Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!


CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

  • 3 minutes Texas forced to have rolling brown outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 7 minutes Scientists Warn That Filling The Sahara With Solar Panels Is A Bad Idea
  • 11 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 15 minutes Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 1 day America Makes Plans to Produce Needed Rare Earth Minerals Domestically
  • 10 hours Texas forced to have rolling black outs, primarily because of large declines in output from fossil fuel power plants
  • 1 day U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 3 days Former BP Exec "Biden not in war against oil" . . Really ?
  • 3 days Here we go - again: plug-in hybrids cost motorists more than what they were told
  • 3 days Texas Supply Chain Massacre
  • 1 day Top Conservative Lawyer Says Trump Can Stand Trial
  • 1 day “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 3 days An exciting development in EV Aviation: Volocopter
Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

U.S. Ban On Saudi Oil Could Force Riyadh To Reroute 40 Million Barrels

Saudi Arabia may be forced to reroute tankers carrying some 40 million barrels of crude oil to the United States if President Trump goes through with a threat to ban imports, Reuters has reported, citing shipping data and unnamed sources.

There have been reports that Washington is discussing a ban on Saudi imports of crude oil or impose tariffs to stem the decline in U.S. oil prices. When President Trump first floated the idea of oil import tariffs, it was taken as a threat to large oil exporters to the U.S. such as Saudi Arabia to finally reach an output cut agreement with their partners in OPEC+. Now, the stakes are higher.

According to Reuters’ sources, Saudi Arabia had first tried to seek storage options for the oil now at sea. Many tanker owners, however, were unwilling to agree to such a change in plans as it would have meant stranding tankers, with the prospects of finding a buyer quickly grim.

Aramco “offers its larger customers with refineries in multiple regions of the world optionality to take their crude purchases from Aramco into the region,” the company told Reuters in a statement. “Changes in ship destinations are routine in the course of our business, particularly in a company of our scale.”

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that at least one in every ten Very Large Crude Carriers capable of holding up to 2 million barrels of oil is now serving as floating storage, with many of them full of unsold Saudi oil.

Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that the volume of Saudi crude en route to the United States was seven times higher than the typical monthly intake of Saudi oil in 2019. These vessels, however, were loaded before OPEC+ struck the deal to cut 9.7 million bpd from its collective output beginning in May.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • William Pittman on April 23 2020 said:
    Even without Presidential ban, couldn't the TX and LA governors ban unloading the Saudi crude at their ports? Same with other oil producing states with ports where imported oil is unloaded.
  • Norm Dill on April 24 2020 said:
    Trump has proved to be particularly vulnerable to Saudi manipulation. I doubt he will follow through, I doubt he intends to follow through. He is being a big backer of Saudi Arabia from the start. That's the relationship that is far more suspicious than anything to do with Russia ever was.

    I guess there's the possibility of tariffs if the price stays too low or if the Saudis engage in a price war again, but that's a 50/50 bed at best I think. Trump is very soft on the Saudis.
  • blue charm on April 25 2020 said:
    The OPEC+ production cuts will clearly not be sufficient to balance the market in the face of such historic demand destruction.
  • ema chris on April 25 2020 said:
    shale producers have a relatively high cost base, many of them also high leverage. Allowing too many bankruptcies in this space would have a devastating effect on some of their lenders.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News