• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 21 mins Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 12 hours NYT: Mass Immigration Roundups in U.S. to Start Sunday
  • 7 hours White House insider who predicted Iran False Flag, David Goldberg found dead in his New York apartment
  • 32 mins South Korea imports No Oil From Iran in June - First-Half Imports Fall 37%
  • 1 day U.S. Administration Moves To End Asylum Protections For Central Americans
  • 23 hours U.S.- Taiwan: China Says Will Freeze Out U.S. Companies That Sell Arms To Taiwan
  • 9 hours Germany exits coal: A model for Asia?
  • 4 hours Carrot And Stick: North Korea Suggests It Might Lift Weapons Test moratorium
  • 4 hours Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 4 hours Starlink Internet Courtesy of Tesla
  • 5 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 2 days Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 2 days Rising air pollution and green house effect
Alt Text

Libya’s Oil Revenue Takes A Beating

Libya’s oil revenue fell significantly…

Alt Text

Oil Markets Not Impressed By Small Crude Draw

Oil prices fell slightly on…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Premium Content

Oil Companies Ignoring Investors

One unexpected casualty of the oil price downturn is the self-respect of some energy investors. Equity investors are the owners of publicly traded companies and companies’ sole purpose is to act in the best long-term interests of their owners – at least in theory. That dynamic seems to have broken down at one major OFS firm though.

Take Nabors Industries for example. Investors at the company are concerned about a host of issues from board composition and shareholder communication to the firm paying its executives too much at the expense of shareholders. In a sign of that dissatisfaction, investors voted to oust 3 of the directors from the board in the June 7th election. Those directors tendered their resignations, but all three will be keeping their jobs.

Lead director of Nabors, John Yearwood failed to get a majority of shareholder votes at the last four annual meetings – a remarkable feat given that board elections are usually more of a formality than anything. The responsibility to accept Yearwood’s resignation lies with Nabor’s governance and nominating committee. That committee is headed by Yearwood. The other two members of the committee are Michael Lin and Howard Wolf, both of whom were voted out in this year’s election. Nabor’s decided that it would not be fair to have the three directors decide their own fate, so the company appointed a special committee of independent directors to decide what to do. The newly appointed independent committee decided that Lin, Yearwood, and Wolf should all keep their posts regardless of the shareholder vote. This marks the fourth year in a row that a similar situation has played out at Nabors. Nabor’s bylaws give the company the right to ignore shareholder votes because under the bylaws such votes are considered advisory.

Nabor’s is not the only company to take this approach. Of the 2,000 companies on the Russell 3000 index, only 43 directors failed to win majority votes in shareholder elections last year. Yet of those 43 who were voted out, 38 ended up sticking around anyway according to Bloomberg. Related: What Will You Do When The Lights Go Out? The Inevitable Failure Of The US Grid

Nabors is not the only company in a dispute with some of its shareholders, but it may be the firm with the most acrimonious dispute. In six votes held recently on executive compensation, Nabor’s shareholders have voted down executive compensation plans five of the six times with little effect. Only one of the last six plans has been approved by shareholders – the 2015 pay package which cut compensation for Anthony Petrello, Nabor’s CEO, versus previous levels. In the June 7th vote this year, Nabor’s shareholders voted against the CEO’s pay package. Petrello’s pay package this year almost doubled to $27.7 million from $14.8M last year thanks in part to a merger related bonus.

Given the circumstances at Nabor’s it’s unclear if shareholders have any power to directly impact significant change. In most circumstances, the board is supposed to act as advocates of shareholders, but that approach has run into some roadblocks at the company. Nabor’s stock market value today stands at roughly a third of what it was a few years ago, likely due to a combination of investor dissatisfaction and of course the sharp plunge in crude prices. Given that, disaffected shareholders should be hoping for the alternative mechanism to enforce proper corporate governance – a takeover of the company.

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play