• 3 minutes In a Nutshell...
  • 5 minutes CV19: New York 21% infection rate + 40% Existing T-Cell immunity = 61% = Herd Immunity ?
  • 7 minutes Australian renewables zone attracts 27 GW of solar, wind, battery proposals
  • 9 minutes Why Oil could hit $100
  • 19 mins COVID is real now
  • 2 hours The Quad naval alliance forming.
  • 2 hours The Grey Lady has fallen (further into irrelevancy)
  • 10 hours Is The Three Gorges Dam on the Brink of Collapse?
  • 1 day Where is Alberta, Canada headed?
  • 2 hours During March, April, May the states with the highest infections/deaths were NY, NJ, Ma. . . . . Today (June) the three have the best numbers. How ? Herd immunity ?
  • 4 hours The Boris Yeltsin of America
  • 2 days Why Putin is popular in Russia
  • 14 hours Is the oil & gas industry on the way out?
  • 1 day Joe Biden offers advice to correct the public health
  • 1 day There Has Been No Trump Manufacturing Boom Even Before Covid
  • 2 days Fauci: "USA will soon have 100K new cases per day". Trump re(p)-lies: "The problem has been fixed"
Dan Dicker

Dan Dicker

Dan Dicker is a 25 year veteran of the New York Mercantile Exchange where he traded crude oil, natural gas, unleaded gasoline and heating oil…

More Info

A Company that Stands to do Well from the Collapsing WTI-Brent Spread

Another week away from my usual trading desk in New York does lead to a different and useful perspective on energy events without concentrating on the minute movements on my screens, specifically concerning Hess (HES) and PBF Energy (PBF) – both of which I’ve been thinking about.

Here at this small conference on the West coast where I’ve had a chance to talk to a few different voices in the middle of the energy space, there are a few brewing stories that I’ve gotten some interesting and intelligent views – and might even lead to an investment idea.

First is an update on a call I made correctly in WTI-Brent oil spreads which have quickly collapsed in: to close to $7 dollars this week.  I made clear in recent columns that this spread move would do two things:  give a false positive move to domestic WTI prices, hiking them closer to $100 a barrel, and deliver some bad news to refiners, particularly those in the mid-continent, which have benefited from wide margins for much of the last two years.  On crude prices, the $100 WTI price should not be seen as a necessary prelude to $4 a gallon gas, but merely domestic grades ‘catching up’ to the global prices that have been not just steady, but in fact weakening for the past 2 quarters – a ‘fake’ rally, if you will.  Second, there have been a few energy guys here who have tried to convince me that the quick drop in the WTI/Brent spread is more…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News