• 4 minutes China's Economy and Subsequent Energy Demand To Decelerate Sharply Through 2024
  • 7 minutes Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 11 minutes Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 14 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 1 hour We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 38 mins Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 59 mins Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 5 hours Which emissions are worse?: Cows vs. Keystone Pipeline
  • 15 hours What's the Endgame Here?
  • 10 hours Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 47 mins Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
  • 6 hours Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 15 hours Turkey Muscles-In on Israel-Greece-Cyprus EastMed Gas Pipeline Deal. Erdogan Still Dreaming of Ottoman Empire II.
  • 22 hours Trump capitulated
  • 22 hours US Shale: Technology
  • 23 hours Gravity is a scam!
Ross McCracken

Ross McCracken

Ross is an energy analyst, writer and consultant who was previously the Managing Editor of Platts Energy Economist

More Info

The IEA’s Search For A New Narrative Of Doom

rig

The International Energy Agency (IEA) released its Oil 2019 report March 11, providing forecasts to 2024. The IEA paints an extraordinary picture of transition for the oil industry, but it is not the ‘energy transition’ driven by climate change; the impacts on the oil market of policies designed to mitigate climate change appear relatively weak over the next five years. The seismic changes illustrated by the IEA are those wrought by the US shale industry.

The IEA’s former narrative on US shale was that once it had burst upon the scene it would eventually burn itself out in the mid-2020s. The sweet spots would be exhausted, marginal costs would rise as oil became harder to locate, and more oil would constantly have to be found to replace the level of decline from wells drilled during the expansionary phase, eventually making it impossible to sustain growth – essentially the classic path of a conventional oil basin.

To a large extent this story remains in place, but it is also clearly under constant re-evaluation, the problem being that the depth and longevity of US shale is not known and remains a function of price and productivity – which means the ultimate recoverable reserve should be treated as elastic rather than finite.

If a bell curve in the style of Marion King Hubbert were used to predict US shale oil production, 2018’s mammoth expansion would have moved the predicted peak higher and further back in time, resulting…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News