• 12 hours Oil Pares Gains After API Reports Surprise Crude Inventory Build
  • 13 hours Elon Musk Won’t Get Paid Unless Tesla Does “Extraordinarily Well”
  • 13 hours U.S. Regulators Keep Keystone Capacity Capped At 80 Percent
  • 14 hours Trump Signs Off On 30 Percent Tariff On Imported Solar Equipment
  • 16 hours Russian Funds May Invest In Aramco’s IPO To Boost Oil Ties
  • 17 hours IMF Raises Saudi Arabia Growth Outlook On Higher Oil Prices
  • 18 hours China Is World’s Number-2 In LNG Imports
  • 1 day EIA Weekly Inventory Data Due Wednesday, Despite Govt. Shutdown
  • 1 day Oklahoma Rig Explodes, Leaving Five Missing
  • 1 day Lloyd’s Sees No Room For Coal In New Investment Strategy
  • 2 days Gunmen Kidnap Nigerian Oil Workers In Oil-Rich Delta Area
  • 2 days Libya’s NOC Restarts Oil Fields
  • 2 days US Orion To Develop Gas Field In Iraq
  • 4 days U.S. On Track To Unseat Saudi Arabia As No.2 Oil Producer In the World
  • 4 days Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 4 days Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 4 days Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 5 days Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 5 days TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 5 days Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 5 days Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 5 days Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 5 days Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 5 days Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 6 days OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 6 days Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 6 days Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 6 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 6 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 6 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 7 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 7 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 7 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 7 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 7 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 7 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 7 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 7 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 7 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 8 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
Alt Text

T. Boone Pickens Shuts Down Oil Hedge Fund

Oilman and investment manager T.…

Alt Text

Iraq Is Troubling The Oil Majors

Oil majors are divided on…

Leonard Hyman & William Tilles

Leonard Hyman & William Tilles

Leonard S. Hyman is an economist and financial analyst specializing in the energy sector. He headed utility equity research at a major brokerage house and…

More Info

South Carolina Governor Looks To Sell State Utility

Utility Poles

In one particularly harrowing scene in the movie the Shawshank Redemption, Tim Robbins asks the brutish prison guard whether he trusts his wife. A question that nearly costs him his life.

In a similar if less dramatic fashion, we ask our readers, “Do you trust your local government (state and county)?” Because in a municipally run electric utility system, that’s who’s in charge. Although ultimately (and technically) the elected officials running the utility answer to voters.

Following the recent cancellation of the V.C. Summer nuclear station in Jenkinsville, South Carolina this July, a joint venture between privately owned SCANA Corp. and state-owned Santee Cooper, the governor has publicly called for the sale of Santee Cooper. At least four neighboring utilities and one in-state corporation are among those believed to be interested.

In a way, Governor McMaster is implicitly saying he no longer trusts the state’s own electric utility managers and is contemplating selling the entire utility as a means of replacing them. Related: Saudi Arabia’s Big Oil Gamble

We certainly understand the political impulse to lash out. There are at least 4.7 billion (each dollar Santee invested in the cancelled nuke to date) good reasons for doing so. And what fuels this public anger is that the state’s PUC and Santee Cooper’s Board will have to address their previous commitments to pay for the now abandoned facility that will never generate so much as a kilowatt of electricity.

Fortunately, the utility now believes that despite the cancellation and due to significantly revised load growth forecasts, they have adequate generating resources.

But threatening to “sell off” Santee Cooper to a privately held utility corporation, like frequently mentioned NextEra or neighboring Duke Power, would mean a rather profound change for Santee’s two million customers throughout South Carolina.

There are several differences between the public and private utilities in the U.S. but the first and most important goes back to trust and ownership. There are two primary forms of utility corporate ownership: for-profit corporations like our investor-owned utilities (IOUs), and not-for-profits like our munis, co-ops and state-owned Santee Cooper, which sells power to 20 co-ops in the state as well as directly to its own customers.

You can find Leonard Hyman's lastest book ‘Electricity Acts’ on Amazon

The main difference between the two is who owns the assets of the business. In the case of the IOUs, assets are owned by the shareholders of the utility.

Or the utility’s assets can be owned by the state or county as with the public entities previously cited. Once that decision—who should own the utility and its assets—is made, the rest pretty much falls into place.

Since Governor McMaster has spoken of selling state-owned Santee Cooper to a privately-owned entity, let’s see what that change implies financially.

First and foremost, it means higher prices for consumers, at least in the long term. Municipal utilities have three substantial cost advantages over their investor-owned brethren: 1.) they are income tax exempt, 2.) they enjoy relatively low-cost financing via the municipal bond markets and, particularly in the Northwest, 3.) have preferential access to low-cost hydropower.

The fourth major difference, although not directly a monetary one, is that munis and similar state-owned entities are not regulated by the state’s public utility commission.

Let’s take a step back and acknowledge something: This is not a level playing field, so to speak. Related: Oil Prices Rise After Strong Crude Inventory Draw

By being mostly tax exempt and enjoying very low borrowing costs, munis and the like have a tremendous cost advantage over the IOUs. And this was the point. From their inception in the 1930s, President Roosevelt acknowledged that the federal government was “putting its thumb on the scale” to help these fledgling entities survive against far better capitalized IOUs like Southern Company or Duke Power.

You can find Leonard Hyman's lastest book ‘Electricity Acts’ on Amazon

In proposing a sale of Santee Cooper, Governor McMaster is effectively telling Roosevelt’s ghost to get lost. The people of South Carolina no longer need the benefits of inexpensively priced electricity. It seems a rather unusual position for a politician in a state seeking more industries where low-priced electricity, in addition to non-union labor, is key.

Both houses of the South Carolina General Assembly would need to approve any sale of Santee Cooper. The legislators willing to speak for attribution sounded cautious about the governor’s plans. We think that’s putting it mildly.

By Leonard Hyman and Bill Tilles

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Douglas Houck on December 22 2017 said:
    Most interesting.

    Here we have identical dual nuclear power plants whose costs have gone from $9 to $19 billion with the completion date extended six years, whose design/construction company is bankrupt. The South Carolina public utility (Santee Cooper) whose primary concern is to it's rate payers decides to end construction to best preserve electric rates and that the electric power is not even needed. The Georgia private utility (Southern Power) whose main interest is to it's investors decides to carry on with the nuclear power units, and asks and receives an additional $3.8 billion in federal loan guarantees, bringing the total to $12 billion. It's stated reason is they believe the cost of natural gas will go up significantly over the next 60 years making nuclear cost competitive in the long term.

    Hmmm, which is a better decision? Seems it depends on whether you are a rate payer or an investor, and how much natural gas you belief the US has.
  • BTilles on December 22 2017 said:
    Yup.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News