• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 2 mins Oil prices going down
  • 21 hours We Need A Lasting Solution To The Lies Told By Big Oil and API
  • 4 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 8 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 4 hours Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 2 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 21 hours Another WTH? Example of Cheap Renewables
  • 3 hours Oil and Trade War
  • 20 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 19 hours The Permian Mystery
  • 13 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 14 hours No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
  • 4 hours Geopolitical and Political Risks make their strong comeback to global oil and gas markets
  • 8 hours Australia mulls LNG import
  • 2 days When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 2 days Russia's Rosneft 'Comfortable' With $70-$80 Oil Ahead of OPEC Talks
Alt Text

Europe Is Awash With Oil Stored On Ships

Bullish sentiment in markets makes…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Getting Around the US Crude Export Ban

Getting Around the US Crude Export Ban

Those who seek to get around the ban on most US crude exports that has been in place for four decades are reportedly eyeing the potential to export petroleum byproducts, or condensates, instead.

According to the Wall Street Journal, some 1 million barrels of the 8 million barrels of oil produced in the US every day are condensates, and while the rules ban exports of condensates that come directly out of the ground in liquid form, they don’t necessarily ban condensates that are stripped from natural gas at processing plants.

Today, we are seeing significantly more of these particular condensates flowing because of the boom in shale extraction from major plays like Bakken, Eagle Ford and Utica, among others. And the rational is that because this condensate plays only a very minor role in producing gasoline or diesel fuel, its export would not have much impact on consumer prices—as some fear lifting the crude export ban would.

Sandy Fielden, an analyst with RBN Energy consulting, told the WSJ that there is now more condensate than chemical plants and refineries can process, so there’s no reason it couldn’t be exported.  

According to Reuters, this is a “gray area”, but one that is “thought to stand a good chance of getting export approval”.

The news agency notes that “such condensates trade at a heavy discount to the benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude and global oil futures, meaning oil producers could make an economic case for exporting it.”

On 31 January, US Congress held its first hearing in nearly 25 years on crude oil exports, to “explore opportunities and challenges associated with lifting the ban on U.S. crude oil exports.”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who is leading the initiative, reiterated her call for President Obama to end the prohibition against exporting crude oil produced in the United States. “The prohibition on crude oil and condensate exports threatens record-breaking U.S. oil production and American jobs by creating inefficiencies, gluts, and other dislocations,” Murkowski said in her opening statement.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News