• 4 minutes China goes against US natural gas
  • 12 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 15 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 19 mins Downloadable 3D Printed Gun Designs, Yay or Nay?
  • 10 hours Rattling With Weapons: Iran Must Develop Military To Guard Against Other Powers
  • 16 hours Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 5 hours Russians hacking vs U.S., Microsoft President: Russians Targeting All Political Sides
  • 5 hours VW Receives Massive Order Of 1,600 All-Electric Trucks
  • 13 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 17 hours CO2 Emissions Hit 67-Year Low In USA, As Rest-Of-World Rises
  • 10 hours Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 20 hours The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 1 day Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 11 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 1 day How To Explain 'Truth Isn't Truth' Comment of Rudy Giuliani?
  • 1 day The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
Alt Text

Why Is Big Oil So Excited About Alaskan Crude?

Alaskan officials have just published…

Alt Text

Indonesia Books Sharp Drop In Oil Imports

Indonesia reported a substantial decline…

Dan Dicker

Dan Dicker

Dan Dicker is a 25 year veteran of the New York Mercantile Exchange where he traded crude oil, natural gas, unleaded gasoline and heating oil…

More Info

Trending Discussions

US Shale Winners And Losers – Part Two

In going over the 3rd quarter reports from the US E+P’s, the report from Continental Resources (CLR) was the most interesting to me. Harold Hamm, CEO of Continental, was virtually alone in cutting 2015 capex and production guidance, a move obviously designed to help weather what I’m calling an $80-oil winter of sustained low oil prices. In contrast, virtually every other CEO has “whistled through the graveyard” in refusing to adjust spend and production targets as part of their 3rd quarter conference calls. Considering that Continental is by far the best positioned Bakken E+P and Harold Hamm perhaps the smartest oilman ever, I tend to think his lone honest assessment to be far more on target than everyone else.

We are going to see some major production and spend declines caused by $80 oil, and they will be financially forced upon some players who don’t have the resilience of a Continental Resources.

Let’s look at some of the possible problem players in the Bakken to continue on with our series on shale production winners and losers.

In part one, we isolated some of the attributes of producers likely to show strain from sustained low oil: rickety balance sheets, high yield debt, holdings outside the core of the Nesson Anticline and behind the curve technology and efficiencies being a few. With this in mind, a couple of companies working in the Williston Basin appear in likely trouble over the next six months. Again, my thanks…

To read the full article

Please sign up and become a premium OilPrice.com member to gain access to read the full article.

RegisterLogin

Trending Discussions





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News