below $50 per barrel and, so far, appears to be having the desired effect of squeezing out marginal producers, particularly in the shale industry, unable to cover costs at that level.
Every spike above $50, as happened last week, is met by a wave of hedging from shale companies. Late last week, U.S. producers locked in new production at north of $50 for 2016 and 2017 delivery. As prices reached about $53, any further rise was limited by sellers locking in prices. Even so only some 11 percent of expected 2016 production is forward sold according to IHS Energy, quoted in Reuters.
Source: Financial Times
The Saudis had hoped they could drive down the price enough to squeeze out higher cost upstarts in the U.S. shale industry. Indeed, the U.S. government is quoted in the FT reporting that, after adding 1 million barrels per day per year of production in every year since 2012, next year will see the first decline, from 9.3 million bpd to 8.9 million bpd. Related: Airstrikes Have Yet To Stop ISIS Oil Industry
Emptying the Prince’s Trust Fund to Strangle the Shale Drillers
This has been achieved by Saudi Arabia at a high price though, as more than $1 trillion of future investment spending has been shelved across the globe and between 250,000 and 300,000 workers have lost their generally high-paid jobs there.
Source: Financial Times
The kingdom itself will see its $246 billion 2014 oil and gas revenue fall by about 45 percent and will rack up a government budget deficit of $130 billion this year compared to 2013’s surplus of $48 billion. The Saudi government has ample central bank reserves, some $370 billion according to the FT, but they are rapidly burning through the next generation’s wealth as they pacify domestic unrest with generous subsidies and social programs. Related: Current Oil Price Rally Will Fizzle Out Say Analysts
Oil Market Reshalience
To think that the ruling elite of Saudi Arabia can drive the entire U.S. shale industry out of business, though, is a fallacy. Marginal producers such as the UK’s North Sea will see new fields shelved and some closed never to be reopened, while Arctic and deep-water reserves are not likely to be economically viable for years, if ever. The U.S. shale industry plays to a different tune as a recent FT Briefing by Spencer Dale explained.
First, and I paraphrase, shale oil is likely to respond far more quickly to changes in prices than conventional oil production. The lead times between investment decisions and production of U.S. shale can be measured in weeks, rather than the years taken for conventional production. And the life of a shale well tends to be far shorter than that of a conventional well, with production typically falling by as much as 70-80 percent in the first year.
As such, as prices fall, investment and drilling activity will quickly decline and production will soon follow. But as prices recover, U.S. shale is likely to bounce quickly back. In this respect, shale oil becomes the new swing producer, whether U.S. shale companies like it or not.
The Banking Equation
Second, U.S. shale producers are far more exposed to the vagaries of the banking system. Relative to the major national and independent oil companies that dominate conventional supplies, shale producers are much smaller, more highly geared and most are dependent on a continuous flow of borrowing to fund the investments needed to maintain production levels. As prices fall, banks are less willing to lend, curtailing investment. The current wave of hedging can be seen, in this light, as an attempt by those that have moved down the cost curve to protect their ongoing borrowing costs by locking in profits at a low, but still profitable, level. Related: Oil Sands Down But Far From Out
Third, shale has introduced manufacturing-like processes into the oil industry. The same rigs are used to drill multiple wells using the same processes in similar locations. This differs from the large-scale, bespoke engineering projects that typify many conventional oil projects.
Lean and Mean
As with many repeated manufacturing processes, U.S. shale is generating strong productivity gains. Productivity growth in U.S. shale, as measured by initial production per rig, averaged in excess of 30 percent a year between 2007 and 2014. Lean manufacturing, if you like. To what extent this process can continue remains to be seen, but the current low prices are certainly driving innovation in a way that $100 prices did not.
In the medium term, this drop in exploration and production is painful for workers, suppliers and investors in the sector, but it is worse for conventional producers where closed production may never be restarted. Rather than drive out U.S. shale production, Saudi Arabia is ensuring that it becomes ever more competitive. The real casualties will be deep water and remote high cost producers like the UK, Russia, Brazil and so on.
By Stuart Burns
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
- Iran Could Trigger A Resource War On Several Fronts Other Than Oil
- Canadian Utilities Embarking On Asset Acquisition Strategy In U.S.
- The End Of The Oil Major?