• 1 day PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 1 day Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

The U.S. Shale Play To Watch In 2018

The original U.S. shale gas…

Alt Text

Aggressive OPEC Pushes Oil Prices Up

Oil prices are once again…

Alt Text

A New Oil Crisis Is Developing In The Middle East

As Iraqi-Kurds prepare to fight…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Alberta's Citizens Against Growing Chinese Efforts to Acquire Energy Assets

Alberta's Citizens Against Growing Chinese Efforts to Acquire Energy Assets

The conservative government of Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has been assiduously touting China as a vast new potential energy market for Canada’s hydrocarbon exports, most notably Alberta’s rising bitumen oil sands production.

How the citizens of the Canada’s Alberta province feel about Harper’s outreach to China, which is seeking to acquire Canadian energy assets, has been revealed in a recent survey by the China Institute of the University of Alberta.

Why the fuss?

Three months ago China’s State-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp. proposed buying Canada’s Nexen Inc., paying roughly $15.1 billion would for Nexen Inc.'s common and preferred shares. Nexen Inc., an oil and gas company based in Calgary, Alberta, has worldwide operations including the North Sea, Colombia, the Gulf of Mexico, and Alberta's Athabasca Oil Sands.

In its second annual survey of Albertan public opinion, “2012 Annual Alberta Survey – Albertan’s views on China,” which polled 1,210 people, the Institute found that the province’s population’s views on China’s increasing regional influence are mixed at best. Harper recently acknowledged as much in response to a recent question in the House of Commons in Ottawa, with Harper admitting that that Chinese companies have been able to invest easily in Canada, while Canadian investments in China have been more difficult, telling his House of Commons audience in the capital Ottawa, “Canada has had a situation with the People’s Republic of China for some years where their investment has been virtually unrestricted here and we have had more difficulty with our investment there.”

And the survey?

According to the University of Alberta’s China Institute director Gordon Houlden, “They are opposed to the idea of full ownership by China and are also adverse to investments in Alberta by Chinese State-Owned enterprises, when you talk about Chinese SEO’s, the numbers are negative. It’s hard to know from the survey whether it’s just China or foreigners owning Albertan businesses. But clearly when you get to full ownership, or ownership by Chinese State Enterprises, the resistance to selling the properties (oil properties) starts to spike considerably. We’re a few weeks away from a federal decision on that sale, so this is now highly timely information. This is not by any means a blue print for action. It’s simply stock taking of the views of Albertans in the summer of this year, and on the positive side a solid majority of Albertans support selling Albertan oil to China.”

Related Article: Alberta's Citizens Against Growing Chinese Efforts to Acquire Energy Assets

The essence of the survey?

“Questions concerning the issue of Chinese investment in Alberta, however, solicited more guarded responses. While Albertans are evenly split on the issue of whether partial ownership of an Alberta-based firm by Chinese investors is acceptable, they are decidedly opposed to the idea of full ownership, and are also largely adverse toward investment in Alberta by a Chinese state-owned enterprise (SOE).”

Speaking further about the poll, Houlden added that the numbers were much more extreme when it came to full ownership of Nexen by China, with only 15 per cent agreeing it would be acceptable, 64 per cent disagreeing and 21 per cent neither agreed nor disagreed, noting, "When it comes to investment, Albertans are on balance negative in their views. When it comes to full ownership, in particular, of Alberta-based companies by Chinese enterprises, it's seen as undesirable. On balance, it's a mix of positive negative. Albertans are quite conflicted in their views of China.”

Houlden is hardly uninformed, as he is a former Canadian diplomat who's been posted five times to China.

The Nexen-CNOOC deal is currently being evaluated by federal Industry Minister Christian Paradis, who conclude by 11 November whether the transaction is of "net benefit" to Canada.

CNOOC’s anxieties over approval of the contract have been heightened since Ottawa's surprise rejection on 19 October of Malaysian company Petronas' $6 billion proposed of Calgary-based natural gas producer Progress Energy Resources.

So, which will win out?

Rising Canadian xenophobic nationalism or Ottawa’s commitment to “free trade?”

The answer is currently unclear, to put it mildly.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • SL Anderson on October 28 2012 said:
    Seems pretty clear to me that the people of Alberta do not want foreign control of there natural resources. From what you wrote in the article, I fail to see any xenophobic nationalism, if there is anything in the survey you've seen to suggest that, you should put it in the article.
    I've been watching things unfold in Alberta weather it be pipelines or sales of company's to foreign entities (esp. state owned foreign entities). It is in my opinion one must be very apprehensive. This isn't about nationalism so much as it's about the people, there resources and environment vs. corporations and there influence with government.
  • CoCoRiCo on October 28 2012 said:
    The US Congress and BUSH junior slammed the door on CNOOC over the UNOCAL deal. To my knowledge, that message resonated loud and clear. I do not believe there was another attempt by Chinese interests for American oil assets since 2005.
    If the Conservatives say no to the Malaysians, I don’t see why they would accept the Chinese bid. Personally, I would let both deals go through. If push comes to shove in the energy markets, the ultimate weapon of a sovereign state is confiscation. We make it sound better by using euphemisms like nationalization or strategic materials. We did it once, we can do it again!

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News