• 4 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 7 minutes Did Trump start the oil price war?
  • 11 minutes Covid-19 logarithmic growth
  • 15 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 18 minutes China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 9 mins KSA taking Missiles from ?
  • 1 min How to Create a Pandemic
  • 6 hours There are 4 major mfg of hydroxychloroquine in the world. China, Germany, India and Israel. Germany and India are hoarding production and blocked exports to the United States. China not shipping any , don't know their policy.
  • 5 mins A New Solar-Panel Plant Could Have Capacity to Meet Half of Global Demand
  • 4 hours Trump eyes massive expulsion of suspected Chinese spies
  • 13 hours >>The falling of the Persian Gulf oil empires is near <<
  • 10 hours Where's the storage?
  • 6 hours TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
  • 3 hours Today 127 new cases in US, 99 in China, 778 in Italy
  • 6 hours Western Canadian Select selling for $6.48 bbl. Enbridge charges between $7 to $9 bbl to ship to the GOM refineries.
  • 5 hours America’s Corona Tsar, Andrew Fauci, Concedes Covid-19 May Be Just a Bad Flu With a Fatality Rate of 0.1%
  • 11 hours Oxford Epidemiologist: Here’s Why That Covid-19 Doomsday Model Is Likely Way Off
Alt Text

The Oil Glut Is About To Get Even Worse

With OPEC+ countries flooding the…

Alt Text

Russia Will Ignore Oil Markets In G-20 Video Summit

According to a Kremlin spokesman,…

Alt Text

The Biggest Threat To Western Oil Majors

In the modern era, western…

Cyril Widdershoven

Cyril Widdershoven

Dr. Cyril Widdershoven is a long-time observer of the global energy market. Presently, he holds several advisory positions with international think tanks in the Middle…

More Info

Premium Content

The $47 Trillion Death Sentence For Oil & Gas

The future of hydrocarbons is becoming bleak if plans presented by international banks, representing around $47 trillion in value, will be fully implemented.

Around 130 international banks, all present at the UN climate change summit in New York, have committed themselves to decrease their support and investments in the oil and gas sector the coming years. The banking groups have signed the so-called Principles for Responsible Banking, which entails a promise by financial institutions to fully support the implementation of the Paris Agreement, by decreasing hydrocarbon investments while promoting renewables. This statement is going to be a major earthquake for oil and gas companies, threatening upstream and downstream operations worldwide, forcing oil & gas producers to either reduce their impact on the environment or to seek new sources of investment. It is already becoming more difficult for oil and gas companies to find new financing, and on top of this, a large group of institutional investors, representing a value of $11 trillion, are already actively divesting their oil and gas assets.

International banks, such as Deutsche Bank, ABNAmro, Citigroup, Barclays, and ING, are joining the framework. Under the title of action against global warming, the largest financial institutions now seem to be headbutting oil and gas operators. The impact of activist shareholders and NGOs is sending shockwaves through the sector. If the framework is successfully implemented, the hydrocarbon sector shouldn’t fear unrest in the Middle East, but rather their current financiers.

The first sector to take a hit are most likely coal miners, but other sectors are expected to follow. Still, no indicators are showing that the respective banks are actively seeking to ditch their stakes in the hydrocarbon sectors. If this were to materialize, it would fully undermine the future of oil and gas. Related: Are Oil Traders Already Looking Beyond The Saudi Oil Crisis?

The UN commitment by the banks could also backfire. Removing financial support to the hydrocarbon sectors worldwide will put supply under severe pressure. Continuous (re-) financing is needed by oil and gas companies not only to keep current production volumes at the same level but also to increase production to meet global demand growth. Until now, renewable energy output, even if it is showing exponential growth figures, is not at all able even meet yearly demand growth worldwide. Conventional energy sources including coal and nuclear, are still needed to supply the ever-growing need for energy. Economic growth outside of the OECD regions is the real reason for this soaring demand, and the ongoing renewables drive in the West is not having an effect on this at all.

A quick transition to renewable energy is unlikely in non-OECD countries, as oil, gas and coal, will remain the main sources of energy in the next couple of decades. Removing financial support for hydrocarbon companies will put a major bomb under the future of emerging economies. At this moment, hydrocarbons are the main source of energy in most countries around the globe. To prevent a collapse of the global economy, steady financing will be needed, even more than before. Some figures are even showing that in the coming years, more than $11 trillion in energy investment is needed. Related: Is Aramco Lying About Its Damaged Oil Infrastructure?

Without even looking at the Paris Climate Agreement, the current pressure building up on hydrocarbons, and the unilateral decision by banks shown now at the UN, also threatens OECD countries. Energy consumers are not only going to reap the rewards of the energy transition, but will also feel the negative financial aspects of a possible hydrocarbon sector meltdown. For most people, pensions are a thing of the future, but when looking at banks and institutions, people should understand that the ongoing destruction of oil and gas value is not only resulting in stranded assets but could also harm their own pension fund. Oil and gas has been a major cornerstone of most pension funds, as the sector has, for decades, yielded healthy returns. Divesting from fossil fuels could result in a situation that causes more negative effects than many currently anticipate. Activism is threatening value destruction for all, not only the environment.

Lastly, global security is another issue, as indicated by reports of the IEA and others. Destabilization in oil producing countries could occur as soon as oil revenues start falling. For the West, the main negative outcome would be if conventional energy producers, squeezed by big banks, will look at non-Western parties to become involved. To have an overwhelming majority of future energy supply being paid and owned by non-OECD countries, such as China, Russia or SWFs is not a great outlook at all.

By Cyril Widdershoven for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage






Leave a comment
  • Lee James on September 24 2019 said:
    Yes, don't forget about the national security implications of future oil supply. Non-OECD countries are not afraid to pollute. We must also remember what a lot of oil-producing countries do with their oil revenue: weapons.

    If investors pull back from fossil fuel development, I would expect the cost of fossil fuel to go up for those burning these fuels. Consumers should pay the real cost of these fuels, not a subsidized cost or a cost kept lower by overly optimistic fossil-fuel investors who confuse oil production volume for oil profit.
  • Jeffrey Pickett on September 24 2019 said:
    Deutsche Bank? The derivative domino failure chain reaction is the hope of the pope and the UN. Delusional thought has taken the place of critical thought in the unsustainable Obama takeover student loan debt of college indoctrination plan. Good news for EXXON, BP Mobile, et al, as the independents sell off continues. This will bring some stability to the WTI market. Ask those tenured professors living in their campus utopian book writing kingdom about their Unfunded Liabilities aka retirement. Oh no, standing outside the overrun ER's behind Jose and his 10 family members will give them time to contemplate what went wrong. Are people really this blind? Yes.
  • John Di Laccii on September 26 2019 said:
    Great news, future belongs to LNG and renewables. Ouch, I realy feel sorry for all those Saudis supporting radical movements, Wahabbi events, Muzlim Brotherhood, roasted lamb and Basmati rice, Dashi martyrs, verses and jinis, virgins and swords, beloved Sultan in Ankara and money for nothing.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News