• 3 minutes Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 7 minutes Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 12 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 10 hours Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 2 hours Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 13 hours Tesla Closing a Dozen Solar Facilities in Nine States
  • 19 hours Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 9 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 13 hours Why is permian oil "locked in" when refineries abound?
  • 3 hours Oil prices going down
  • 11 hours EU Leaders Set To Prolong Russia Sanctions Again
  • 9 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 9 hours Oil Buyers Club
  • 13 hours EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 7 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 1 day Teapots Cut U.S. Oil Shipments
  • 19 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 36 mins Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 1 day Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
Alt Text

Europe Is Awash With Oil Stored On Ships

Bullish sentiment in markets makes…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

California Oil Bill Defeated

California Oil Bill Defeated

A landmark energy bill in California was watered down after facing significant opposition from the oil and gas industry.

The California legislature was considering a bill that would have slashed the state’s petroleum use by 50 percent by 2030, but the Democrats decided to drop the provision in order to keep the larger bill alive. After seeing the bill pass the State Senate earlier this year, the legislation ran up against a deadline this week for the end of session.

However, with strong opposition from the oil and gas industry, the State Assembly could not gather enough votes. “We could not cut through the million-dollar smokescreen created by a single special interest with a singular motive and a bottomless war chest,” Kevin de León, the leader of the Senate and the bill’s main sponsor, said following the defeat. Related: The Oil Bust Is Great For Business Here

But the petroleum industry welcomed the removal of the oil reduction provision. “Today's announcement was an acknowledgement that California's energy future, economic competitiveness, and environment are inextricably linked,” Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Association, said in a statement.

California’s Governor Jerry Brown vowed to not give up. “Oil has won the skirmish. But they've lost the bigger battle. Because I am more determined than ever,” he said after the provision was dropped. “I'm more determined than ever to making our regulatory regime work for the people of California, cleaning up the air, reducing the petroleum and creating the green jobs that will put hundreds of thousands of people to work over the coming decades.” Related: Does Selling Oil From The Strategic Petroleum Reserve Make Sense?

The bill, known as SB. 350, had three major provisions. First, it called for doubling the state’s energy efficiency in buildings by 2030. Second, it increased the state’s renewable portfolio standard, requiring California to source 50 percent of its electricity from renewable energy by 2030, up from the existing requirement of 33 percent by 2020. And third, it called for reducing the consumption of oil – mainly used in motor vehicles – by 50 percent by 2030. It was the latter provision that would have been the most difficult to achieve. It was also the most contentious. The oil reduction provision was dropped in order to salvage the other two objectives.

California has consistently pioneered environmental policy over the last several decades. And since it has such a large economy – if it were a country, it would have the eighth largest economy in the world – what it does tends to convince other states to follow suit. That is why SB. 350 has been hailed as critically important by its supporters and extremely costly by its detractors.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News