• 6 hours Trump's Revenge: U.S. Oil Floods Europe, Hurting OPEC and Russia
  • 11 hours Twitter bans Kaspersky from advertising
  • 8 hours US eases sanctions on Rusal
  • 1 day Michael Bloomberg Contributes $4.5 Million For Paris Climate Deal After Trump Bails
  • 10 hours Robot-mania: The U.S. Is Way Behind Other Countries On Robot "Readiness"
  • 3 hours Trump Warns Iran Against Restarting Nuclear Program
  • 8 hours Large-Cap Oil Earnings: What to Watch
  • 1 day Iran is panicking right now: Currency crunch and kicking it out of oil market
  • 1 day Oil Prices Hit Highest Level Since 2014
  • 2 hours Oil Falls As Trump Tweet Blasts OPEC
  • 3 hours API Inventory Data (Tuesdays)
  • 1 day Asian Oil Demand To Hit Record - The Price Per Barrel Continues To Grow
  • 1 day Investing in Oil & Gas
  • 16 hours Tesla Says Humans In, Robots Out
  • 1 day Trump: "Larry, go get it done,'” - US to rejoin TPP
  • 15 hours Trump's top energy adviser resigns
Alt Text

19 Oil Tankers Held Hostage Off Yemeni Coast

According to Saudi sources, the…

Alt Text

Are Oil Markets Tightening Too Fast?

OPEC’s oil production continues to…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

$40 Billion LNG Project In Australia Cancelled Amid Low Prices

$40 Billion LNG Project In Australia Cancelled Amid Low Prices

The crash in LNG prices has claimed a major victim. Woodside Petroleum and its partners, which include Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and PetroChina have decided to cancel a massive LNG project in Australia because the economics no longer work.

Related: China’s Oil Majors See Production In Biggest Fields Shrink

The Browse LNG project was planned for Western Australia, a $40 billion floating LNG export facility that would have sent Australian natural gas abroad. Citing the “extremely challenging” market, the project was scrapped on March 22. “It’s very, very difficult for us to invest in this price environment,” Woodside’s CEO Peter Coleman said.

“We’ve got a glut of LNG at the moment and a large number of potential projects out there,” Neil Beveridge, a Hong Kong-based analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., told Bloomberg in an interview. “The interesting question for Woodside is, ‘What will they do next?’ This removes an organic growth driver.” Related: The Current Oil Price Rally Is Reaching Its Limits

Browse LNG faced an array of setbacks. The project originally had an onshore site in mind, but ran into stiff opposition from local communities. That led the developers to an offshore floating concept, which actually trimmed costs by 35 percent.

Still, with LNG prices a fraction of what they once were, the decision does not come as a surprise. A handful of other large LNG export facilities that have been planned for Australia are also getting second looks. Browse had failed to secure any customers for its planned capacity, and with LNG prices now down to multiyear lows, it would be much more difficult for this project to turn a profit than for some competing projects that sealed contracts years ago. Related: Chile Sees Unrest In Its Gold And Copper Sectors

For example, Chevron’s $54 billion Gorgon LNG project, which just came online, has raised questions about its long-term profitability. However, Gorgon at least already had most of its capacity under long-term contracts. Woodside’s Browse LNG, even if it found buyers, would struggle to make the numbers work with LNG prices so low. The company’s chief executive said in February that now was “not the time to be reckless” with spending.

LNG prices for April delivery to Asia averaged just $4.46 per million Btu (MMBtu), about one quarter of the price from just two years ago.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News