• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 14 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 18 minutes California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 54 mins Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 2 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 8 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
  • 3 mins Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 2 hours Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 6 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 7 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 15 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 6 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 17 hours Merkel, Putin to discuss Syria, Ukraine, Nord Stream 2
  • 14 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 19 hours Saudi Production Cut or Demand Drop?
  • 13 hours Saudi Aramco IPO Seems Unlikely
Alt Text

Is A Supply Crunch In Oil Markets Inevitable?

Several energy agencies and forecasters…

Alt Text

Is Nigeria’s Oil Industry On The Road To Recovery?

Throughout the spring and summer…

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel Graeber is a writer and political analyst based in Michigan. His work on matters related to the geopolitical aspects of the global energy sector,…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Is it Time to Let BP back in the U.S. Oil Game?

Is it Time to Let BP back in the U.S. Oil Game?

BP is hard at work in the Gulf of Mexico, launching a third phase to a legacy project off the coast of New Orleans. Outside of the production phase, it's working just as hard to revamp its image. Four years and a $4 billion promise later, is it time to move on?

BP said production started from Phase 3 of the Na Kika project, situated about 140 miles off the coast of New Orleans in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico. With a total production capacity of 130,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, BP's regional President Richard Morisson said Na Kika was a testament to the importance of the region.

"The Na Kika Phase 3 project demonstrates BP’s ongoing commitment to the deepwater Gulf of Mexico and highlights our portfolio's ability to unlock value for investors while also delivering vital energy resources to the United States," he said.

Related Article: Forget Momentum – 2014 is About Value

Production from Na Kika first began in 2003, seven years before the Deepwater Horizon tragedy soiled the region along with BP's reputation. Nearly four years after the incident and the company says it's not only the largest investor in the region, but the leading acreage holder as well.

It can't bid on new acreage, however, because of a 2012 ban imposed by the U.S. federal government after the company pleaded guilty to criminal charges stemming from the disaster. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said BP lacked "integrity," prompting the British oil giant to sue. The Justice Department, however, said BP has yet to show it was a "responsible" potential contractor, and ruled to keep the company out of new bids. BP America CEO John Minge said, however, "we're getting closer" to having that ban reversed.

Two lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico scheduled for March could unlock 1.7 billion new barrels of oil and 4.1 trillion cubic of gas for explorers. The first three leases outlined under the terms of a five-year lease plan brought in $1.4 billion in high bids for the government.

Related Article: Betting on the Next Oil Boom? You're Grasping at Straws

Last week, the company said the environmental damage to the gulf ecosystem might be "far less" than originally feared. It remains, however, the whipping boy for advocates wary of offshore development and still could face $18 billion in penalties for violating the Clean Water Act. Some of the claims already paid out are frivolous, the company said in an anti-scapegoat offensive, and have "no apparent connection to the spill."

BP's dismal fourth quarter earnings showed remnants of the Gulf of Mexico disaster, though its performance was buoyed partially by its stake in Russian operations. Lip service aside, the company said it wants to invest $4 billion a year in oil and gas development in the Gulf of Mexico over the next 10 years. If there's any sincerity to rhetoric behind the North American energy narrative, a strong future may have to include BP.

By Daniel J. Graeber of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • theblamee1 on February 25 2014 said:
    I live here in the Pacific NW where BP has a refinery at Cherry Point (the same refinery that blew up two years ago this month).

    When the disaster in the U.S. Gulf happened 4-years ago, everybody up here could have told you something like that would happen, that a disaster was just waiting to happen, based solely upon BP's complete lack of professionalism, open behavior of thug management practices towards everybody, everywhere.

    You people didn't listen then and the U.S. Gulf was destroyed. And when the U.S. Gulf "accident" happened nobody in the industry paid attention again when the refinery fire at BP Cherry Point happened.

    What has to happen before the industry and governments tell themselves the truth, that BP is no good for anybody? Nobody tells the truth about anything where lies and liars will do what needs to be done and needs to be said so much better than the truth.

    Nothing has changed. The bullies are still in charge. The game of remains the same. And now the industry wants to "kiss and make up."

    Like a domesticated animal turned predator, this company needs to be put down. But you people in "the industry" will not listen.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News