• 3 minutes Biden Seeks $2 Trillion Clean Energy And Infrastructure Spending Boost
  • 5 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 8 minutes Gazprom fails to exempt Nord Stream-2 from EU market rules
  • 11 hours China wields coronavirus to nationalize American-owned carmaker
  • 1 day Trumpist lies about coronavirus too bad for Facebook - BANNED!
  • 11 hours Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 17 hours Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 1 day China's impending economic meltdown
  • 9 hours US will pay for companies to bring supply chains home from China: Kudlow - COVID-19 has highlighted the problem of relying too heavily on one country for production
  • 2 days Why Oil could hit $100
  • 2 days Pompeo upsets China; oil & gas prices to fall
  • 2 days The World is Facing a Solar Panel Waste Problem
  • 2 days The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
  • 17 hours Liquid Air Battery
  • 17 hours What the heroin industry can teach us about solar power (BBC)
  • 1 day Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 2 days Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
Michael Kern

Michael Kern

Michael Kern is a newswriter and editor at Safehaven.com, Oilprice.com, and a writer at Macro-Investing.com. 

More Info

Premium Content

Trump Proposes A $2 Trillion Infrastructure Intervention

As the United States continues to grapple with a growing number of coronavirus cases, President Donald Trump is calling on yet another trillion-dollar spending plan to help bolster the economy.

On Tuesday morning, U.S. President Donald Trump tweeted that Congress should pass a $2 trillion spending plan to revitalize the country's roads, bridges and other critical infrastructure, calling for it to be included in "Phase 4" of the country's measures to combat the impact of the COVID-19 crisis.

President Trump has been pushing for a major infrastructure bill since taking office four years ago. The President's tweet comes as lawmakers in both Congress and the Senate are weighing different plans to provide relief for Americans, though some have voiced concern about simply throwing money at the problem.

Related: Texas Oil Drillers Prepare To Halt Production

Democrat Nancy Pelosi, and two other house committee chairmen informed reporters that they would like the new plan to include measures to boost broadband accessibility, water infrastructure, and bolster health care options to better protect essential workers in the field. They also called for an extension of direct payments to Americans in this time of crisis.

A Trillion Here, A Trillion There...

Trump recently signed the $2.2 trillion economic relief package into legislation, targeting local businesses and employees impacted by the economic fallout of the COVID-19 crisis.

The 880-page, $2.2 trillion coronavirus stimulus package, which was passed and signed into law by President Trump last Friday, was one of the largest financial interventions the United States has ever seen, with significant amounts of money allocated to individuals, large corporations and local business-- and its approval in the Senate came despite issues on both sides of the aisle.

By Michael Kern for Oilprice.com 

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Lee James on April 01 2020 said:
    I find the notion of free money unsettling. You need to have a reasonable source for the funds, or you cut spending in other areas. Sounds like a good way for one Presidential administration to go down in history for buying a lot of newsworthy stuff while later administrations (and our children) pay and owe.

    If only our public folks could put together a rainy day fund in good times that does not leak like a sieve. Unfortunately, it's human nature to grab and spend, leaving someone else holding the bag.

    Naturally, the question of fossil fuel infrastructure will come up. Politics being what they are today, coal and oil will be deemed essential infrastructure and receive government funding. I ask how long will we continue to burn planet Earth to get our energy? And, isn't it a problem that the resource that we burn is the same stuff we fight over, internationally?

    Time to do energy differently. Produce energy locally and sustainably.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News