• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 mins GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 3 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 3 hours The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 23 hours China deletes leaked stats showing plunging birth rate for 2023
  • 6 hours The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
  • 5 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
Chinese EV Stocks Tank on Tariff Drama

Chinese EV Stocks Tank on Tariff Drama

The European Union is expected…

Is It Time to Get Back Into Energy Stocks?

Is It Time to Get Back Into Energy Stocks?

Tech stocks popped this week…

U.S. LNG Shipped to Asia Is Still Cleaner Than Coal

U.S. LNG Shipped to Asia Is Still Cleaner Than Coal

Rystad Energy's research reveals that…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Net-Zero Divide In Oil And Gas Financing Deepens

  • Emission commitments are flexible in the banking and asset-managing world.
  • This week, The Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance issued guidance for investments in oil and gas by its members.
  • Increasingly stricter emission reporting standards; stringent climate risk disclosure requirements; net-zero targets and progress reports will become common practices in international finance.
Citibank

Last year, several U.S. banks threatened to leave the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero – a group led by former Bank of England governor Mark Carney, aimed at facilitating the energy transition.

The reason those banks threatened to leave was that commitments related to the transition process were becoming increasingly aggressive, and they worried that those commitments might end up getting them sued.

Those litigation-nervous banks included three heavyweights of Wall Street: JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America. Later the same year, the world’s top asset manager, Vanguard, joined the skeptic ranks by quitting the Net Zero Asset managers initiative.

The asset manager claimed it wanted to be independent in its decisions and clarify its views on responsible investments for its clients. Meanwhile, Republican state governments were tightening an investigative noose around the neck of the asset management industry to see if they were deliberately avoiding investments in oil and gas and what the effect of the ESG movement was on the investment world.

This may have suggested a certain backlash against the whole emission-reporting, climate commitment disclosure wave of activity that the business world in the West has witnessed recently. In fact, the financial world appears to be deeply divided on all things transition.

This week, yet another net-zero financial institutions’ organization went the opposite way of JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, BofA, and Vanguard. The Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance, whose members manage a combined $11 trillion in assets, issued guidance for investments in oil and gas by its members. That guidance essentially said they shouldn’t do it. Related: Gulf of Mexico Auction Opens As Biden Compromises On Public Land

The guidance focuses on “new upstream infrastructure investments in new oil and gas fields,” and its aim is to advance the alignment of members’ investment strategies and the 1.5-degree scenario of the Paris Agreement. According to the alliance, making sure this scenario plays out is vital.

The guidance is the latest sign that the financial industry is genuinely and deeply concerned about its future returns, but as the developments above suggest, it is not as united as all those alliances might want to make it look.

Sure, every single bank worth its salt has net-zero commitments on paper; some of them might even have them in everyday operations, and for many, these commitments include a promise to stop financing oil and gas projects at some point. For others, it’s a promise that they will no longer invest in new oil and gas developments—but they stick to the ones they are already investing in.

Emission commitments are flexible in the banking and asset-managing world, as evidenced by this study by BloombergNEF. It found that most of the members of the Net Zero Banking Alliance—different from the GFANZ and the Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance—were investing more in oil and gas than renewables despite the respective commitments.

One might argue that the BloombergNEF study was being petty: the Net Zero Banking Alliance members were investing $0.92 in renewables for every dollar they invested in oil and gas. But the fact remains they are still investing in oil and gas. This means the industry is not being strangled anywhere near fast enough.

To accelerate the process, asset managers are issuing these threats of suspending investment. Some, such as HSBC, are directly declaring an end to investments in, for example, coal. With exceptions, of course, because the fossil fuel business still makes pretty good money to just quit cold turkey.

The pressure will continue growing as governments in Europe and the U.S. remain committed to the transition as a top priority. Increasingly stricter emission reporting standards; stringent climate risk disclosure requirements; net-zero targets and progress reports.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is what oil and gas producers—and every business in every industry—will face in the coming years if it wants to draw the gracious attention of these environmentally responsible asset management firms and lenders.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on March 31 2023 said:
    The increasingly monotonous calls for net-zero emissions and higher targets for achieving them are becoming meaningless and disruptive forcing oil companies and other sectors of the global economy either to ignore them altogether or fight back against them.

    In fact, calls by organizations like the Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance and the ESG movement for stricter measures towards net-zero emissions have increasingly far less to do with climate change and far more to do with political agendas.

    The sooner such organizations heed the facts that are staring them in the face the better for the global economy and humanity. These facts are:

    1- The notion of net-zero emissions is an illusion. It will never happen by 2050 or 2100 or ever.

    2- Total global energy transition to renewables is another illusion.

    3- Calls for investors to refrain from investing in oil and gas are illegal and could attract costly litigation cases as is happening in the United States.

    4- Oil and gas will continue to drive the global economy throughout the 21st century and probably far beyond.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News