• 4 minutes Why Trump will win the wall fight
  • 7 minutes Tension On The Edge: Pakistan Urges U.N. To Intervene Over Kashmir Tension With India
  • 12 minutes Maduro Asks OPEC For Help Against U.S. Sanctions
  • 16 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 5 hours Climate Change: A Summer of Storms and Smog Is Coming
  • 3 hours Itt looks like natural gas may be at its lowest price ever.
  • 6 hours America’s Shale Boom Keeps Rolling Even as Wildcatters Save Cash
  • 18 hours North Korea's Kim To Travel To Vietnam By Train, Summit At Government Guesthouse
  • 19 hours AI Will Eliminate Call Center Jobs
  • 20 hours Oil imports by countries
  • 24 hours NZ Oil, Gas Ban Could Cost $30 Bln
  • 8 hours US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 2 hours Amazon’s Exit Could Scare Off Tech Companies From New York
  • 1 day Solar and Wind Will Not "Save" the Climate
  • 1 day Ayn Rand Was Right
  • 1 day Indian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. OilIndian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. Oil
Alt Text

Saudi Aramco Makes Existential Bet On Oil

Saudi Aramco has doubled down…

Alt Text

How Long Will This Oil Rally Last?

Oil prices have been trading…

Alt Text

Permian Production To Break 4 Million Bpd In March

Permian oil production is set…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Trending Discussions

New Tech Converts CO2 Into Electricity And Hydrogen

Amid increasingly urgent calls for more radical climate change action, a team of South Korean scientists has found a way to kill two birds with one stone by converting carbon dioxide into electricity and hydrogen.

The team, from the Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, took as a starting point of their research the fact that when CO2 is absorbed into the sea—which is where most CO2 emissions end up—the acidity levels of the water rise. As per their report, “If acidity increases, the number of protons increases, which in turn increases the power to attract electrons. If a battery system is created based on this phenomenon, electricity can be produced by removing CO2.”                                        

The system that the researchers invented very much resembles a fuel cell in which the reaction starts when CO2 is injected into the water, which contains the catalyst necessary for the reaction and the sodium metal cathode. The team reports the system has a pretty high conversion efficiency at 50 percent and has operated for more than 1,000 hours without the electrodes sustaining any damage.

Ideally, the system could be deployed to capture and convert emissions from fossil fuel-powered facilities into hydrogen, to be used in its turn as vehicle fuel. However, this is early-stage research. According to the lead co-author of the research, Professor Jeongwon Kim, “This research will lead to more derived research and will be able to produce H2 and electricity more effectively when electrolytes, separator, system design, and electrocatalysts are improved.”

It’s good to have research like that to spur further work in the field and eventually, hopefully, it’ll lead to practically applicable electricity generation systems that at the same time reduce the world’s carbon footprint. However, we will have to wait quite a while longer. Related: "Remorseless’’ Cost Reductions Drive Renewable Energy Revolution

Systems such as the one designed by the UNIST scientists rely on carbon capture and storage. This approach to reducing carbon emissions has been garnering quite a lot of attention but it remains more a topic of discussion than a technology that’s being adopted widely. The reason: prohibitively high costs.

The costliest part is the capture. The Carbon Capture and Storage Association estimates the cost of capturing carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning at about US$70-102 per ton. The same association predicts these could fall to around US$40-57 over the next few years, with hopes that carbon capture technology will follow the cost-falling path of lithium ion batteries. However, it is far from certain it will work out that way.

Back in 2016, a Clean Technica author, business consultant Michael Barnard, calculated the total cost of capturing, transporting, and sequestering (long-term storage) a ton of CO2 at US$120-140. This translates into US$140-164 trillion for the capturing, transportation, and sequestration of more than 1,100 gigatons of CO2 if we are to return to CO2 levels from before the Industrial Revolution, according to Barnard.

It is in this respect that the UNIST breakthrough is very important: it eliminates the need to store the captured CO2 for any considerable length of time. Using it to produce electricity could significantly cut the costs associated with the whole carbon capture and storage affair.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Dan Foster on January 22 2019 said:
    Speaking of killing two birds, have they figured out how many metric tons of carbon are needed to produce enough oxygen for animal, fish and mankind before they start? Seems if you need greater plant life to meet the needs of a larger population ,better fed and healthier planet , you need to know these things.
  • Mitch Farney on January 23 2019 said:
    So... what happens with the carbon atoms? And the oxygen atoms?
  • Judy Cross on January 23 2019 said:
    The great mystery is why the life supporting energy industry keeps paying lip service to the Climate Scam. The people who demonize the life giving substance, CO2 are to be deplored, not catered to. What is going on? Something is very fishy.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News