• 4 minutes 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019
  • 7 minutes Nucelar Deal Is Dead? Iran Distances Itself Further From ND, Alarming Russia And France
  • 10 minutes Don Jr. Tweets name Ukraine Whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella. Worked for CIA during Obama Administration, Hold over to Trump National Security Counsel under Gen McCallister, more . . . .
  • 13 minutes Shale pioneer Chesepeak will file bankruptcy soon. FINALLY ! The consolidation begins
  • 25 mins EU has already lost the Trump vs. EU Trade War
  • 10 mins More dumbed down? re Hong Kong Act of Congress
  • 19 hours Impeachment S**te
  • 4 hours Pope Proposes New Sin: Thou Shalt Not Destroy The Harmony Of The Environment
  • 5 hours Article: Did Exxon only make $39 Million onshore U.S. last quarter ?
  • 1 day 55.00 WTI
  • 10 hours Visualizing Pennsylvania Oil & Gas Production (Through September 2019)
  • 7 hours U.S. Shale To Break Records Despite Bearish Rhetoric
  • 1 day Everything You Need To Know About Trump
  • 42 mins What are the odds of 4 U.S. politicians all having children working for Ukraine Gas Companies?
  • 1 day Water, Trump, and Israel’s National Security
  • 4 hours Last I Checked
  • 24 mins Petroleum Industry Domain Names
  • 1 hour U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
Ross McCracken

Ross McCracken

Ross is an energy analyst, writer and consultant who was previously the Managing Editor of Platts Energy Economist

More Info

The IEA’s Search For A New Narrative Of Doom

rig

The International Energy Agency (IEA) released its Oil 2019 report March 11, providing forecasts to 2024. The IEA paints an extraordinary picture of transition for the oil industry, but it is not the ‘energy transition’ driven by climate change; the impacts on the oil market of policies designed to mitigate climate change appear relatively weak over the next five years. The seismic changes illustrated by the IEA are those wrought by the US shale industry.

The IEA’s former narrative on US shale was that once it had burst upon the scene it would eventually burn itself out in the mid-2020s. The sweet spots would be exhausted, marginal costs would rise as oil became harder to locate, and more oil would constantly have to be found to replace the level of decline from wells drilled during the expansionary phase, eventually making it impossible to sustain growth – essentially the classic path of a conventional oil basin.

To a large extent this story remains in place, but it is also clearly under constant re-evaluation, the problem being that the depth and longevity of US shale is not known and remains a function of price and productivity – which means the ultimate recoverable reserve should be treated as elastic rather than finite.

If a bell curve in the style of Marion King Hubbert were used to predict US shale oil production, 2018’s mammoth expansion would have moved the predicted peak higher and further back in time, resulting…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News