• 3 minutes TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
  • 5 minutes Covid-19 logarithmic growth
  • 8 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 12 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 14 minutes China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 50 mins How to Create a Pandemic
  • 45 mins Which producers will shut in first?
  • 2 hours KSA taking Missiles from ?
  • 2 hours There are 4 major mfg of hydroxychloroquine in the world. China, Germany, India and Israel. Germany and India are hoarding production and blocked exports to the United States. China not shipping any , don't know their policy.
  • 2 hours A New Solar-Panel Plant Could Have Capacity to Meet Half of Global Demand
  • 1 hour Trump eyes massive expulsion of suspected Chinese spies
  • 2 hours Breaking News - Strategic Strikes on Chinese Troll Farms
  • 5 mins WE have a suicidal player in the energy industry
  • 24 mins Eight Billion Dollars Wasted on Nuclear Storage Plant
  • 16 hours Today 127 new cases in US, 99 in China, 778 in Italy
  • 17 hours America’s Corona Tsar, Andrew Fauci, Concedes Covid-19 May Be Just a Bad Flu With a Fatality Rate of 0.1%
Alt Text

The Cheapest Way For Trump To Save U.S. Oil

U.S. President Trump is under…

Alt Text

Natural Gas Prices Could Double Next Year

Shale gas production could start…

Anes Alic

Anes Alic

Anes Alic is a veteran investigative journalist and writer whose work in everything from anti-terrorism and high-level politics, to industry, investing and IT has won…

More Info

Premium Content

Real Energy Independence Is An Illusion

Ultimately, energy independence is an illusion in the era of globalization because the hyper connectedness of the market makes it impossible. Still, it’s a never-ending battle cry that ends up being an argument of semantics, the outcome of which depends on how you define “independence”.   

America's ongoing oil and shale boom has reignited the debate about something that the nation had long come to consider a far-off dream: energy independence. 

The notion that the country could become self-sufficient by producing enough energy to sustain the entirety of its population and industries was first floated by Nixon when he declared war on foreign oil during the oil crisis of the 1970s. 

It was later popularized by Bush in a state of the union address in February 2006 when he decried United States’ addiction to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world before announcing plans to break this addiction by developing several alternatives, including a multibillion-dollar subsidized ramp-up of biofuels. 

Bush went on to boldly declare that by 2025, America would “...make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past” by cutting imports from Gulf states by three-quarters.

Well, it turns out the former president was prescient on some key predictions, which in hindsight appears quite remarkable when you consider that back then, the shale industry was barely on its feet. The shale era now is in full swing, with Trump, uncharacteristically, preferring to describe it using the somewhat less boisterous moniker of a “new era of American energy dominance”.

But the devil is in the details in any discussion as to whether America is any closer to true energy independence than during Nixon’s time or whether it is a populist charade masquerading as an energy strategy. There’s a third option, too: It’s simply misunderstood. 

Net Oil Exporter

For many years, the United States has been the leader in the $6 trillion global energy market, and is currently the world’s largest oil producer accounting for about 18 percent of global oil supply. But it has also been a leading importer of energy with foreign markets supplying about 20 percent of its needs.

However, the country recently achieved a key tenet of energy independence: becoming a net exporter of petroleum - which includes crude oil and petroleum products. In 2019, the US became a net petroleum exporting nation for the first time in 75 years with the latest data by U.S. Department of Energy (November 2019) showing that the country exported around 750,000 b/d more than it imported - the third consecutive month it did so.

But this ‘net exporter’ tag comes with an asterisk: US crude oil imports, specifically, averaged 5.8 million b/d in November vs. 3.0 million b/d for exports with the US Gulf Coast being the only region that exports more crude oil than it imports.

Indeed, US crude imports have remained stubbornly high even during the shale boom thanks to healthy domestic demand. US crude oil production has shot up 160 percent to over 13 million b/d since the advent of the shale era; meanwhile, domestic demand has remained flat but very high at 19-21 million b/d.  Related: Oil Recovers From Last Night’s Nosedive

In 2019, the country still imported 9.1 million b/d of petroleum and other liquids, with 6.8 million b/d of those being crude oil, due to constraints such as regional supply/demand imbalances, infrastructural challenges and other factors. Further, many of the refineries in the United States optimized to process the heavier crude grades from Canada, Venezuela, and Mexico instead of the lighter, sweeter oil crude from its own shale fields. 

Source: EIA

The main consolation here is that a bigger proportion of its oil imports have been coming from its northern ally with crude imports from Canada clocking in at 134 million barrels in 2019 from 76 million in 2008. As Bush predicted, the United States is no longer as heavily reliant on OPEC for its oil, with the cartel supplying less than 30 percent of imports.

Sensitivity To World Oil Price Swings

True energy independence, however, goes beyond the mere supply-demand equation.

True energy independence means that the United States not only supplies all its oil needs but also that its oil markets are inured from disruptions by events in foreign markets. In other words, the Department of Defense and the American consumer should no longer be at the mercy of global energy price swings.

The reality here, however, is very different. This often hits home when major supply/demand shocks, such as the Saudi drone attacks, occur. 

Although one could certainly argue that the shale boom has watered down OPEC’s influence, offering a level of insulation against price shocks when OPEC restricts output, the United States has hardly separated itself from the world’s energy stage.

Oil prices spiked 20 percent in the aftermath of the attacks and remained 10 percent higher for weeks despite Saudi Arabia having enough reserves to last several weeks and quickly restoring production. As the Times noted, had this attack happened a decade ago, oil prices would probably have spiked way higher and rocked the global economy. Still, it was a stark reminder that energy sources like oil, coal and natural gas just cannot hide from global fluctuations.  Related: A Third Of Fossil Fuel Assets May Soon Be Stranded

The basic problem here is fungibility. Whereas there are no shortages of barriers to free trade across the globe ranging from tariffs and legal sanctions to the more practical problems of price and infrastructure, consumers of fossil fuels are generally able to access them from producers from all over the globe. The US produces 18 percent of the world’s oil and as such, it has some clout to sway global markets, but it is only one moving part that affects the remaining 82 percent of the world’s oil supply.

The only way to be truly independent of these risks is by not using these energy sources at all - by going green.

Renewable energy sources such as solar have their limitations, too, since they require special elements and metals such as gallium, indium, tellurium, neodymium, europium, yttrium, terbium and dysprosium that frequently have to be imported or mined domestically at great environmental costs. But unlike fossil fuels, these elements are not the energy source itself but rather part of the tech that makes them possible and can therefore be substituted and replaced through innovation.

In the final analysis, all this talk of “energy independence" and " energy dominance" is all about becoming the masters of our own fate. This is something that we clearly cannot achieve when still relying on fossil fuels for the bulk of our energy, and going entirely green is the closest we will ever get to true energy independence.

By Anes Alic for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage






Leave a comment
  • Lee James on February 16 2020 said:
    I agree with the article's assessment.

    Our country needs a real energy plan; not a chest-thumping one. So many reasons to reduce energy consumption and produce clean energy locally. So little time.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on February 16 2020 said:
    The United States will never become energy independent or a net oil exporter or the world’s largest crude oil producer. I will explain why.

    In 2019 the United States consumed 21 million barrels a day (mbd) and produced 12.2 mbd as claimed by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) leading to net crude oil imports of 8.8 mbd. It makes not a jot of difference if 2.691 mbd came from Canada or from the moon.

    In 2020 the United States is projected to need to import 11.49 mbd of crude oil to cover its needs based on a projected consumption of 21.49 mbd and a production of 10 mbd.

    Moreover, the claim that the United States is the world’s largest crude oil producer is an illusion and also self-delusion.

    US oil production is overstated by a minimum of 4.349 mbd because it includes natural gas liquids (NGLs) which come from natural gas wells as well as such gases as ethane, propane, butane and pentanes which may not qualify as crude oil and condensates in its crude oil count. These liquids are not oil and can’t be sold as oil on the world market. In fact, major oil exchanges accept neither natural gas plant liquids nor lease condensates as satisfactory delivery for crude oil. And if major exchanges don’t accept NGLs as crude, then they are not crude.

    Deducting 4.349 mbd of NGLs from US claimed oil production of 12.2 mbd gives a figure of 7.851 mbd, a far cry from the 12.2 mbd claimed by the EIA for 2019.

    By 2020 US primary energy consumption and production are projected to reach 2338.6 and 2213.1 million tonnes oil equivalent (mtoe) respectively creating a deficit of 125.5 mtoe. Exports of 217.8 mtoe of natural gas and 47.1 mtoe of coal will be more than offset by imports of 572.15 mtoe of crude oil leaving a net balance of 432.75 mtoes (equivalent to 8.69 mbd) to be imported.

    By 2030, US primary energy consumption and production are projected to reach 2720.2 and 1812.9 mtoe respectively creating a deficit of 907.3 mtoe. Exports of 100.0 mtoe of natural gas (reflecting an almost total depletion of shale gas production) and 24.7 mtoe of coal are overwhelmingly offset by huge imports of 1440.27 mtoe (28.92 mbd of oil) resulting from a virtual depletion of shale oil production.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News