• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 3 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 15 mins The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 2 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 8 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 1 hour Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 13 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 12 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 8 hours Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 58 mins WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 22 hours California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 12 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 21 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 14 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
Alt Text

$90 Oil Is A Very Real Possibility

Saudi Arabia appears intent on…

Alt Text

This Is Why Canada Lost The LNG Race

Just recently, it seemed as…

Alt Text

Can China Afford To Slap Tariffs On U.S. Oil?

China’s latest round of tariffs…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Canadian Oil Trapped Without More Pipeline Capacity

Canadian Oil Trapped Without More Pipeline Capacity

Adding insult to injury for Canada’s oil industry, Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton came out against the Keystone XL Pipeline on September 22, ending several years of silence and waffling on the controversial issue.

That comes as a blow to TransCanada, the project’s backer, who wanted to connect Canada’s oil sands to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast. The 1,179-mile pipeline would allow 830,000 barrels of oil per day to be exported from Canada. Clinton’s opposition will add some pressure on the U.S. President to reject the pipeline, which looks increasingly likely.

But if the pipeline is rejected, it won’t just be bad news for TransCanada, but also for Canada’s larger oil industry. Canadian crude trades at a discount to WTI, in part because of a lack of pipeline capacity. That discount has fluctuated over the years – ranging from $40 at a high point to around $15 today – but the bigger the discount, the more revenue is lost by Canada’s oil producers. Related: Peak Oil Has More To Do With Oil Prices Than You May Think

Now with oil prices less than half of what they were from a year ago, the discount that Canada’s oil sector must sell their oil for is even more painful. “At $100 a barrel it was a big concern. At $45 a barrel, that is a far larger percentage (of revenue) and is likely the difference between profitable and unprofitable on many of the assets,” Tim McMillan, president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), told Reuters in an interview in early September.

Canada’s oil sands tend to suffer from higher production costs compared to U.S. shale. “The competitive position of Alberta has decreased fairly dramatically,” McMillan recently told The Globe and Mail. But part of the costs have to do with the long distance that Canadian oil has to travel, and the scant transit options at its disposal. “We need to have our costs in line. We need to clear the barriers. We can’t afford to pay [a] $20 toll per barrel to get our products to market,” McMillan added.

As such, CAPP says that accelerating the construction of new oil pipelines should be a top priority for the next Canadian government, following the October 19 election. The race for prime minister is currently split evenly between three candidates. New pipeline capacity will be crucial for Canada to be able to erase, or at least cut down on, the discount that Canadian oil must offer. Related: Oil Companies Running Out Of Options

CAPP’s McMillan says that without adequate market access from new pipelines, Canada won’t be competitive. At that point, “we are out of the game,” he said, according to the National Post. The collapse in oil prices forced CAPP to downgrade its long-term assessment for Canada’s oil production in June. Instead of the 6.4 million barrels per day (mb/d) that CAPP predicted would be produced in Canada in 2030, the projection was revised down to just 5.3 mb/d, as low prices force cutbacks in investment, which will lead to lower production over time.

Indeed, the cuts are underway. French oil giant Total announced on September 21 that it would sell 10 percent of its stake in its Fort Hills project in Alberta. Suncor Energy will buy the interest for $300 million and expects to move forward on the project’s development, but Total will retrench and focus on assets outside of Canada that it thinks are more competitive.

And oil major ConocoPhillips is closing in on a deal to sell several of its assets in Western Canada. Related: Iran Deal May Redefine The Middle East

With falling investment and the potential that oil prices stay “lower for longer,” the “era of big megaprojects” in Canada’s oil sands could be over, says Peter Tertzakian of ARC Financial. “The oil sands has to compete for capital with all the other types of oil projects that are out there. It has to morph into something cleaner, smaller in size and less capital intensive. It’s definitely possible to do, but the old paradigm of 4,000-man camps and long construction periods is over,” Tertzakian told Alberta Oil Magazine this month. And the problem isn’t just that oil companies are being more cautious by deferring spending on projects. Institutional investors are also balking at putting money up for oil sands projects. “There’s zero interest in investing in the space right now,” Tertzakian said.

In CAPP’s June assessment of the long-term status of Canada’s oil industry, the group said that the construction of pipelines is the top priority. But with the U.S. potentially closing the door on Keystone XL, the industry will have to find another way. Otherwise, less oil will be flowing from Canada’s oil sands.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • John Clark on September 23 2015 said:
    Perhaps a rail car will blow up in some truly horrendous manner in Wynn's backyard. Then she may be obliged to give some consideration to the Eastern pipeline.
    As it stands now one has to wonder if she's even Canadian!
  • Earl Richards on September 24 2015 said:
    The Keystone XL pipeline has to be stopped, because a toxic, tar sands spill down into the Ogallala Aquifer will poison the drinking water for millions, which is worse than a weapon of mass destruction, and will destroy the agriculture of the Great Plains states.
  • Joe on September 24 2015 said:
    Right Earl, I assume your tongue is firmly in your cheek for that comment. Thank goodness for all that nice clean American shale oil from the Dakota's moving along the current Keystone, and other pipelines. Its this invasive Canadian oil that will destroy the environment.
  • Martin on September 29 2015 said:
    We in the US don't need this pipeline. The pipeline will be owned by a foreign corporation pumping foreign oil across our country that won't be subject to US taxes because of NAFTA to be processed in a couple of refineries for foreign export. One of the refineries is 50% owned by the Saudis. After it is built most of the monitoring of the pipeline will be automated so new jobs created will be about as many full time employees as a couple of strip malls. The EPA will be adding people to monitor TransCanada operations in our country and the new processing equipment for tar sands oil so there will be some new government jobs, also. The amount of oil from the pipeline isn't anywhere near enough to have any effect on the price of oil. The pipeline will make huge sums of money for TransCanada and the Alberta oil drillers when the price of oil comes back up.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News