• 7 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 9 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 11 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 12 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 13 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 14 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 16 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 17 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 19 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 20 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 1 day Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 1 day British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 1 day Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

What’s Stopping An Oil Price Rally?

Oil prices rallied in Q3…

Alt Text

Russia And China Continue To Boost Oil Ties

The Russia-China alliance is strengthening…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Canadian Oil Trapped Without More Pipeline Capacity

Canadian Oil Trapped Without More Pipeline Capacity

Adding insult to injury for Canada’s oil industry, Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton came out against the Keystone XL Pipeline on September 22, ending several years of silence and waffling on the controversial issue.

That comes as a blow to TransCanada, the project’s backer, who wanted to connect Canada’s oil sands to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast. The 1,179-mile pipeline would allow 830,000 barrels of oil per day to be exported from Canada. Clinton’s opposition will add some pressure on the U.S. President to reject the pipeline, which looks increasingly likely.

But if the pipeline is rejected, it won’t just be bad news for TransCanada, but also for Canada’s larger oil industry. Canadian crude trades at a discount to WTI, in part because of a lack of pipeline capacity. That discount has fluctuated over the years – ranging from $40 at a high point to around $15 today – but the bigger the discount, the more revenue is lost by Canada’s oil producers. Related: Peak Oil Has More To Do With Oil Prices Than You May Think

Now with oil prices less than half of what they were from a year ago, the discount that Canada’s oil sector must sell their oil for is even more painful. “At $100 a barrel it was a big concern. At $45 a barrel, that is a far larger percentage (of revenue) and is likely the difference between profitable and unprofitable on many of the assets,” Tim McMillan, president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), told Reuters in an interview in early September.

Canada’s oil sands tend to suffer from higher production costs compared to U.S. shale. “The competitive position of Alberta has decreased fairly dramatically,” McMillan recently told The Globe and Mail. But part of the costs have to do with the long distance that Canadian oil has to travel, and the scant transit options at its disposal. “We need to have our costs in line. We need to clear the barriers. We can’t afford to pay [a] $20 toll per barrel to get our products to market,” McMillan added.

As such, CAPP says that accelerating the construction of new oil pipelines should be a top priority for the next Canadian government, following the October 19 election. The race for prime minister is currently split evenly between three candidates. New pipeline capacity will be crucial for Canada to be able to erase, or at least cut down on, the discount that Canadian oil must offer. Related: Oil Companies Running Out Of Options

CAPP’s McMillan says that without adequate market access from new pipelines, Canada won’t be competitive. At that point, “we are out of the game,” he said, according to the National Post. The collapse in oil prices forced CAPP to downgrade its long-term assessment for Canada’s oil production in June. Instead of the 6.4 million barrels per day (mb/d) that CAPP predicted would be produced in Canada in 2030, the projection was revised down to just 5.3 mb/d, as low prices force cutbacks in investment, which will lead to lower production over time.

Indeed, the cuts are underway. French oil giant Total announced on September 21 that it would sell 10 percent of its stake in its Fort Hills project in Alberta. Suncor Energy will buy the interest for $300 million and expects to move forward on the project’s development, but Total will retrench and focus on assets outside of Canada that it thinks are more competitive.

And oil major ConocoPhillips is closing in on a deal to sell several of its assets in Western Canada. Related: Iran Deal May Redefine The Middle East

With falling investment and the potential that oil prices stay “lower for longer,” the “era of big megaprojects” in Canada’s oil sands could be over, says Peter Tertzakian of ARC Financial. “The oil sands has to compete for capital with all the other types of oil projects that are out there. It has to morph into something cleaner, smaller in size and less capital intensive. It’s definitely possible to do, but the old paradigm of 4,000-man camps and long construction periods is over,” Tertzakian told Alberta Oil Magazine this month. And the problem isn’t just that oil companies are being more cautious by deferring spending on projects. Institutional investors are also balking at putting money up for oil sands projects. “There’s zero interest in investing in the space right now,” Tertzakian said.

In CAPP’s June assessment of the long-term status of Canada’s oil industry, the group said that the construction of pipelines is the top priority. But with the U.S. potentially closing the door on Keystone XL, the industry will have to find another way. Otherwise, less oil will be flowing from Canada’s oil sands.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • John Clark on September 23 2015 said:
    Perhaps a rail car will blow up in some truly horrendous manner in Wynn's backyard. Then she may be obliged to give some consideration to the Eastern pipeline.
    As it stands now one has to wonder if she's even Canadian!
  • Earl Richards on September 24 2015 said:
    The Keystone XL pipeline has to be stopped, because a toxic, tar sands spill down into the Ogallala Aquifer will poison the drinking water for millions, which is worse than a weapon of mass destruction, and will destroy the agriculture of the Great Plains states.
  • Joe on September 24 2015 said:
    Right Earl, I assume your tongue is firmly in your cheek for that comment. Thank goodness for all that nice clean American shale oil from the Dakota's moving along the current Keystone, and other pipelines. Its this invasive Canadian oil that will destroy the environment.
  • Martin on September 29 2015 said:
    We in the US don't need this pipeline. The pipeline will be owned by a foreign corporation pumping foreign oil across our country that won't be subject to US taxes because of NAFTA to be processed in a couple of refineries for foreign export. One of the refineries is 50% owned by the Saudis. After it is built most of the monitoring of the pipeline will be automated so new jobs created will be about as many full time employees as a couple of strip malls. The EPA will be adding people to monitor TransCanada operations in our country and the new processing equipment for tar sands oil so there will be some new government jobs, also. The amount of oil from the pipeline isn't anywhere near enough to have any effect on the price of oil. The pipeline will make huge sums of money for TransCanada and the Alberta oil drillers when the price of oil comes back up.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News