• 4 minutes Nord Stream 2 Halt Possible Over Navalny Poisoning
  • 8 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 11 minutes JP Morgan says investors should prepare for rising odds of Trump win
  • 5 hours US after 4 more years of Trump?
  • 56 mins Famine, Economic Collapse of China on the Horizon?
  • 3 hours Something wicked this way comes
  • 3 hours Why NG falling n crude up?
  • 3 hours Permian in for Prosperous and Bright Future
  • 3 hours Oil giants partner with environmental group to track Permian Basin's methane emissions
  • 2 days Daniel Yergin Book is a Reality Check on Energy
  • 3 days Gepthermal fracking: how to confuse a greenie
  • 3 days YPF to redeploy rigs in Vaca Muerta on export potential
  • 1 day The Perfect Solution To Remove Conflict Problems In The South China East Asia Sea
  • 4 hours Top HHS official takes leave of absence after Facebook rant about CDC conspiracies
  • 7 hours Biden NOW says he supports Fracking
  • 2 days Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
Ross McCracken

Ross McCracken

Ross is an energy analyst, writer and consultant who was previously the Managing Editor of Platts Energy Economist

More Info

The IEA’s Search For A New Narrative Of Doom

The International Energy Agency (IEA) released its Oil 2019 report March 11, providing forecasts to 2024. The IEA paints an extraordinary picture of transition for the oil industry, but it is not the ‘energy transition’ driven by climate change; the impacts on the oil market of policies designed to mitigate climate change appear relatively weak over the next five years. The seismic changes illustrated by the IEA are those wrought by the US shale industry.

The IEA’s former narrative on US shale was that once it had burst upon the scene it would eventually burn itself out in the mid-2020s. The sweet spots would be exhausted, marginal costs would rise as oil became harder to locate, and more oil would constantly have to be found to replace the level of decline from wells drilled during the expansionary phase, eventually making it impossible to sustain growth – essentially the classic path of a conventional oil basin.

To a large extent this story remains in place, but it is also clearly under constant re-evaluation, the problem being that the depth and longevity of US shale is not known and remains a function of price and productivity – which means the ultimate recoverable reserve should be treated as elastic rather than finite.

If a bell curve in the style of Marion King Hubbert were used to predict US shale oil production, 2018’s mammoth expansion would have moved the predicted peak higher and further back in time, resulting…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News