• 13 hours Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Major Crude Draw
  • 14 hours Citgo President And 5 VPs Arrested On Embezzlement Charges
  • 14 hours Gazprom Speaks Out Against OPEC Production Cut Extension
  • 15 hours Statoil Looks To Lighter Oil To Boost Profitability
  • 16 hours Oil Billionaire Becomes Wind Energy’s Top Influencer
  • 17 hours Transneft Warns Urals Oil Quality Reaching Critical Levels
  • 18 hours Whitefish Energy Suspends Work In Puerto Rico
  • 19 hours U.S. Authorities Arrest Two On Major Energy Corruption Scheme
  • 1 day Thanksgiving Gas Prices At 3-Year High
  • 1 day Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 2 days South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 2 days Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 2 days Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 2 days Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 2 days ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 4 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 4 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 5 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 5 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 5 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 5 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 5 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 5 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 5 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 5 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 6 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 6 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 6 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 6 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 6 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 6 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 7 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 7 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 7 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 7 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 7 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 7 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 8 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 8 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 8 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
Alt Text

Iran: Most OPEC Producers Back Extension Of Cuts

The majority of OPEC members…

Alt Text

New Battery Design Could Crush Tesla

Elon Musk’s old rival, Henrik…

Alt Text

Is China Heading Toward An Energy-Debt Crisis?

China’s influence is often overlooked…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

The Halliburton-Baker Hughes Merger is Falling Apart. What Happens Next?

The Halliburton-Baker Hughes Merger is Falling Apart. What Happens Next?

The long wait is finally over; the U.S. Justice Department has announced it will sue to block the merger of Halliburton and Baker Hughes. This makes the merger much less likely to be consummated – so much so that I think it’s fair to operate using a base assumption that the deal is dead, even if that position is not yet official.

A key tenant in industrial organization theory is that it takes three strong competitors to make an efficient market. Without three competitors, industries and companies fall prey to problems of tacit collusion, resulting in slowly higher prices and less overall economic efficiency.

The HAL/BHI merger was done in by the lack of a third strong competitor. While Halliburton showed a willingness to do whatever it took to get the deal done by agreeing to divest billions of dollars of assets, in the end it was not enough. The problem with the deal was the same problem that drove the need for the merger in the first place; low oil prices. Related: How The Oil Crisis Has Impacted Military Spending

Halliburton and Baker Hughes agreed to the merger on the basis of the need to become more efficient to cope with the new lower oil price environment. That same constraint made very few firms willing to step up and invest the capital necessary to buy the assets Halliburton was selling at any kind of a reasonable price. For the vast majority of OFS firms out there right now, this is a time for caution, not aggressive behavior.

That reality became abundantly clear when Weatherford, a prime candidate to become the third strong competitor after the Halliburton-Baker Hughes merger, was forced by its shareholders to drop out of bidding for new assets from Halliburton’s divestiture pool. At the end of the day, only GE showed much of a willingness to bid on many of the assets. This in turn led to weak offer prices to Halliburton and led government regulators to question the feasibility of creating a new third competitor.

So what comes next for Baker Hughes and Halliburton? In the short-term, both companies will face pressure, but that pressure will be particularly acute for Halliburton, which now owes Baker Hughes a hefty $3.5B break-up fee – certainly a very nice consolation prize for the Baker Hughes and its shareholders. One might suspect that Baker Hughes negotiated that rich breakup fee because it was somewhat skeptical of the deal coming to fruition in the first place. Such fears have been proven sage. Related: Crude Charging Higher Ahead Of Big Week

Baker Hughes’ newly refilled coffers should give the company ammo to buy back a significant portion of its own stock or pay out a special dividend, all without compromising its own balance sheet integrity. That’s a big boon for the company’s shareholders.

All of this assumes that Bakers Hughes gets its break-up fee within a reasonable time frame. Given the financial pressures on Halliburton though, it would not be shocking if it tried to take some sort of legal measure to forestall the payment of that fee. Again $3.5 billion is a big number.

Investors in Baker Hughes and Halliburton over the medium-term should do reasonably well. The firms are still part of the triumvirate of premier OFS firms (along with Schlumberger), and while the outlook for oil prices remains bleak now, history suggests these things can shift quickly. After all, in 2013, very few people were talking about oil prices being headed for collapse. Related: BP Shareholders Revolt Over CEO’s Salary

None of that means that Halliburton and Baker Hughes shares won’t come under pressure – they probably will. But it does mean that shareholders should not reflexively panic. With this deal off the table and both Halliburton and Baker Hughes having new capacity for smaller deals and perhaps an appetite for the same thing, mid-sized OFS firms may become interesting acquisition targets.

For instance, Weatherford International and Franks International might both be attractive takeover targets for either Baker Hughes or Halliburton. Finally, it is possible that either Halliburton or Baker Hughes could find themselves the subject of interest from a larger non-competitor that seems to have an interest in entering the space; GE. Only time will tell of course

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News