• 3 minutes "Biden Is Running U.S. Energy Security Into The Ground" by Irina Slav
  • 6 minutes How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 9 minutes "How to Calculate Your Individual ESG Score to ensure that your Digital ID 'benefits' and money are accessible"
  • 1 day GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 7 days 87,000 new IRS agents, higher taxes, and a massive green energy slush fund... "Here Are The Winners And Losers In The 'Inflation Reduction Act'"-ZeroHedge
  • 5 days Energy Armageddon
  • 3 days "Natural Gas Price Fundamental Daily Forecast – Grinding Toward Summer Highs Despite Huge Short Interest" by James Hyerczyk & REUTERS on NatGas
  • 16 hours "Forget Oil, The Real Crisis Is Diesel Inventories: The US Has Just 25 Days Left" by Zero Hedge - 5 Stars *****
  • 22 hours "The Global Digital ID Prison" by James Corbett of CorbettReport.com
  • 19 hours "Europe’s Energy Crisis Has Ended Its Era Of Abundance" by Irina Slav
  • 23 hours The Federal Reserve and Money...Aspects which are not widely known
  • 4 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 2 days Is Europe heading for winter of discontent with extensive gas shortages?
  • 5 days Сryptocurrency predictions
  • 2 days Goldman Betting on Cryptocurrencies
  • 10 days Putin and Xi Bet on the Global South
Felicity Bradstock

Felicity Bradstock

Felicity Bradstock is a freelance writer specialising in Energy and Finance. She has a Master’s in International Development from the University of Birmingham, UK.

More Info

Premium Content

Consequences Or Cooperation: How Will The U.S. Deal With OPEC?

  • Tensions between OPEC and the U.S. have spiked in the last year, particularly after the decision by OPEC+ to cut oil production by 2 million barrels per day in November.
  • The failure of both pleas and threats from Biden to influence the oil cartel’s decision suggests OPEC members are increasingly uninterested in U.S. concerns.
  • Now, as the NOPEC bill hits the Senate floor and the mid-terms loom, it seems that relations between OPEC and the U.S. could be at a turning point.

The relationship between the U.S. and OPEC has always been a fraught one, with America pushing the cartel to slash production when oil prices crash and open the taps when prices soar. While cooperation between the two oil and gas powers is normally focused on supply and demand considerations, geopolitical tensions heavily influence any outcome. Today, as tensions between OPEC and the U.S. spike, the timing for both the global economy and energy markets couldn’t be worse.

While challenges to the U.S.-OPEC relationship are nothing new, tensions have spiked in the post-pandemic context, made worse by ongoing global energy shortages and rising prices. The shift became clearer than ever this month when, at an OPEC news conference, Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman was asked whether the group’s decision to cut production by 2 million barrels a day was an act of aggression and he responded by laughing and asking “where is the act of belligerence?”. OPEC’s Secretary General then added, “everything has a price, energy security has a price as well”.

Earlier this month, OPEC+ announced it would be lowering its member states' production target by 2 million bpd. Both the U.S. and European powers were outraged about the cut, which will serve to worsen both the energy crisis and inflation. But OPEC+ insists that its move was in response to global economic uncertainties and rising inflation, which it feared would drive down oil demand. The organization claims it wants to avoid another pandemic-like situation in which countries worldwide are forced to stockpile excess oil as demand plummets. 

OPEC has been criticized for its decision, with member states prioritizing high oil prices which will both hurt the global economy and help Russia to fund its invasion of Ukraine. President Biden warned that Saudi Arabia will face consequences for the decision to cut production, hoping that threats will be more effective than his pleas earlier this year that the country boost production in order to ensure supply and lower prices. After oil prices dropped from a high of $120 a barrel to around $80 a barrel over the summer months, OPEC members claim to have grown worried that supply would overshoot demand, driving them to support the production cut. For outside observers, however, it's hard to ignore the geopolitical implications of this decision.

Tensions between the U.S. and OPEC+ have been mounting for years, with different geopolitical perspectives and partnerships influencing their contrasting approaches to global energy market management. In the post-pandemic environment, the geopolitical influence of OPEC, and notably Saudi Arabia has grown. Saudi Arabia has managed to strengthen its ties with both Russia and China while maintaining its relationship with the U.S. Now, as the U.S. looks to keep prices low, it is clear that Biden has far less influence over his allies in the region than he had hoped. In realizing this lack of influence, the U.S. is determined to reassert itself.

The U.S. has threatened action against OPEC’s decisions several times in recent years. The No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act (or, the NOPEC bill) was put to U.S. Congress in response to OPEC being an “unlawful monopolist”. But, despite threats, no action has ever been taken, as the consequences both geopolitically and for oil markets would be unpredictable. Despite the U.S. introducing a NOPEC-style bill around 16 times since 2000, the bill has always failed to pass. On Tuesday, the NOPEC bill was once again moved to the Senate floor, although it likely won’t be debated until after the mid-terms.

As the mid-terms approach, tensions between the U.S. and OPEC are soaring once again. The immediate impact of higher fuel prices, energy bills, and inflation on the electorate will be of primary concern to Biden, but the broader trend is also worrying. The U.S. will be eager to increase its influence over OPEC, whether through consequences or cooperation. In the past, these moments of tension have eventually cooled and cooperation has restarted, but we live in uncertain times and Russia’s war in Ukraine and a global energy shortage may push the U.S. to take more aggressive action.

By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads from Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on October 20 2022 said:
    OPEC+ is the world’s most influential player. Its objectives are to maintain stability in the global oil market, a Brent crude which is rewarding for its members but also not harmful to the global economy and energy security for the world.

    It can operate at its best when there is no interference in its decisions and no threats to itself and its members. It prefers cooperation with those concerned but it will retaliate if threatened or sued under false pretences.

    The United States behaviour toward OPEC since its founding in 1960 and later toward OPEC+ was abominable. It wanted to destroy the organization or at least undermine it or at best bring it under its thumb.

    Examples abound:

    1- When US shale oil was a force to be reckoned with, US oil producers were encouraged by the government to overproduce even at a loss to undermine OPEC decisions and force prices down without any thoughts to the livelihood of the OPEC producers.

    2- Former President Trump often threatened OPEC+ members if they didn’t increase production to help reduce oil prices for the benefit of the US economy.

    3- President Biden repeatedly asked OPEC+ to increase production to stem the rise in oil prices when neither the world nor OPEC+ had a spare production capacity because of underinvestment spurred by Western countries’ green policies.

    Yet, President Biden is accusing OPEC+ of supply and price manipulation when the US is a past master in the manipulation of oil supply and prices. Few examples will support my claim.

    1- Former President Trump urging US shale oil producers to overproduce even at loss and flood the global oil market so as to force the oil price down.

    2- President Biden’s release of 195 million barrels from the SPR so far to force down oil prices thus interfering with free market operations.

    3- President Biden repeated calls to OPEC+ to increase production for his own political benefits.

    4- The US and the EU capping the price of Russian crude exports despite the fact that Russia is a member of OPEC+.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News