• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 7 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 15 mins Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 8 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 10 days James Corbett Interviews Irina Slav of OILPRICE.COM - "Burn, Hollywood, Burn!" - The Corbett Report
Oil Moves Higher on Fuel Inventory Draws

Oil Moves Higher on Fuel Inventory Draws

WTI crude rallied above $86…

Standard Chartered Says Peak Oil Demand Is Not Imminent

Standard Chartered Says Peak Oil Demand Is Not Imminent

Standard Chartered has predicted global…

Big Oil Criticized for Falling Short of Net-Zero Goals

Big Oil Criticized for Falling Short of Net-Zero Goals

Climate Action 100+ criticizes Big…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

An Oil Supply Shock May Be Imminent

  • Oil demand has remained resilient in the face of a multitude of challenges.
  • OPEC+ has fallen behind more than 3.5 million bpd on its output goals.
  • The DoE has no immediate plans to start refilling the SPR.
  • The risk of a supply shock grows as China's economy re-opens while Russian oil is being forced off the market.

When the chief executive of Aramco said earlier this week that years of underinvestment had damaged the balance between supply and demand in the oil market, it should have been a wake-up call to those in decision-making positions. Instead, the secretary-general of the UN bashed the oil industry once again for “feasting” on record-high profits and urged governments to make them pay for this.

Meanwhile, OPEC’s production shortfall last month reached 3.58 million bpd—a figure equal to some 3.5 percent of global demand—and the United States continued to sell oil from its strategic petroleum reserve.

These seemingly unrelated news reports do have something very important in common. Both clearly suggest a supply shortfall on a global level is imminent. Throw in the news that Russia’s oil exports could fall by some 2.4 million bpd after the EU embargo enters into effect in December, and an oil shortage becomes more or less unavoidable.

Oil demand has remained resilient in the face of a multitude of challenges, and even prices of over $100 per barrel failed to curb it in any significant way earlier this year. Now, prices are somewhat tempered, but the embargo is still about two months away. Once this kicks in, prices are bound to jump because alternative supply is limited. And the U.S. will need to start refilling its SPR at some point because it is getting depleted.

The Wall Street Journal sounded the alarm on that problem this week. Author Jinjoo Lee cited the Energy Information Administration as saying the inventory level at the SPR had declined by another 7 million barrels in the week to September 16, meaning the total was 427 million barrels. And this number was the lowest SPR inventory level since 1984. It is also the first time there is less oil in the SPR than in commercial storage, Lee noted.

Related: Poland Now Has Enough Natural Gas And Coal Supply For Winter

Perhaps worse is the fact that the administration has no plans to start replenishing the SPR anytime soon. In a report from earlier this month, the Department of Energy denied a report by Bloomberg that it was waiting for oil prices to dip below $80 per barrel to start refilling the SPR.

This suggests the DoE has no immediate plans to start filling up the SPR, and this is a cause for worry because oil supply shocks tend not to be obvious until they become painfully so. And a supply shock is definitely coming to Europe if the U.S. is not there to help. Add to this the moderate growth in U.S. oil production and statements by industry executives that U.S. won’t be able to bail Europe out with oil or gas, and the situation becomes quite bleak.

Meanwhile, as the EU begins discussions of a price cap on Russian oil, in addition to the embargo, U.S. senators are pushing for increased sanction pressure on the buyers of Russian crude to make sure the other price cap, the one agreed to by the G7, works. If either of these latest efforts ends with a decision to take action, there should be little doubt that Russia will respond just as it said it would respond: no oil sales for price cappers. And this means even less oil to go around.

It seems many in positions of power are oblivious to this threat. In fact, in a congressional hearing this week, Rep. Rashida Tlaib asked the heads of the biggest U.S. banks whether they had already devised a strategy for exiting oil and gas investments as a whole. The question suggests that the latest supply and demand—and price—developments have escaped Rep. Tlaib’s attention just like they have escaped Antonio Guterres’ attention.

The answer that JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon gave to Rep. Tlaib’s question at the Wednesday hearing, however, is one for the books. “That would be the road to hell for America,” Dimon said in what is perhaps the bluntest assertion yet that economies run on oil and gas, and they will continue to run on oil and gas for many more decades, whatever direction the energy transition takes.

The evidence is right there under all our noses: Europe. For all its efforts to convert to the lowest emitter in the world—which it did for a while—Europe thrived not on cheap solar and wind but on cheap gas and abundant oil. Now that these are gone, European economies are beginning to fall apart.


Avoiding a supply shock in oil would be difficult in the current circumstances. The OPEC+ shortfall is not all a result of conscious action. In fact, most of it is not, and this means it would be almost impossible to make up for. And the U.S. can’t afford to continue drawing on its SPR for much longer without doing something in the replenishment department. It’s called strategic for a reason, after all.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on September 26 2022 said:
    An oil supply shock may not only be imminent but also inevitable given the tightness of the global oil market, the continued resilience of oil demand and the ever-shrinking global spare oil production capacity including OPEC+’s. The underlying cause is of course global
    underinvestment in the expansion of oil production. The same could be said about the global gas market.

    Underinvestment has been on the rise since the end of 2019 prompted by COVID-19, the hasty policies of the EU to accelerate energy transition to renewables at the expense of fossil fuels, the call by the International Energy Agency (IEA) to halt any new investments in oil and gas (later reversed) and incessant pressure by environmental activists on the global oil industry to divest its oil and gas assets and keep oil and gas underground.

    Neither OPEC+ nor US shale oil production can boost production shortly. Both Saudi Arabia and UAE are already producing at maximum while other OPEC+ members aren’t in a position to raise production. Shale oil is a spent force. My estimate of US oil production including shale oil doesn’t exceed 9.5-10.0 million barrels a day (mbd). And while the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) will continue to provide highly exaggerated figures about US production, rising US oil imports contradict such claims.

    Data from the US Department of Energy (DOE) showed that the US strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) has fallen to 427 million barrels (mb) of crude oil in the week to September 16, the lowest since 1984. In such circumstances, the DOE might find it extremely difficult to replace the released SPR totalling 240 mbd.

    Another contributing factor is the talk about banning Russian oil exports and capping the price of Russian crude. Such proposals are doomed to fail miserably since Russia will immediately halt supplies to any country agreeing the cap. This could send Brent crude beyond $115-$120 a barrel thus hastening an oil supply shock.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert
  • Hugh Williams on September 29 2022 said:
    Considering the role that avoiding more CO2 pollution has had in causing the oil and NG shortage why don’t we look at this phantom. Dr. Steven E. Koonin, a very experienced scientist in climate change, has written a book UNSETTLED-WHAT CLIMATE SCIENCE TELLS US, WHAT IT DOESN´T, AND WHY IT MATTERS. In his book I find these points most interesting.
    (1) None of the computer programs developed so far can duplicate what climate changes have already happened yet are used to predict the future.
    (2) We are nearing the end of a 125,000 year climate cycle. At the end of the last cycle the sea level was six meters higher than now. So the argument that we have caused a never before high sea level falls flat. Our sea level is rising at the rate os 3 mm per year.(1 ft in a century.)
    (3) For years NASA measured the energy being radiated from the earth and detected no decrease. A greenhouse effect would require a decrease.
    (4) Most of the blockage of heat leaving the earth comes from water vapour. CO2 is a minor factor and if the CO2 doubles the effect would be hardly noticeable.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News