• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 6 days They pay YOU to TAKE Natural Gas
  • 3 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 3 days What fool thought this was a good idea...
  • 12 hours A question...
  • 5 days Why does this keep coming up? (The Renewable Energy Land Rush Could Threaten Food Security)
  • 12 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.

Breaking News:

Venezuela Bans Bitcoin Mining

Biden To Hike Tariffs on Chinese EVs and Clean Energy Tech

Biden To Hike Tariffs on Chinese EVs and Clean Energy Tech

The Biden Administration is preparing…

Groundhog Day for OPEC+

Groundhog Day for OPEC+

Ahead of a critical meeting…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Premium Content

Alberta's Citizens Against Growing Chinese Efforts to Acquire Energy Assets

Alberta's Citizens Against Growing Chinese Efforts to Acquire Energy Assets

The conservative government of Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has been assiduously touting China as a vast new potential energy market for Canada’s hydrocarbon exports, most notably Alberta’s rising bitumen oil sands production.

How the citizens of the Canada’s Alberta province feel about Harper’s outreach to China, which is seeking to acquire Canadian energy assets, has been revealed in a recent survey by the China Institute of the University of Alberta.

Why the fuss?

Three months ago China’s State-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp. proposed buying Canada’s Nexen Inc., paying roughly $15.1 billion would for Nexen Inc.'s common and preferred shares. Nexen Inc., an oil and gas company based in Calgary, Alberta, has worldwide operations including the North Sea, Colombia, the Gulf of Mexico, and Alberta's Athabasca Oil Sands.

In its second annual survey of Albertan public opinion, “2012 Annual Alberta Survey – Albertan’s views on China,” which polled 1,210 people, the Institute found that the province’s population’s views on China’s increasing regional influence are mixed at best. Harper recently acknowledged as much in response to a recent question in the House of Commons in Ottawa, with Harper admitting that that Chinese companies have been able to invest easily in Canada, while Canadian investments in China have been more difficult, telling his House of Commons audience in the capital Ottawa, “Canada has had a situation with the People’s Republic of China for some years where their investment has been virtually unrestricted here and we have had more difficulty with our investment there.”

And the survey?

According to the University of Alberta’s China Institute director Gordon Houlden, “They are opposed to the idea of full ownership by China and are also adverse to investments in Alberta by Chinese State-Owned enterprises, when you talk about Chinese SEO’s, the numbers are negative. It’s hard to know from the survey whether it’s just China or foreigners owning Albertan businesses. But clearly when you get to full ownership, or ownership by Chinese State Enterprises, the resistance to selling the properties (oil properties) starts to spike considerably. We’re a few weeks away from a federal decision on that sale, so this is now highly timely information. This is not by any means a blue print for action. It’s simply stock taking of the views of Albertans in the summer of this year, and on the positive side a solid majority of Albertans support selling Albertan oil to China.”

Related Article: Alberta's Citizens Against Growing Chinese Efforts to Acquire Energy Assets

The essence of the survey?

“Questions concerning the issue of Chinese investment in Alberta, however, solicited more guarded responses. While Albertans are evenly split on the issue of whether partial ownership of an Alberta-based firm by Chinese investors is acceptable, they are decidedly opposed to the idea of full ownership, and are also largely adverse toward investment in Alberta by a Chinese state-owned enterprise (SOE).”

Speaking further about the poll, Houlden added that the numbers were much more extreme when it came to full ownership of Nexen by China, with only 15 per cent agreeing it would be acceptable, 64 per cent disagreeing and 21 per cent neither agreed nor disagreed, noting, "When it comes to investment, Albertans are on balance negative in their views. When it comes to full ownership, in particular, of Alberta-based companies by Chinese enterprises, it's seen as undesirable. On balance, it's a mix of positive negative. Albertans are quite conflicted in their views of China.”

Houlden is hardly uninformed, as he is a former Canadian diplomat who's been posted five times to China.

The Nexen-CNOOC deal is currently being evaluated by federal Industry Minister Christian Paradis, who conclude by 11 November whether the transaction is of "net benefit" to Canada.

CNOOC’s anxieties over approval of the contract have been heightened since Ottawa's surprise rejection on 19 October of Malaysian company Petronas' $6 billion proposed of Calgary-based natural gas producer Progress Energy Resources.


So, which will win out?

Rising Canadian xenophobic nationalism or Ottawa’s commitment to “free trade?”

The answer is currently unclear, to put it mildly.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • SL Anderson on October 28 2012 said:
    Seems pretty clear to me that the people of Alberta do not want foreign control of there natural resources. From what you wrote in the article, I fail to see any xenophobic nationalism, if there is anything in the survey you've seen to suggest that, you should put it in the article.
    I've been watching things unfold in Alberta weather it be pipelines or sales of company's to foreign entities (esp. state owned foreign entities). It is in my opinion one must be very apprehensive. This isn't about nationalism so much as it's about the people, there resources and environment vs. corporations and there influence with government.
  • CoCoRiCo on October 28 2012 said:
    The US Congress and BUSH junior slammed the door on CNOOC over the UNOCAL deal. To my knowledge, that message resonated loud and clear. I do not believe there was another attempt by Chinese interests for American oil assets since 2005.
    If the Conservatives say no to the Malaysians, I don’t see why they would accept the Chinese bid. Personally, I would let both deals go through. If push comes to shove in the energy markets, the ultimate weapon of a sovereign state is confiscation. We make it sound better by using euphemisms like nationalization or strategic materials. We did it once, we can do it again!

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News