• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 6 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 5 days By Kellen McGovern Jones - "BlackRock Behind New TX-LA Offshore Wind Farm"
  • 12 days Natron Energy Achieves First-Ever Commercial-Scale Production of Sodium-Ion Batteries in the U.S.
  • 7 hours Solid State Lithium Battery Bank
  • 13 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 11 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
Kuwait Announces Massive Offshore Oil and Gas Discovery

Kuwait Announces Massive Offshore Oil and Gas Discovery

Kuwait's offshore oil discovery in…

Russian Oil Product Shipments Slipped in June

Russian Oil Product Shipments Slipped in June

Russian oil product shipments experienced…

Europe Increasingly Reliant on American Diesel

Europe Increasingly Reliant on American Diesel

European buyers are increasingly relying…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Biden’s Options To Counter OPEC+ Are Limited

  • Despite repeated requests from the Biden Administration not to cut oil production, OPEC+ went ahead and did just that.
  • The geopolitical rationale behind OPEC+’s move might be more worrying than the output cut itself.
  • Besides suspending deliveries of weapons to Saudi Arabia, there’s little that the U.S. can do to raise the pressure on the Kingdom.

This week, OPEC+ made a decision unprecedented in its history and the history of OPEC. The extended cartel approved production cuts of 2 million bpd at a time of steady demand, tight supply, and runway inflation in the world’s biggest economies.  More significantly, perhaps, OPEC+ made this decision despite Washington’s numerous attempts to change the mind of the cartel leaders, notably Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Just a day before the OPEC+ meeting, CNN reported that all available human resources in the administration had been mobilized, with the White House “having a spasm and panicking,” per one unnamed official.

Top officials such as Amos Hochstein and Janet Yellen had been tasked with talking the Saudis and the Emiratis out of a production cut. Talking points included a not too thinly veiled threat of reputational and foreign relations damage: “There is great political risk to your reputation and relations with the United States and the west if you move forward.” Yet the Saudis and the Emiratis did just that. They went forward.

Commentators were quick to note the move was a slap in the face of the United States and the collective West. It is the West that needs cheaper oil the most right now as the European Union embargoed Russian crude and fuels and the U.S. Democratic administration needs cheap gasoline ahead of the midterms to have a chance of retaining its party majority in Congress, however slim.

In a symbolic affirmation of a major geopolitical alignment change, the Saudi energy minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, accused Reuters of bad reporting and refused to answer questions from the agency at a news conference after the OPEC+ meeting and pretty much waved off suggestions by CNBC’s Hadley Gamble that OPEC+ was siding with Russia and weaponizing oil at a time when the global economy needed it.

Related: Is This The Next Major Threat For Oil Demand?

In short, OPEC+ bluntly demonstrated it can do whatever it feels it needs to do to protect its own interest, even if this means going against the interests of its traditional allies, including its biggest one.

As Bloomberg’s Javier Blas put it in a commentary piece after the meeting, “The US and its Western allies need to pay attention. For the first time in recent energy history, Washington, London, Paris and Berlin don’t have a single ally inside the OPEC+ group.”

One might argue that this tectonic change in geopolitics is more important for the future of the world than the war in Ukraine, although these are certainly not isolated from each other.

Saudi Arabia has already stated its desire to join the BRICS alliance in what can hardly be interpreted as anything less than a declaration of support for the Russia/China bloc. Its closest ally at home, the UAE, tends to follow Riyadh’s foreign policy, so it is on board with this distancing from the West and forging closing relations with a symbolic East and a very literal group that represents a substantial portion of global GDP.

So, the world’s largest oil producers after the U.S. are turning their backs on their once geopolitical friends and siding with the enemy, to put things bluntly and simply. That talking point for the Biden top team cited above may sound like a threat, but what specific form would that threat take?

So far, the response has been quite general. In an official statement, President Biden said on Wednesday that he was “disappointed by the shortsighted decision by OPEC+ to cut production quotas” and threatened to consider moves to “reduce OPEC’s control over energy prices.”

The only way to reduce OPEC’s control over energy prices would be to boost domestic production, but this is something Biden has vowed he will not do and even pledged to prevent. This, however, would leave even fewer options on the response table, such as the end of arms deliveries to Riyadh.

Indeed, some congressional Democrats have already called for a sharp reduction of arms deliveries to the Kingdom in response to the OPEC+ output reduction decision. Yet such a move would make the military-industrial complex quite unhappy with the White House, which would make such a decision difficult to sell.

Besides suspending deliveries of weapons to Saudi Arabia, there is the political pressure campaign approach, with some on social networks already joking that it’s only a matter of time before Washington begins noticing human rights abuse and the absence of democracy in the desert Kingdom.

Other than this, there is little Washington can do to “punish” Riyadh—OPEC’s leader and co-leader of OPEC+ along with Moscow—for the slap in the face. Sanctions would hardly be a smart decision given Saudi Arabia’s weight as an oil producer at a time when oil supply is short in the West. Coaxing didn’t work and seems unlikely to work going forward, at least for the time being.

It is beginning to look increasingly wise to sit this one out to avoid risking an even greater alienation with former allies that can do a lot of damage to the U.S. economy—and it won’t be reputational damage. After all, Saudi Arabia is the United States’ third-largest foreign supplier of crude.

Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Kris Poole on October 08 2022 said:
    The U.S. deserves NOT only slap in the face. It deserves some very significant spanking in the rear end as well. The U.S. under Biden Administration is the warmonger, the terrorist state (blowing up the Nord Stream 1/2 pipelines), and the world pariah sowing the chaos and destruction in every corner of the world. Now, this intellectually inept and virtue signaling woke leadership is trying to dictate Saudi and OPEC+ to open the spigot to flood the market with cheap oil and let the price go down even more, when the U.S at the same time is stifling their own production in the name of green ideology.
    I am sorry, but the U.S. should really get a taste of their own medicine. They cannot, and should not have it both ways. They want to exploit other countries resources and dictate them a price, while at the same time spreading the fear and green ideology of climate change. The whole world is slowly waking up and countries like China, Russia, India, Brazil, Iran and many others will not submit to the U.S. politics of terror, chaos and destruction.
  • Paul Wolf on October 09 2022 said:
    The article underestimates the leverage the US has over spare parts for the Saudi military, particularly its air force. I see this as a great opportunity to end the war in Yemen, anad maybe improve relations with Iran, another country we have no reason to hate.
  • Rick Kargaard on October 09 2022 said:
    The answer is obvious. North America needs to dump Biden and Trudeau and eliminate senseless energy policies.. We have all we need of economic, ethically produced fossil fuel right here.
    All it needs is an unequivocal green light to private investment.
    Quit demonizing an essential industry.
    If the climate is getting worse (which I doubt), it will continue to do so despite the puny efforts of the western democracies. Efforts that only serve to destroy our economies, our security, and our standard of living.
  • adam smith on October 10 2022 said:
    Biden will still be president after midterm. Saudi wont survive a week without US support. It has the worst army. Iran and Yemen will just run them over.
  • Ishowspeed suiii on October 10 2022 said:
    So lemme get this straight, biden vows to make saudi a pariah, shit talks their leader, releases a CIA report against him, talks about green energy and leaving fossil fuel to the past ( Saudi main source of income )
    And then expects the Saudis to help him and not look for their best interest? the economy of Saudi been in big deficits recently, they would love some extra cash

    But instead of asking foreign governments that you disrespected for help when you suddenly found out you need their help, maybe you should start with your own country first?
    The US companies are selling natural gas at 4x the price to EU, isn't that helping russia?
    or if the money is going to you then its fine?

    The options are indeed limited for them
    the US cannot escalate this, because if they do they'll be breaking the petrodollar deal not only from saudi arabia, but also every arab/muslim nation that is a close ally to saudi( UAE, kuwait for example)
  • Lexington Green on October 11 2022 said:
    *The* option will be next years (2023) all time high in oil production. OPEC will be unable to sustain a production cut.
  • One Second on October 11 2022 said:
    The answer is obvious and has been obvious for decades. The West must get rid of its world-destroying addiction to oil. Fortunately the West including the US has all the means to do this and quickly. It is the Saudis and other oil states who will be left in the dust and not the West.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News