• 3 minutes Biden Seeks $2 Trillion Clean Energy And Infrastructure Spending Boost
  • 5 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 8 minutes Gazprom fails to exempt Nord Stream-2 from EU market rules
  • 9 hours The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
  • 1 hour Trumpist lies about coronavirus too bad for Facebook - BANNED!
  • 10 hours The World is Facing a Solar Panel Waste Problem
  • 1 day The Core Issue Of US Chaos..Finally disclosed
  • 7 hours Pompeo upsets China; oil & gas prices to fall
  • 23 hours Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 13 hours China's impending economic meltdown
  • 8 hours Why Oil could hit $100
  • 2 days Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 12 hours Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 18 hours Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
  • 12 hours Sell Natural Gas Benefits to Grow the Market!
  • 12 hours Trump Suggests Delaying Election Amid Fraud Claims
  • 2 days Russia Trying To Steal COVID-19 Vaccine Data, Say UK, U.S. and Canada
Oil Prices Soar After EIA Reports Large Crude Draw

Oil Prices Soar After EIA Reports Large Crude Draw

Oil prices jumped, with Brent…

Trump Vows To Revive U.S. Oil Industry

Trump Vows To Revive U.S. Oil Industry

U.S. President Donald Trump touted…

Simon Watkins

Simon Watkins

Simon Watkins is a former senior FX trader and salesman, financial journalist, and best-selling author. He was Head of Forex Institutional Sales and Trading for…

More Info

Premium Content

The Sad Truth About The OPEC+ Production Cut

Quite aside from the subtler elements of the oil deal announced late last week that are likely to undermine its ability to stave off further oil price lows in the coming weeks, the basic facts of the deal are sufficient to do so: global supply is to be cut by (sort of) 10 million barrels per day (bpd) whilst global demand has fallen by around 30 million bpd. That is really all anyone needs to know and is the key reason why oil prices are likely to continue to test the downside of recent lows and to surpass them over time. Terrible though these raw figures look, the overall deal itself is much worse the more that it is examined in depth, as it is below.

Before the Saudis decided to again gallop gaily into the ranks of the intellectually dispossessed earlier this year by trying exactly the same oil pricing strategy (i.e. bankrupt other producers by overproducing and crashing oil prices) that failed so abysmally from 2014 to 2016, the global oil market was at a fairly balanced point. Oil demand was around 100 million barrels per day (bpd) with the Brent oil price set in the US$50-70 per barrel range, albeit with a bias towards the lower end of that scale. The best U.S. shale producers were able to make decent money above the US$40 per barrel level, as was Russia, which has a budget breakeven price per barrel of Brent of precisely US$40. Only Saudi Arabia was in trouble, with a budget breakeven price of US$84 per barrel of Brent but that was its own fault, a product of the legacy of the aforementioned disastrous price war on shale from 2014 to 2016 and of the various vanity projects and vanity war in Yemen of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS).

Saudi Arabia was continually peeved not just by the fact that it had to pay the price for underestimating the tenacious adaptability of the U.S. shale industry back in 2014 that allowed these producers to reduce breakeven prices from around US$70 per barrel to less than US$40 but also that its efforts to keep oil prices up through various OPEC and OPEC+ agreements were allowing these very shale producers to make a lot more money than the Saudis, relatively speaking. The reason for this was that U.S. shale producers – over 90 per cent of which are still relatively small, independent operators – were not bound in to the OPEC/OPEC+ production quotas so could fill the output gaps created by OPEC producers (Russia, as the significant ‘+’ in ‘OPEC+’, never took any notice of its quotas).

Premium: Where Does Oil Go After The Largest Production Cut In History?

This allowed the U.S. a rolling 3-4 million bpd advantage over Saudi in the oil exports game, meaning that it quickly became the world’s number one oil producer, while Russia (which, remember, ignores all quotas) became number two, and Saudi Arabia (which broadly abides by most of the quotas) trailed at number three. Hence, Saudi Arabia decided initially to unilaterally announce its intention for the last OPEC+ deal to be much bigger than that which it had pre-agreed with Russia, hoping to ambush the Russians into agreeing. Russia, however, turned around and told Saudi Arabia to figuratively go and reproduce with itself. MbS, who has surrounded himself with ‘yes men’ within his government and foreign advisers who are worried about losing his business, then decided to launch an all-out price war.

The reason why this has been such a short-lived war is that - for the reasons outlined above - nobody wanted to tell MbS that he had forgotten to factor in a key element, and that was the deal made in 1945 between the U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Saudi King at the time, Abdulaziz, that has defined the relationship between the two countries ever since. As analyzed in depth in my new book on the global oil markets, the deal that was struck between the two men on board the U.S. Navy cruiser Quincy in the Great Bitter Lake segment of the Suez Canal was that the U.S. would receive all of the oil supplies it needed for as long as Saudi Arabia had oil in place, in return for which the U.S. would guarantee the security of the ruling House of Saud. The deal has altered slightly ever since the rise of the U.S. shale oil industry and Saudi Arabia’s attempt to destroy it from 2014 to 2016, in that the U.S. still guarantees the security of the House of Saud but it also expects Saudi Arabia not only to supply the U.S. with whatever oil it needs for as long as it can but also – and this is key to everything that has followed – it also allows the U.S. shale industry to continue to function and to grow.

As far as the U.S. is concerned, if this means that the Saudis lose out to U.S. shale producers by keeping oil prices up but losing out on export opportunities to these U.S. firms then tough: it is money well spent by the House of Saud for the protection of the U.S. As U.S. President Donald Trump has made clear whenever he has sensed a lack of understanding on the part of Saudi Arabia for the huge benefit that the U.S. is doing the ruling family: “He [Saudi King Salman] would not last in power for two weeks without the backing of the U.S. military.”

Premium: Missiles Fired In Iraq As Proxy War Heats Up

Aside from fundamental mathematical failure of the oil deal, then, what else is wrong with it? For a start, there is the usual nonsense of the ‘baseline levels’ from which production is judged to have been cut. Both Saudi Arabia and Russia are to ‘cut’ around 2.5 million bpd each but only from the production baseline level of about 11 million, according to the OPEC statement last week. However, Saudi has never recorded sustained actual oil production of more than 10.5 million bpd for more than a brief period. The recent often-quoted ‘supply highs’ of over 12 million bpd are not – repeat not – actual production but rather production plus the use of oil inventory.  To put it into historical – and real – terms, the average Saudi production from 1973 to the beginning of this year was 8.15 million barrels per day. This means that the Saudis are not in reality cutting production at all, it is just going to cut back on the use of its oil inventory, which it cannot afford to keep squandering at such low prices anyway. Russia, in the meantime, is geared up to produce around 11 million bpd anyhow – the baseline figure – so again this effectively means no cut, and even if the baseline figure was lower, Russia would take no notice and produce whatever it wanted, as it has done for every OPEC+ deal with which it has been involved, since the first agreed cut in December 2016.

The third key failure of this deal is that the prospect of failure is explicitly built into it, in the form of a sliding scale of production reductions that are to be reviewed on a rolling basis as the market moves forward. Specifically, OPEC+’s tentative plan would see the output curbs dramatically reduced after two months, depending on the evolution of the coronavirus, with the 10 million-barrel-a-day cut liable to be reduced to 8 million a day from July and then to 6 million a day from January 2021 to April 2022, according to the OPEC statement. The group is planning another videoconference 10 June to discuss what additional measures need to be taken, which means that any slim optimism that may have supported oil prices has immediately been undermined with the prospect of a complete change to the parameters of the deal so quickly. With this prospect of reducing production quotas so close, it is also not unreasonable to expect the OPEC and OPEC+ producers to take a less than stringent approach to the absolute level of their oil production or exports, of course, although in the case of Saudi Arabia and Russia, the quotas, as mentioned, are meaningless.

By Simon Watkins for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Barry on April 13 2020 said:
    Simon,

    Well written. The most well thought out and intelligent analysis I’ve read about the OPEC+ agreement (non-agreement).
    Bottom line, you seldom can trust Saudi Arabia and can never trust the Russians.
    Thank you.
  • Barry on April 13 2020 said:
    By end of April:

    WTI-$15-$18
    Brent- $20-$25

    Bet on it!
  • Brian Bresee on April 13 2020 said:
    OPEC+ production cuts are not happening in a vacuum. Even with no deal OPEC+ will be significantly cutting their oil production for the very same reason US producers will, market forces. A producer cannot sell their product for less than the cost of production for very long, a hard reality. What the deal did achieve is it took egos out of the equation, which will make room for market forces to work.

    The goal of breaking US producers will end in failure, while the goal of breaking OPEC and allowing market forces to set the price of oil instead will end in success.

    Oil will not sell for below production cost for long, expect a return to a price of (production cost + profit) soon.
  • Noman Javed on April 14 2020 said:
    Must I say this article was very well put. Providing a backstory, it gives a better explanation of why the recent cut merely had a ripple effect on the prices. Goes to show deals are not always how they seem, especially when it comes to throwing out numbers. Good journalism.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on April 14 2020 said:
    All this repetitive rigmarole is just to tell us what I have been saying in a few succinct words for ages that no matter how big production cuts are they will hardly have a positive impact on oil prices while the coronavirus outbreak is raging.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Steve Brown on April 14 2020 said:
    Where does canada land on all of this. I'm trying to figure out why canada doesnt just tariff foriegn oil (besides the us). In order to strengthen our energy economy. Besides our leader and the environment, does canada have any such deal with the Saudis similar to the states that keeps saudi oil flowing into canada?
  • Liza Gusarova on April 14 2020 said:
    Many thanks for the very interesting and enlightening article which helped me to understand better that recent OPEC deal which is discussed a lot in Russia.
    Not many of us,Rusaians,understand whether Russia gained anything or lost a lot,but with the decline in oil consumption everywhere in the world,that deal has us all very much worried.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News