• 1 hour Turkey Targets $5B Investment In Wind Energy By End-2017
  • 3 hours Weatherford Looks To Sell Assets To Ease Some Of $8B Debt
  • 4 hours OPEC Set To Move Fast On Cut Extension Decision
  • 6 hours Nigeria Makes First Step Away From Oil
  • 18 hours Russia Approves Profit-Based Oil Tax For 2019
  • 22 hours French Strike Disrupts Exxon And Total’s Oil Product Shipments
  • 1 day Kurdistan’s Oil Exports Still Below Pre-Conflict Levels
  • 1 day Oil Production Cuts Taking A Toll On Russia’s Economy
  • 1 day Aramco In Talks With Chinese Petrochemical Producers
  • 1 day Federal Judge Grants Go-Ahead On Keystone XL Lawsuit
  • 1 day Maduro Names Chavez’ Cousin As Citgo Boss
  • 2 days Bidding Action Heats Up In UK’s Continental Shelf
  • 2 days Keystone Pipeline Restart Still Unknown
  • 2 days UK Offers North Sea Oil Producers Tax Relief To Boost Investment
  • 2 days Iraq Wants To Build Gas Pipeline To Kuwait In Blow To Shell
  • 2 days Trader Trafigura Raises Share Of Oil Purchases From State Firms
  • 2 days German Energy Group Uniper Rejects $9B Finnish Takeover Bid
  • 2 days Total Could Lose Big If It Pulls Out Of South Pars Deal
  • 2 days Dakota Watchdog Warns It Could Revoke Keystone XL Approval
  • 3 days Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Major Crude Draw
  • 3 days Citgo President And 5 VPs Arrested On Embezzlement Charges
  • 3 days Gazprom Speaks Out Against OPEC Production Cut Extension
  • 3 days Statoil Looks To Lighter Oil To Boost Profitability
  • 3 days Oil Billionaire Becomes Wind Energy’s Top Influencer
  • 3 days Transneft Warns Urals Oil Quality Reaching Critical Levels
  • 3 days Whitefish Energy Suspends Work In Puerto Rico
  • 3 days U.S. Authorities Arrest Two On Major Energy Corruption Scheme
  • 4 days Thanksgiving Gas Prices At 3-Year High
  • 4 days Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 4 days South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 4 days Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 4 days Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 4 days ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 7 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 7 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 7 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 7 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 7 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 7 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
Alt Text

Oil Tycoon Hamm Slams EIA’s Overoptimistic Shale Forecasts

Shale billionaire and chief executive…

Alt Text

Iran: Most OPEC Producers Back Extension Of Cuts

The majority of OPEC members…

Alt Text

Tesla To Spike, Then Crash

Electric car giant Tesla is…

Bruce Krasting

Bruce Krasting

I worked on Wall Street for twenty five years. I was an FX trader during the early days of the 'snake' and the EMS. Derivatives…

More Info

Large Oil tanker Seized by Somali Pirates – Military Action Not Far Off

Large Oil tanker Seized by Somali Pirates – Military Action Not Far Off

The Somalian pirates seized another big ship the other day. This time it was a large oil tanker. I spoke with a friend who owns ships and lives in Athens about the latest attack. He provided some interesting information. My notes from the conversation:

The seized tanker is owned by a large and successful family owned Greek shipping company. Pirates have hit Greek ships before, but this is the largest ship to be captured. There is $200mm worth of crude on board. The vessel is worth $100mm – 200mm. There was a crew of 25 of which eight were Greeks, most of whom were officers.

The Greek shipping world is PISSED at this one. The combination of the money and the fact that Greek crew members are involved makes this a very big deal.

I got a status on the bigger picture in pirate land:

There are currently 20 ships of all sizes and uses currently being held by Somali pirates. There are approximately 700 prisoners being held. It generally takes two to three months to negotiate and pay a ransom. My guy estimated that in the past year nearly $300mm in ransom has been paid to pirates.

There have been attempts to thwart the pirates but they are (obviously) not working. NATO has warships in the region as does the United States. The problem appears to be the “rules of engagement”. The Western powers have the ability to stop and search suspected pirate ships. But when the pirates see them coming they dump their arms overboard. Therefore they are released as only armed ships and crews can be seized and taken out of commission. The pirates are well aware of these rules.

This part I found very interesting:

The Chinese Navy has a large presence in the region. Rather than just sail around looking for pirates the Chinese are creating large convoys of ships headed for China. The Chinese Navy is escorting these ships through troubled waters. Very few ships destined for China have been attacked as a result. Of interest is that the Chinese are now offering to escort non-Chinese vessels to safe waters (for a large fee).

The problem with the convoy approach is that it is very expensive. Ships have to wait to embark until a large enough convoy has been formed. Time is money in shipping. In addition, there is the very large expense of the Chinese navy ships and their crews. Apparently China Inc. is willing to foot the bill as they don’t want to be in the difficult position of losing a ship and then have to send military forces (or big money) to retrieve it. Korean special Ops did retrieve a seized ship last year, but in the process several crew members were killed and the ship in question suffered significant damage.

Once the pirates seize a ship at sea they have won. The ships/cargos/crew are far too valuable to risk with military operations. It is much “cheaper” to pay a $30mm ransom than to risk a $300mm loss. The owners/lenders/insurers all understand these facts. So do the pirates.

Therefore the only “solution” to the pirate problem is to send in troops. Get boots on the ground, find the pirates and wipe them out. But the question is, "whose boots"? There are only two possibilities.

The US has 60,000 Special Forces that are technically available for combat operations. These troops are battled tested and are a formidable force. They would be more than up to the task of taking on the pirates. But our Special Forces are already overextended after so many years in Iraq and Afghanistan. The ‘excess force’ doctrine requires that if the US commits troops it’s done so in overwhelming numbers. We do not have those “overwhelming” numbers at the moment.

The other alternative is NATO. The Brits, Germans, French all have highly trained forces that would be up to the job. NATO has the large amphibious capability that is required. But the thinking is that NATO does not have as much at stake given the sea routes. And therefore they are unlikely to commit troops either.

It would appear as if the status quo has to continue based on this. But my friend thinks that something must come relatively soon whether the US or NATO likes it or not. His reasoning:

What are the pirates doing with $300mm a year of cash income? Buying better, faster attack boats. They are buying more and more sophisticated military equipment including advanced weapons systems and communications equipment. They are hiring more pirates. With each ship they seize they get stronger. This simply can’t be allowed to happen for much longer is the thinking.

There are two very big wild cards in this story. Either of them could tip the balance and force either NATO the US or combined forces to act in the near future:

The route to Europe for shipping is the Suez Canal. Should things develop in Egypt such that the canal is either closed or perceived to be unsafe then thousands of additional ships will be forced to sail in Somali waters to get to Europe. The pirates would love that. More ships, more opportunity.

The final consideration is what is happening within Somalia. There is a group called al Shaabab. They are Muslim extremists. They too are highly armed. They have been fighting with the Somali pirates. Al- Shaabab wants to take over the job the pirates are doing. They want the money and the power that comes from pirating ships.

The concern is that al Shaabab will succeed. If they do they will be in even more powerful menace than the current pirates. Even worse, they are Muslim. The US and NATO simply cannot put forces against Muslims at this time. That would be very bad global politics.

So there are two time fuses that could force military action. If the Suez is closed or if al Shaabab gets aggressive then force will be required. The thinking from Athens is that either or both of the conditions will be met in the not too distant future. Military action is not far off.

By. Bruce Krasting

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on February 11 2011 said:
    No, this isn't happening. This is some kind of joke, isn't it. I was employed in the engineering department at Great Lakes (USA), during which time I often visited the CIC (combat information center) of destroyer escorts. Ships of that category, with the technology that was available then, and the helicopters that are available now, could make pirating impossible.Of course, if the decision makers have an attack of the stupids, which often happens, then somebody should pass a hat and get that 300 million mentioned in this article.
  • Anonymous on February 12 2011 said:
    The problem here is twofold; 1 is that after 9 years of fighting guerrilas/terrorists/insurgents whatever in Iraq/Afghan, the West is militarily overextended, worn out and bankrupt. Its military esp. the US and UK military are in desperate need of R&R, replacement and maintenance. If they wanted to go into Somalia it would be like Iraq again. Somalia is huge. The West simply doesn't have the resouces to police both land and sea effectively. Nor does it have the political will. Secondly, piracy is the least of the problems. As I mentioned elsewhere, all 'they' need is to carry one or more Kornets (supersonic anti-ship missiles) either into the Indian Ocean or into the Horn of Africa, near Djibouti and they could as easily sink an oil carrier as seize her. think what that would do, esp. in conjunction with problems at Suez... I'm afraid 'they' have the West by the 'short and curlies' for the present.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News