• 3 minutes Why NG falling n crude up?
  • 7 minutes Tesla Battery Day (announcements on technology)
  • 10 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 1 min The China Daily newspaper just did a flash poll of 1600 Chinese Communist Party members. 98% said Biden won the debate.
  • 5 mins California’s Electric Vehicle Dream Has A Major Problem: No
  • 18 hours Ilhan Omar connected Ballot Harvester in cash-for-ballots scheme
  • 15 mins Something wicked this way comes
  • 22 mins Kalifornistan, CO2, clueless politicians, climate hustle
  • 6 hours What is Best for Germany Now?
  • 2 days Debate Night: Trump needs to be concerned about left leaning Chris Wallace , not Biden
  • 6 hours Permian in for Prosperous and Bright Future
Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Why No One Is Buying Up Shale Assets

Since the start of the year, 57 oil production and oilfield services companies have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Many more bankruptcies are on the way, all in the shale patch. And there does not seem to be even a shred of light at the end of this tunnel. The U.S. shale patch was the pride and joy of the nation’s energy industry. Rightly called a shale revolution, the boom in oil and gas production fueled by hydraulic fracturing turned the United States into the world’s largest oil and gas producer. But this had a cost—a cost that is now being paid with a flurry of bankruptcies.

Rystad Energy said last month it expected another 150 U.S. shale oil companies would file for Chapter 11 protection by the end of the year unless prices rise above $50 a barrel. Others have suggested we might see consolidation, the way the industry consolidates during every crisis, but this time around, that seems unlikely.

When earlier this year, Chevron snapped up Noble Energy in a $5-billion deal, there was the usual talk that this could be the start of a wave of mergers and acquisitions for which the oil industry was ripe: assets were cheap, many asset owners were struggling, and those with the money could expand their asset base at bargain prices. Only it seems this time no one has the money.

Reuters’ Jessica Resnick-Ault, Dmitry Zhdannikov and David Gaffen called it the legacy of the U.S. shale revolution in a recent analysis. Shale drillers grew too much too fast, failing to make any money on the way. After investors got burned not once but twice, few want their business.

The last oil price crisis, the one that did spark a consolidation wave after 2014, was a typical one. Prices dropped, some companies failed, others were bought up by bigger ones, prices rebounded, and production growth was back on track. Investors, however, began to insist on returns instead of growth. Producers were trying to get there when this year’s crisis hit. It is no surprise that potential buyers are wary.

Related: OPEC Production Rises By 950,000 Bpd In August

Debt is a major turn-off. Shale drillers took on debt the way squirrels store nuts for winter. Shale oil production is a capital-intensive business, but this aspect of it was for a long time overshadowed by the fact that oil starts flowing a lot more quickly from a fracked shale well than a conventional one. So drillers took on debt and boosted production to repay this debt. It became a vicious circle that the last crisis may have well put a stop to.

Banks became reluctant to extend shale oil drillers’ credit lines even before the Saudis turned the taps on and Covid-19 spread across the world. New wells were not yielding as much as borrowers had said they would, and debt piles were growing. Then the pandemic came, and drillers started falling under the twin weight of billions in debt and $20 oil. 

Again, these falls mean there is cheap acreage for sale, and some of it may well be excellent acreage. But there is one more reason in addition to general wariness why there are few buyers: the industry does not seem to believe that there will be a third shale revolution.

The last crisis sparked a shift in priorities, Argus Media’s Tom Fowler reported recently. Growth at all costs is no longer priority number one. Smart growth is, which means sucking out every last barrel of oil from a well before buying more acreage to drill more wells. What is more, investors have not stopped insisting on getting higher returns rather than higher production, and companies have been listening. With a focus on fully developing their already existing assets and pressure from investors to boost returns, asset-buying appetite is very likely to remain low for a while. It could be a long while unless oil prices soar in the near future.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on September 03 2020 said:
    Since its inception in 2008, the US shale revolution has been a battleground between economics and geopolitics. Geopolitics dictated that US shale oil drillers produce recklessly irrespective of profits to enable the United States to claim the unachievable goals of oil self-sufficiency and energy dominance. They ended up with huge debts, hundreds of bankruptcies and stranded assets that nobody wants to buy. As expected, economics always prevails in the final analysis. This is the story of the US shale oil industry.

    The evidence is blatantly clear to anybody wanting to have an objective analysis. Since the start of this year, 57 oil production and oilfield services companies have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Many more bankruptcies are on the way with 150 more expected to file for Chapter 11 protection by the end of the year unless prices rise above $50 a barrel. Moreover, debts are now estimated at hundreds of billions of dollars. After investors got burned not once but twice, few want their business.

    Baker Hughes’ oil rig count is a real measure of oil industry activity. If this is the case, then the US shale oil industry is in a far worse shape than many would admit with the prospect of a comeback soon getting further away by the day.

    According to Baker Hughes, US oil rigs have steeply declined from 744 a year ago to 172 now. This means that shale oil production which accounts for more than 60% of total US oil production currently amounts to only 1.8 million barrels a day (mbd). Adding a conventional oil production of 4.9 mbd will give a US production of 6.7 mbd meaning that the US oil industry has lost 6.4 mbd so far this year. And yet, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) is still telling the world that US production has only declined by 2 mbd from 13 mbd to 11 mbd as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic..

    Based on the above, US oil production will be struggling this year and the following ones to even produce 6-7 mbd.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Dan Pearson on September 12 2020 said:
    How can the US production be off by such as large margin from what is stated in Dr Mamdouh G Salameh's Comments here?

    I'm not disputing the Dr's comments at all due to my respect for Dr Mamdouh G Salameh, but this vast difference between what the EIA says the US is producing ( 11 mmbopd ), and the 6.7 mmbopd the Dr says is being produced.

    This large amount of difference needs to be rectified. Anyone that can add some comment here would be very helpful:

    What is the real production rate? And why is there such a vast difference between 11 mmbopd & 6.7 mmbopd. . A difference of 4.3 mmbopd is very significant and it will drive markets in different directions due to this large margin of 4.3 mmbopd.

    Regards, and I look forward in some further comments here.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News