• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 5 hours DUMB IT DOWN-IMPEACHMENT
  • 8 hours Greta named Time Magazine "Person of the Year"
  • 3 hours Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 2 hours POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 2 hours Tories on course to win majority
  • 14 hours Forget The Hype, Aramco Shares May be Valued At Zero Next Year
  • 2 hours Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
  • 13 hours americavchina.com
  • 33 mins WTO is effectively neutered. Trump *already* won the trade war against China and WTO is helpless to intervene
  • 24 hours Can Renewable Natural Gas Compete With Diesel?
  • 14 hours Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO

Nicaragua, the Canal to Rival Panama?

Bottom line: Is the Nicaragua canal even feasible? Not in the timeframe and budget set forth by HK Nicaragua Canal Development Investment Co. Ltd. (HKND). If the project happens, much of the financing is likely to come from the Chinese government, which may consider the project a worthy strategic goal of planting a ‘flag’ in Latin America and helping facilitate global trade on their own terms.

On 13 June, the ruling Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) pushed through a vote in Nicaragua’s National Congress on the “great inter-oceanic canal law” (Law 840). As set forth in that bill, HKND has the sole rights to build an inter-oceanic canal deeper and wider than the Panama Canal and operate it for 50 years, with the possibility to extend the operations contract for another 50 years. The language of the law is extremely favorable to HKND, precluding lawsuits over environmental damages and including plans to build and run a parallel railway (“dry canal”), an oil pipeline, deep-water ports at either end (e.g. Corinto and Monkey Point), at least one major airport, and free-trade zones.

Votes came in entirely along party lines, with every Sandinista congressional representative voting for the bill, except one: Olga Xochilt Ocampo Rocha. On 24 June, Ocampo--who actually refrained from voting either for or against the bill--received a notice from the Supreme Electoral Council (CSE) that she was being removed from office,…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News