• 4 minutes WTI Heading for $60
  • 6 minutes OPEC Builds Case For Oil Supply Cut
  • 15 minutes Major News---Bigger Picture
  • 12 hours Starbucks slashing its corporate workforce
  • 3 hours Your idea of oil/gas prices next ten years
  • 6 hours Plastic Myth-Busters
  • 2 mins Good Sign for US Farmers: Soybean Prices Signals US-China Trade Deal Progress
  • 5 hours Could EVs Become Cheaper than ICE Cars by 2023?
  • 14 hours Here We Go Again: EU Will Hit Back If U.S. Imposes Car Tariffs
  • 10 hours what's up with NG?
  • 1 day Solid-State Batteries At Least a Decade Away From Mass Adoption
  • 15 hours Zohr Giant Gas Field Increases Production Six-Fold
  • 17 mins Soybean sale to China down 94%
  • 2 days Big Brother Is Watching You: Chinese ‘Gait Recognition’ Tech IDs People By How They Walk
  • 11 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 10 hours Pros and Cons of Coal

Breaking News:

Crude Build Halts Oil Price Recovery

Alt Text

UAE Announces Major Oil & Gas Discoveries

UAE’s ADNOC has announced a…

Alt Text

Is An Oil Supply Crunch Inevitable?

The IEA’s latest World Energy…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Goldman Sachs: Brent To Hit $80 Before Year-End

Oil prices have fallen around 15 percent over the past month, and concerns about oversupply have rushed back. OPEC and the U.S. are both adding enormous volumes of fresh supply, threatening to create a bear market for crude.

However, the souring market sentiment could perhaps outstrip what is justified. Goldman Sachs argues in a report that the loss of supply from Iran, combined with thin spare capacity and resilient oil demand will push prices back up. The investment bank reiterated its forecast for Brent to hit $80 per barrel by the end of the year.

Part of the reason that oil traders have grown pessimistic on oil is that demand suddenly looks shaky. Specifically, demand in emerging markets appears weak, particularly as currencies have weakened against the dollar, which has magnified the price shock for consumers. However, Goldman Sachs says that when digging into the data, demand doesn’t seem to have changed all that much. “Our modeling and tracking suggest however that these concerns are likely excessive,” Goldman analysts wrote.

There are a few reasons for this, the bank argues. Oil demand is still growing at a brisk rate globally. More specifically, Chinese oil demand “continues to surprise to the upside despite the ongoing activity slowdown,” the bank said. Also, the impact of higher fuel prices in local currencies in emerging markets “will remain moderate in 2018 and have dissipated by mid-2019 at current oil and USD levels, which are our base case forecasts.” Related: Trade War Could Be ‘Pivotal’ For U.S. LNG

Moreover, Goldman Sachs is not buying into the notion of a global economic slowdown, although it admits that this area is a little bit difficult to predict.

The recent narrative in the oil market has focused on the tension between the loss of supply from Iran versus higher OPEC production and weaker demand. The resilience of Iranian oil exports, combined with higher OPEC and U.S. oil production, has led to more pessimism regarding prices. Brent has crashed from around $86 per barrel in early October to the mid-$70s a month later.

However, this price correction might only have let some steam out of the market, recalibrating expectations lower, which could create more room to the upside. Goldman Sachs argues that Iranian oil exports will still decline from here, despite the likely issuance of waivers by the United States to some importers. That means that prices might be hitting a temporary low just ahead of implementation of U.S. sanctions on November 5, opening up upside potential thereafter.

“With October high-frequency oil inventory data pointing to a slowdown in stockbuilds globally and Iran production still set to fall, we believe that the market will end up in a deficit in November, setting the stage for a recovery in both Brent flat prices and timespreads,” Goldman analysts wrote.

The most crucial difference between Goldman and some other forecasters is the confidence in emerging market demand. The bank has emerging market oil demand growing by 1.55 million barrels per day (mb/d) in 2018 and 1.45 mb/d in 2019, which is above consensus forecasts. Goldman argues that data in emerging markets is lacking, and demand figures tend to be retroactively revised higher later on. If his is correct, the oil market might be tighter than most people think. Related: High Oil Prices Are Already Destroying Demand

For instance, inventory data in many countries is often missing, so any slowdown in imports is often interpreted as weak demand, when in fact, an individual country might be simply drawing on inventories. This “destocking” doesn’t show up in the data, and market analysts wrongly think that such a country is trimming imports because demand is slowing. Goldman believes that this is occurring in China, where it thinks demand is much higher than the market believes.

Moreover, emerging markets might even recover in 2019, which could result in only a modest slowdown in the global economy, rather than a deeper downturn that some forecasters are eyeing.

Finally, any downturn in prices would likely be met by a cut in production from OPEC. The group seems to have grown more accustomed to higher prices, and now appears eager to put in place a price floor that is much higher than it was a year or two ago. Rather than the $50 or $60 that OPEC was comfortable with in 2017, the new floor might be somewhere around $70.

Going forward, OPEC will likely calibrate production levels to avoid a sharp decline in prices. “Only a large demand shock would push inventories sharply higher and prices sharply lower as the production cuts could not match the velocity of the demand decline,” Goldman argues.

Add it all up, and rather than the beginning of a deeper downturn, oil prices might be hitting a near-term bottom.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Frank on November 01 2018 said:
    Wonderful to watch Goldman squirm as their Tesla short and long oil positions tank.
  • Mamdouh G Salameh on November 02 2018 said:
    Despite the recent decline in oil prices, I am convinced that the global oil market fundamentals are still robust enough to support an oil price of $80 a barrel in November possibly even hitting $85 before the end of the year.

    Moreover, neither global oil demand nor demand by the emerging economies have shown any evidence of slackening despite claims by the International Energy Agency (IEA) that high oil prices are starting to impact adversely on the global oil demand.

    Furthermore, emerging economies can to a great extent neutralize the impact of higher fuel prices in local currencies by discarding the appreciating US dollar and paying for their oil imports by barter trade and currency exchange agreements or by the petro-yuan. India, Turkey and Iran are already doing exactly that.

    I disagree strongly with Goldman Sachs about the impact of US sanctions on Iran’s oil exports. US sanctions are doomed to fail miserably and Iran will not lose a single barrel of oil from its exports. The claim by President Trump that there is enough oil to offset Iran loss is an admission that his sanctions are doomed to fail. This admission follows in the footsteps of US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s back tracking from zero imports to willingness to issue sanctions waivers to purchasers of Iranian crude provided they reduce their purchases by 20%.

    I also disagree with Goldman Sachs that OPEC and the US are both adding enormous volumes of fresh supply, threatening to create a bear market for crude. How could OPEC be adding enormous amounts of oil to the market when it hardly has a spare capacity to raise its production. Both Saudi Arabia and Russia were not able to add more than the 650,000 barrels a day (b/d) they have both already contributed three weeks ago. As for the US, oil production figures announced by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) are at the best of time questionable.

    The pro-Trump vested interests have been waging a concerted campaign helped by the likes of the EIA and the IEA to depress oil prices in order to save President Trump’s neck in the coming Congressional mid-term elections in the next few days.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News