• 2 days Nuclear Bomb = Nuclear War: Saudi Arabia Will Develop Nuclear Bomb If Iran Does
  • 1 day Statoil Changes Name
  • 2 days Tillerson just sacked ... how will market react?
  • 23 hours Russian hackers targeted American energy grid
  • 19 hours Is $71 As Good As It Gets For Oil Bulls This Year?
  • 2 days Petrobras Narrows 2017 Loss, Net Debt Falls Below $85bn
  • 2 days Proton battery-alternative for lithium?
  • 2 days Ford Recalls 1.38 Million Vehicles (North America) For Loose Steering Wheel Bolt
  • 19 hours Oil Boom Will Help Ghana To Be One Of The Fastest Growing¨Economies By 2018!
  • 23 hours Country With Biggest Oil Reserves Biggest Threat to World Economy
  • 2 days I vote for Exxon
  • 20 hours HAPPY RIG COUNT DAY!!
  • 2 days UK vs. Russia - Britain Expels 23 Russian Diplomats Over Chemical Attack On Ex-Spy.
  • 2 days Why is gold soooo boring?
  • 2 days South Korea Would Suspend Five Coal - Fire Power Plants.
  • 20 hours Spotify to file $1 billion IPO
Alt Text

Alberta Ready To Fight For Trans Mountain Oil Pipeline

The Alberta parliament has voted…

Alt Text

Equity Markets Surge Despite Tillerson Exit

Markets are enjoying a less-threatening…

Alt Text

The Truth About U.S. Energy Dominance

Recent headlines suggest that the…

Global Risk Insights

Global Risk Insights

GlobalRiskInsights.com provides the web’s best political risk analysis for businesses and investors. Our contributors are some of the brightest minds in economics, politics, finance, and…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Russia Under Threat From U.S. Natural Gas

Russia Under Threat From U.S. Natural Gas

The world focused its attention recently on Cheniere and the United States’ first liquid natural gas export. But the more telling story actually lies behind the scenes and stems from the state-controlled Russian corporation Gazprom.

Over the course of the past six months, the company has begun to experiment with what it deems to be a new pricing strategy driven by conventional market forces, in which the company auctions off natural gas in a competitive marketplace. Gazprom is effectively deviating from their standard pricing convention, whereby the commodity’s price is indexed or linked to oil via a long-term contract. While it is true that this week’s announcement focuses only on a small sub-sector of the company’s clientele — the Baltic States of Lithuania and Latvia — the geopolitical implications are profound.

Impact of the shale boom

Across commodities, the influence of the shale boom has been felt from Riyadh to Moscow, and things aren’t changing any time soon. The United States’ shale boom, coupled with the output of other countries such as Australia, has afforded the United States and other countries the opportunity to now source their natural gas from a more competitive marketplace. Related: Seeing Beyond Sentiment In Oil’s Latest Rally 

As a result of this increasingly competitive landscape, global prices have converged, as a consumer’s location is no longer as important in dictating the price they receive as it once was.

Ultimately, the influx of producers from the United States and Australia has suppressed the arbitrage opportunities that previously existed based on geography. Countries in the Asia-Pacific region and proximate to Russia are paying a premium.

(Click to enlarge)

The tightening of global prices over the past year and a projection through December 2018. Source: Timera Energy

Outside of the overall price convergence, the latest moves by Gazprom are one of the first signs that the geopolitical implications of gas production increases are coming to fruition. In a competitive market, simple economics suggest that given the precipitous drop in oil prices and their linkage to natural gas, any rational producer would look for ways to support revenue levels, including price changes. But the Eastern European natural gas market is quite far from competitive, and it is no secret that the Russian government has historically been able to leverage their position as a key, if not the only, supplier of natural gas to these countries to maintain or demand a high price. Related: Have Oil Markets Grown Numb To Supply Disruptions?

The recent news highlighting the change in pricing structure, despite being labeled as business as usual by company leadership, suggests that the Russian enterprise is looking for alternative ways to claw back market share. It can no longer strong-arm its consumers into an inequitable deal. Outside of the U.S., many other countries and their respective corporations, such as Norway’s Statoil, are beginning to infringe upon what had always been Russian dominated markets as well.

In a world mired in geopolitical conflicts, European leaders have been looking for ways to reduce their dependency on Russian gas. Consequently, the auctions suggest that the pressure is finally being felt in Moscow.

Another factor in Gazprom’s new strategy is the EU’s pending antitrust concerns where the EU is effectively claiming price gouging against the company. In shifting to a blended pricing strategy of long term contracts indexed to oil and a market-based auction, the company is employing a win-win strategy that not only appeases the EU but also backs the strategic effort to regain lost market share and respective geopolitical influence.

What’s next for Gazprom and Russia?

As the rise of new and enhanced production capabilities in the natural gas market continues, energy-producing countries such as Russia and state-owned enterprises such as Gazprom need to adapt a more strategic focus. Marketplace actions, which suggest these countries and their corporations are revisiting their strategies, are a testament to the impact of the global supply increase. They also speak to the potential efficacy of these industries and their players as a foreign policy tool. Related: What Happens When Oil Hits $50?

Furthermore, simply because Russia is opening itself up to a more market-oriented style of pricing doesn’t mean that the geopolitical influence it has over Europe with regard to natural resources is going away any time soon. However, it does mean that the state-owned companies such as Gazprom have begun to feel the pressure. They may continue to act in ways consistent with preserving the status quo and maintaining market share.

Studies suggest that Russia, as a low cost producer, may act in a fashion similar to OPEC and apply pressure to other market participants by using price to its advantage. This is an indeterminate path at best.

The impact of increases in commodities production capacity and output across the world has forced the hands of the leading market players, and natural gas is no different. In regions of historic contention, this supply impact is beginning to reshape the relevant power dynamics that govern energy resources. It may ultimately serve to change regional geopolitical alliances as well.

By Eric Simmons via Globalrisksinsights.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News