• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 5 hours The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 6 days e-truck insanity
  • 1 day How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 5 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 4 days James Corbett Interviews Irina Slav of OILPRICE.COM - "Burn, Hollywood, Burn!" - The Corbett Report
  • 4 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
  • 6 days Biden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs
  • 6 days "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
  • 9 days Bankruptcy in the Industry
What Does Renationalizing Thames Water Mean?

What Does Renationalizing Thames Water Mean?

While pundits discuss the necessity…

Iran Adapts to Shifting Tides in South Caucasus

Iran Adapts to Shifting Tides in South Caucasus

Iran is facing diplomatic challenges…

Metal Miner

Metal Miner

MetalMiner is the largest metals-related media site in the US according to third party ranking sites. With a preemptive global perspective on the issues, trends,…

More Info

Premium Content

U.S. Shale Is Too Adaptive For The Saudis To Kill

U.S. Shale Is Too Adaptive For The Saudis To Kill

 Saudi Arabia is taking a massive gamble on the world oil markets. Their “pump at any price” policy has driven oil down to below $50 per barrel and, so far, appears to be having the desired effect of squeezing out marginal producers, particularly in the shale industry, unable to cover costs at that level.

Every spike above $50, as happened last week, is met by a wave of hedging from shale companies. Late last week, U.S. producers locked in new production at north of $50 for 2016 and 2017 delivery. As prices reached about $53, any further rise was limited by sellers locking in prices. Even so only some 11 percent of expected 2016 production is forward sold according to IHS Energy, quoted in Reuters.


Source: Financial Times

The Saudis had hoped they could drive down the price enough to squeeze out higher cost upstarts in the U.S. shale industry. Indeed, the U.S. government is quoted in the FT reporting that, after adding 1 million barrels per day per year of production in every year since 2012, next year will see the first decline, from 9.3 million bpd to 8.9 million bpd. Related: Airstrikes Have Yet To Stop ISIS Oil Industry

Emptying the Prince’s Trust Fund to Strangle the Shale Drillers

This has been achieved by Saudi Arabia at a high price though, as more than $1 trillion of future investment spending has been shelved across the globe and between 250,000 and 300,000 workers have lost their generally high-paid jobs there.


Source: Financial Times

The kingdom itself will see its $246 billion 2014 oil and gas revenue fall by about 45 percent and will rack up a government budget deficit of $130 billion this year compared to 2013’s surplus of $48 billion. The Saudi government has ample central bank reserves, some $370 billion according to the FT, but they are rapidly burning through the next generation’s wealth as they pacify domestic unrest with generous subsidies and social programs. Related: Current Oil Price Rally Will Fizzle Out Say Analysts

Oil Market Reshalience

To think that the ruling elite of Saudi Arabia can drive the entire U.S. shale industry out of business, though, is a fallacy. Marginal producers such as the UK’s North Sea will see new fields shelved and some closed never to be reopened, while Arctic and deep-water reserves are not likely to be economically viable for years, if ever. The U.S. shale industry plays to a different tune as a recent FT Briefing by Spencer Dale explained.

First, and I paraphrase, shale oil is likely to respond far more quickly to changes in prices than conventional oil production. The lead times between investment decisions and production of U.S. shale can be measured in weeks, rather than the years taken for conventional production. And the life of a shale well tends to be far shorter than that of a conventional well, with production typically falling by as much as 70-80 percent in the first year.

As such, as prices fall, investment and drilling activity will quickly decline and production will soon follow. But as prices recover, U.S. shale is likely to bounce quickly back. In this respect, shale oil becomes the new swing producer, whether U.S. shale companies like it or not.

The Banking Equation

Second, U.S. shale producers are far more exposed to the vagaries of the banking system. Relative to the major national and independent oil companies that dominate conventional supplies, shale producers are much smaller, more highly geared and most are dependent on a continuous flow of borrowing to fund the investments needed to maintain production levels. As prices fall, banks are less willing to lend, curtailing investment. The current wave of hedging can be seen, in this light, as an attempt by those that have moved down the cost curve to protect their ongoing borrowing costs by locking in profits at a low, but still profitable, level. Related: Oil Sands Down But Far From Out

Third, shale has introduced manufacturing-like processes into the oil industry. The same rigs are used to drill multiple wells using the same processes in similar locations. This differs from the large-scale, bespoke engineering projects that typify many conventional oil projects.


Lean and Mean

As with many repeated manufacturing processes, U.S. shale is generating strong productivity gains. Productivity growth in U.S. shale, as measured by initial production per rig, averaged in excess of 30 percent a year between 2007 and 2014. Lean manufacturing, if you like. To what extent this process can continue remains to be seen, but the current low prices are certainly driving innovation in a way that $100 prices did not.

In the medium term, this drop in exploration and production is painful for workers, suppliers and investors in the sector, but it is worse for conventional producers where closed production may never be restarted. Rather than drive out U.S. shale production, Saudi Arabia is ensuring that it becomes ever more competitive. The real casualties will be deep water and remote high cost producers like the UK, Russia, Brazil and so on.

By Stuart Burns

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Lee James on October 16 2015 said:
    Mideast producers formerly said of $100 crude, "the price is about right." Maybe they reconsidered and decided $100 crude is a bit on the greedy side. Maybe the world really can not afford that price. Perhaps it drives too much "oil curse" in some countries. Instead of building a better life for their citizens, a country can get into excesses and cross-border mischief with that kind of oil money.

    I'm of the opinion the Saudis know what they are doing. High-polluting U.S. unconventional petroleum production is rightfully dampened down. After all, we are the world's least clean with air and water resources when we rely on unconventional extraction methods. And we're the world's highest cost producer for that incremental barrel of fracked or deep-water fossil fuel.

    Things are right-sizing in fossil fuel production. Really, the whole world is getting with a different energy supply program. Even Texas is, despite appearances and political posturing.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News