X

Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!

ERROR

  • 4 minutes IMPORTANT ARTICLE BY OILPRICE.COM EDITOR - "Naked Short Selling: The Truth Is Much Worse Than You Have Been Told"
  • 5 minutes “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 7 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 19 mins Texas forced to have rolling black outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 12 hours Wednesday Nikki Haley reached out to Trump for meeting at Mar-a-lago. Trump said No ! You blew it Nikki . . .
  • 18 hours NYT:  The Supreme Court’s order (Re:  Trump’s tax returns) set in motion a series of events that could lead to the startling possibility of a criminal trial of a former U.S. president
  • 2 hours The World Economic Forum & Davos - Setting the agenda on fossil fuels, global regulations, etc.
  • 4 hours Retired RAF pilot wins legal challenge over a wind farm
  • 21 hours The latest GOP nonsense on Texas shows us the future Republicans want
  • 2 hours Minerals, Mining and Industrial Ecology
  • 20 hours Disaster looming in UK offshore wind power
  • 1 day The Cyberpandemic has Begun: SolarWinds + FireEye – Gmail & Google services down
  • 22 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
2020 Will Be A Brutal Year For Coal

2020 Will Be A Brutal Year For Coal

After having entered in structural…

Why China Can’t Quit Its Coal Addiction

Why China Can’t Quit Its Coal Addiction

Despite China’s grand announcement that…

Coal Production On The Rise Despite Coronavirus Crisis

Coal Production On The Rise Despite Coronavirus Crisis

Despite massive disruptions caused by…

Alexis Arthur

Alexis Arthur

Alexis Arthur is energy policy associate at the Institute of the Americas, a think tank on Western Hemisphere Affairs based in La Jolla, Calif. She…

More Info

Premium Content

Coal Is Doomed Even If It Wins Against EPA In Courts

The controversy over the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan has become the latest chapter in the chronicle of President Obama’s so-called ‘war on coal’. The plan promises many things, chief among them the health and climate benefits accrued by switching to cleaner burning fuels. But a case before the DC Circuit Court has the potential to derail the plan before it even comes into effect, with implications for US coal producers and the national clean energy debate.

The new regulations have their critics, led by coal companies and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R- KY), who has personally urged the nation’s 50 governors to ignore the rules. While this may seem like just another example of partisan politics, the latest case, if successful, could seriously curtail the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) powers. A victory for coal would be a blow for the environmental lobby and the federal government.

The dispute over the Clean Power Plan centers on its proposal to cut pollution from power plants by assigning tough emissions reductions targets on a state-by-state basis. The goal is to reduce carbon pollution from the power sector by 30 percent by 2030 from 2005 levels. Existing coal-fired plants, as the biggest polluters, will be the most affected. Opponents argue that the federal government is overreaching its regulatory authority prescribed under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The EPA is expected to release the final rules midsummer this year. Related: How Much Longer Can The Oil Age Last?

In the meantime, the first battle took place in the courts. The DC Circuit Court agreed to hear a case brought by Murray Energy against the EPA, which has the support of coal producers and 14 coal-reliant states, led by West Virginia and Michigan. Arguments against the plan include loss of jobs, rising household power bills, and a failure to consider the costs of compliance and unfairness of placing this financial burden on a few entities. 13 states and the District of Columbia responded by filing a petition in support of the EPA’s plan. The judges did not appear keen to weigh in on a rule that hasn’t yet been finalized.

Proponents of the Clean Power Plan have released findings that underscore the benefits of the rules. An independent study found that the proposals could prevent thousands of deaths per year from respiratory illness and heart attack as a direct result of improved air quality. Related: Which Nation Just Became The World's Top Crude Importer?

For all the bombast, the latest regulations are only one factor contributing to the decline of the once ubiquitous coal plants in the United States. The dramatic rise in shale gas production has seen cheap natural gas catch up to coal in power generation. The declining cost of solar panels and state-led incentives to increase renewable energy sources in the power mix are also having an effect.

The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) predicts that without major policy changes, coal-fired generation will remain fairly flat between now and 2040, dropping from 39 percent to 34 percent. However, this scenario does not include the consequences of the Clean Power Plan coming into effect, which the EIA anticipates will have a significant impact on coal use.

BP’s 2035 energy outlook may get a little closer to this case. The company expects coal’s contribution to North America’s electricity mix to decline by 2.9 percent per year in the coming two decades, falling to 18 percent by 2035, the lowest level on record. Related: California’s Climate Goals: Realistic Or Just Wishful Thinking?

If the case against the EPA’s Clean Power Plan is successful and coal somehow makes a comeback, the US would be bucking global trends. Coal, which was the fastest growing fuel between 2000 and 2013, is now expected to be the slowest growing fuel over the next two decades. Much of this is due to negative growth in OECD countries.

The threat against coal in the United States is far greater than President Obama’s pen. Coal has already lost its main advantage – cost effectiveness – and the national sentiment is clear. A short term win for coal companies and coal states may extend the life of some plants in the United States. The win could still have serious implications in terms of limiting the EPA’s authority and would certainly be a slap in the face for the Clean Power Plan’s proponents.

But ultimately it would be unable to reverse the national and global movement towards cleaner-burning and increasingly affordable energy alternatives over the coming decade.

By Alexis Arthur of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Tim on May 20 2015 said:
    "...The national sentiment is clear." What does this mean? The author needs to speak with the millions of people in this country who understand the importance of coal to national security and economic wellbeing. The reason coal is becoming not cost-effective is impacted by natural gas development, but also increased subsidies to solar, wind, etc, but even more so by the crushing EPA regulations. Again, another governmental agency dictating what must be done, whether or not the technology exists to do it, and without consideration to the negative impact on well-paying jobs and inexpensive energy. It's par for the course with an administration which wants for America to fail. We will doom ourselves in our ultimate reliance on unproven and non-self sustaining energy sources. Bank on that.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News