3 daysJapan Nuclear Regulator Greenlights Radiactive Water Release From Fukushima
4 daysChina To Offload 2 Million Barrels of Iranian Crude Despite Sanctions
4 daysEx-German Chancellor Could Be Sanctioned Over Rosneft Ties
4 daysGasoline Prices Top $6 In California, $9 In Parts Of Europe
4 daysOil, Gas Employment Will Take Five Years To Recover From Covid: Rystad
4 daysInsurers Are Suffering Major Losses Due To Climate Change
4 days"Fossil Fuels Are A Dead End," UN Secretary-General Says
4 daysRussia Increasingly Using Own Oil Tankers To Boost Shipments To Asia
4 daysSaudi Oil Revenue To Surge 66% To $249 Billion On High Prices
4 daysRussia Could Halt Gas Supply To Finland On Friday
4 daysRussia's Gas Flows Via Ukraine Plunged 50% In The Past Week
5 daysAPI Reports Inventory Draws In Crude, Gasoline Despite SPR Release
5 daysLibyan Oil Deadlocked As Clashes Force PM-Designate Out of Tripoli
5 daysPutin: Europe Committing “Economic Suicide” With Energy Sanctions
5 daysUnited States To Release Venezuela From Some Oil Sanctions
5 daysU.S. Set To Suggest European Tariff On Russian Oil Instead Of Embargo
5 daysHungary Says Complying With Russia Oil Ban Would Cost It $811 Million
5 daysNew Trading Firms Replace Oil Majors In Business With Russia
5 daysIraqi Government Prevents Chinese Parties From Buying Into Oil Deals
5 daysSaudi Aramco Considers Listing $30 Billion Trading Arm As Oil Prices Soar
5 daysRussia Becomes One Of India’s Top 5 Oil Suppliers
4 minutes"Natural Gas Trading Picks Up Considerably Amid High Volatility" by Charles Kennedy - ...And is U.S. NatGas Futures dramatically overbought at the $6.35 range?
8 minutesHow Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
12 minutes What Russia has reached over three months diplomatic and military pressure on West ?
17 minsGREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
15 hoursWhat China is Learning from Russia's War in Ukraine and its Consequences
4 daysRevisiting: "The U.S. Grid Isn’t Ready For A Major Shift To Renewables" from March 2021 by Irina Slav at OILPRICE
14 hoursNatural Gas is the Cleanest and most Likely Source of Energy to Fuel the World.
7 daysHow cheap Chinese tires might explain Russia's 'stalled' 40-mile-long military convoy in Ukraine
3 daysFailure To Implement Russian Oil Ban Could Send Oil Crashing To $65
1 hourAdvancing Fundamental Drilling Science - Geothermal drilling successes offer potential gain for petroleum industry
47 mins"Russia will stop 'in a moment' if Ukraine meets terms - Kremlin" by Reuters via Yahoo News...but Reuters suddenly cut out the balanced part of the story.
In my last column, I pointed out the lockstep insanity being followed by US oil companies in increasing production, no matter whether or not the end product was profitable in today’s depressed oil market. Happily, I was also seeing an end to that destructive strategy, with several independent E+P’s guiding lower on production and cutting capex yet again.
I won’t replay last week’s column in its entirety. But now that oil is showing real signs of being ready to break out of its 2017 range, what oil companies do now will really matter for our investments. Will they turn open the spigot again at the first sign of recovering prices? Or have they been cowed enough (or just plain out of leveraging options) and will stop trying to forecast oil prices and just let the market dictate their plans?
There are signs that the oil companies will be more conservative if oil does reach $60 or even $70 later this year. This story outlines the plummeting use of sand, a major input cost for frackers. This is important particularly because ever more efficient drilling technologies, which maximize acreage and initial volumes of oil from fracked wells, all rely on ever larger volumes of sand.
The sudden drop in sand orders could mean that oil companies are taking a real break on breakneck drilling. Or, it could mean that they’re just fed up with rising sand costs. Or, it’s possible they are experimenting with other (cheaper?) compounds.
What…
In my last column, I pointed out the lockstep insanity being followed by US oil companies in increasing production, no matter whether or not the end product was profitable in today’s depressed oil market. Happily, I was also seeing an end to that destructive strategy, with several independent E+P’s guiding lower on production and cutting capex yet again.
I won’t replay last week’s column in its entirety. But now that oil is showing real signs of being ready to break out of its 2017 range, what oil companies do now will really matter for our investments. Will they turn open the spigot again at the first sign of recovering prices? Or have they been cowed enough (or just plain out of leveraging options) and will stop trying to forecast oil prices and just let the market dictate their plans?
There are signs that the oil companies will be more conservative if oil does reach $60 or even $70 later this year. This story outlines the plummeting use of sand, a major input cost for frackers. This is important particularly because ever more efficient drilling technologies, which maximize acreage and initial volumes of oil from fracked wells, all rely on ever larger volumes of sand.
The sudden drop in sand orders could mean that oil companies are taking a real break on breakneck drilling. Or, it could mean that they’re just fed up with rising sand costs. Or, it’s possible they are experimenting with other (cheaper?) compounds.
What do I think? For a start, I think that sand frack companies like Emerge (EMES) and US Silica (SLCA) are going to be the wrong place to be for a while.
There are those that do not agree with my outlook on reduced drilling and production. Here’s one Canadian fracking services CEO who believes Permian oil production is on the verge of another big volume boost. He’s seeing the 72% year-over-year rise in ‘drilled but uncompleted wells’ (DUCs) and expecting what the EIA is expecting – a new flood of oil.
Despite the increasing inventory of DUCs, I don’t think that’s how it’ll all work out, even with an oil price boost. I think Permian producers like Pioneer (PXD) and Diamondback (FANG) have seen the light and grown tired of losing money on ever greater volumes of oil.
I have recently finished a free report that I am calling the “Five Things You Don’t Know About Oil – But Need To”, accessible later this month on my website. All five of them play into my long-term thesis of $100+ barrel oil, but the last is about where we are in the timeline of the “US shale oil boom”. One piece I noticed agreeing with my long-standing view of where we are in the cycle was in the Wall Street Journal, and needs to be read closely.
Is shale oil really going to deliver on any of its promises of energy independence? Continuing cheap prices? Long-term domestic supply?
Ultimately, the answers to all of these questions is no. And we need to keep these ultimate disappointments in mind as we carefully choose the right energy companies to invest in. Money can be made, and great money will be made in the next several years – but we will do better understanding that shale is ultimately a limited opportunity. Only the best of the best of US shale producers, those with a deep portfolio of assets and a minimum of leverage will yield great long-term returns. The others will do nothing but lose money.
Continue to look for those few US frackers that will be ready to benefit fully from a rebounding oil price – those like EOG Resources (EOG) and Cimarex (XEC), and you will be rewarded. Many of the others will continue their share price retreat, even if oil prices rebound sharply.
To access this exclusive content...
Select your membership level below
COMMUNITY MEMBERSHIP
(FREE)
Full access to the largest energy community on the web