• 4 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 7 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 15 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 3 hours IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 49 mins Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 16 hours Old - New Kim: Nuclear Negotiations With U. S. Will Never Resume Unless Washington Changes Its Position
  • 12 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 15 hours India After Elections: Economy And Hindu Are The First Modi’s Challenges
  • 2 hours Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 9 hours Theresa May to Step Down
  • 2 hours Total nonsense in climate debate
  • 12 hours Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 4 hours IRAN makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . U.S. makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . IRAQ steps up and plays the mediator. THIS ALLOWS BOTH SIDES TO "SAVE FACE". Then serious negotiations start.
  • 227 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
  • 14 hours Compensation For A Trade War: Argentina’s Financial Crisis Creates An Opportunity For China
  • 10 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
Dan Dicker

Dan Dicker

Dan Dicker is a 25 year veteran of the New York Mercantile Exchange where he traded crude oil, natural gas, unleaded gasoline and heating oil…

More Info

Time to Look North of the Border

2014 has been a tough year to find value in energy.  With oil shale still representing the best investment opportunity in the United States but with the massive run that most US E+P's have already had, it's been tough to find value in the space.  That's why I'm starting to think that the remaining value in E+P might lie north of the border, in Canadian oil companies.  

The model for production and the risks between the US and Canadian companies I follow couldn't be more different, with US firms pursuing unconventional oil from horizontal hydraulic fracturing and Canadian firms generating growth from oil sands development, mostly in the Athabasca.  But in the end, value in the E+P space is related to price -- and with Canadian share prices staying steady while US companies soar, oil sands, as burdened as it is, is looking better all the time.

Of course, it is the Keystone pipeline controversy that helps keep the price of shares of Suncor (SU), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) and Cenovus (CNE) down.  Even if the further development of oil shale isn't much dependent upon Keystone, and other pipelines for transport are available, the overhang of Keystone as the symbol of oil sands remains.  A Keystone approval would be the ultimate signal for getting into these names.

But there are other, more fundamental reasons to own Canadian E+P.  While the costs of initiation of an oil sands "well" are greater than for a fracked well in West Texas, the costs to keep it running are far lower.  And, the life of an oil sands well is generally much longer too.   In terms of technology, there is nothing quite as advanced as the new shale stimulation techniques being used in fracked wells in West Texas.  But oil sands recovery hasn't stood still either -- it is no longer just ugly strip mining of bitumen in wide open pits.  Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, called SAGD, is an old technology that melts the bitumen underground with hot steam and then separates it from the water that comes back up.  But SAGD has moved forward too, using less water and able to recycle more of it.  As the environmental disadvantages of oil sands recovery continue to lessen and the costs continue to drop, these Canadian companies are going to be more and more competitive with US E+P's for refinery contracts.  

And then there are the local oil markets and their influence.  Benchmarked to West Texas…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News