• 7 minutes Does S Arabia Have 2 Mln Barrels in Spare Capacity?
  • 11 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 19 minutes Venezuela, the largest oil reserve in the world, faces deep shortages of motor oil
  • 17 hours 67.50 was the low for now, $70 - $76+ back in play
  • 17 hours EU And Japan Sign Historic Free Trade Deal
  • 16 hours Where 3 Million Electric Vehicle Batteries Will Go When They Retire?
  • 21 hours Germany: We Can No Longer Fully Rely On U.S. White House
  • 16 hours Daimler and BMW Will Beat Tesla in EV Race
  • 1 day Chartist predicting a $1 fall, after WTI drops $10
  • 16 hours China’s Technology Sector Takes On Silicon Valley
  • 10 hours Chile Becomes The Latest Country To Commit To 100% Renewables
  • 2 days Well from $74 we hit 67.xx now what?
  • 20 hours Trump-Putin Helsinki Summit And Oil Prices
  • 1 day Rio Tinto Says $4-Million Goodbye to Coal
  • 2 days Trade War of 1930s, Extended the Great Depression
  • 2 days Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 17 hours Trump mulling releasing 5 to 30 Mill Barrels
Alt Text

Housing Prices Soar As Oil Boom Escalates

Though the economy is booming,…

Alt Text

Mexico’s New Government Won’t Upend Energy Reforms

Mexico’s new President Lopez Obrador…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Court Decision Could Accelerate Oil And Gas Bankruptcies

Court Decision Could Accelerate Oil And Gas Bankruptcies

Oil and gas data experts Evaluate Energy showed yesterday that U.S. E&Ps took a huge hit in 2015. With the value of total proved reserves in the sector declining by an astounding $515 billion dollars. 

The chart below shows just how great the damage is, compared to reserves valuations the last few years.

Factors like that have caused an increasing number of high-profile E&Ps to file for bankruptcy in America. And a critical court decision this week could mean even more coming. Related: Why Saudi Arabia Has No Intention To End The Oil Glut

That ruling came Tuesday in the bankruptcy proceedings of Sabine Oil & Gas, detailed by Energy Law360. Where a New York judge ruled that bankruptcy allows Sabine to cancel contracts it holds with midstream firms on the company’s petroleum licenses in Texas.

Here’s why this is a sea change for oil and gas law.

Sabine held three separate contracts with pipeline firms in Texas, for the transport and sale of oil and gas that the company produced. These contracts came with clauses like “deliver or pay” features — where Sabine was obligated to send minimum volumes of production through the pipeline, or pay financial penalties to the pipeline operators. Related: Exposing The Oil Glut: Where Are The 550 Million Missing Barrels?!

Such contracts could have been a stumbling block in bankruptcy — requiring the company to deliver production or cash at a time when its operations have slowed or stopped. And so Sabine had challenged in bankruptcy court to have the agreements nixed.

And the judge in the case agreed. Ruling that the midstream contracts are not “running with the land” — in essence, saying that the contracts are not inextricably tied to the land assets that underlie Sabine.

The decision opens the door for Sabine to sever the contracts as it restructures in bankruptcy. A strategy that other E&Ps immediately jumped on — with bankrupt producer Magnum Hunter Resources yesterday striking a deal to cancel four midstream contracts as it restructures. Related: Three Stocks Well Positioned For An Oil Price Rebound

With the case giving producers a greater financial incentive to declare bankruptcy, we could see such filings increase. Obviously posing a risk for equity holders — and also for midstream companies, which could see a rising amount of contract business disappear in the bankruptcy courts.

Watch for more cases of canceled contracts emerging. And possible write-downs and loss of income at midstream firms as a result.

Here’s to running with it

By Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Len B on March 11 2016 said:
    And WPZ being the prime target of that with CHK contracts.....that would be a disaster for WPZ & WMB given what they paid for recent assets

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News