• 2 hours Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 4 hours Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 6 hours Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 9 hours Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 10 hours TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 12 hours Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 19 hours Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 24 hours Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 1 day Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 1 day Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 1 day OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 1 day Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 1 day Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 2 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 2 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 2 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 2 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 2 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 2 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 2 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 2 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 3 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 3 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 3 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 3 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 3 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 3 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 3 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 4 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 4 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 4 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 4 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 4 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 4 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 4 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 4 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 5 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 7 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 7 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 7 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
Alt Text

Federal Regulators Deal Huge Blow To The Coal Industry

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission…

Alt Text

The Death Of Europe’s Coal Industry

A recent report suggests that…

Coal - Cheap Fuel Or Environmental Catastrophe?

Coal - Cheap Fuel Or Environmental Catastrophe?

Over recent years, as oil prices have surged exponentially, we’ve witnesses a renewed interest in coal as a readily available, reliably abundant and relatively inexpensive source of energy. These benefits have reawakened a debate over the possible revival of a fuel that was pretty much officially “dead and buried!”

Particularly interested in the outcome of this discussion is the “Coal Industry” itself, as concerns about “Peak Oil” and astronomically rising prices re-ignites serious reexamination of coal as a potential “stop gap” savior.

Theoretically, coal has several notable benefits to be considered. Coal is extremely combustible and it produces a tremendous amount of energy upon ignition. Compared to alternative sources of energy, coal is dramatically inexpensive due to exceptionally large and relatively easy to reach reserves found all around the globe. These qualities played a major role in coal serving the “Industrial Revolution” as its primary fuel powering locomotives across the great divide and generating the very first mass electricity to bring light into a previously darkened world!

Coal Power Plants

In comparison to nuclear and hydroelectric, coal power plants can be inexpensively built practically anywhere, transportation of coal is simple, inexpensive does not require the maintenance and continual upkeep of high-pressure pipelines or extensive security when in route.

Coal is also amazingly versatile and can be used for everything from barbecuing dinner to fueling a steam generator. And it’s for this reason, many energy experts predict that rising oil prices and progressively limited supply of oil reserves may well lead to more consistent reliance on coal. Coal is currently relied upon for a mere 30% of our primary energy consumption, but in a pinch, could quite easily; once again surge to over 50% of the world’s fuel supply.

Worldwide reserves of coal are estimated, based on current usage rates, to be re reliably plentiful for at least another 200 years. Coal is far less costly to extract from the earth than oil and a lot less dangerous should some mishap occur, accidentally or on purpose, in comparison to nuclear power.
Coal reserves are naturally spread far more equitably throughout the world than oil, meaning far less complications and cost distributing the fuel. It can be safely stored and quickly drawn upon in times of emergency and is not affected by weather conditions like wind or solar power.
However, coal is also a very dirty fuel offering up “less bang for your buck” per cubic unit of fuel. To try to rectify this problem the coal industry has been experimenting with a technology that is called “Gasification,” which captures and confines CO2. This Carbon Dioxide can then be injected into oil wells to improve their hydrocarbon recovery rate, as well as be used to produce hydrogen for fuel cells.

Sadly, hope, theory and experimentation does not change the fact that currently, burning coal as a fuel releases tremendous amounts of carbon dioxide, which damages the environment and is gradually depleting our ozone layer, while contributing to global warming.

Therefore, if we were to dramatically increase our reliance on coal as a viable substitute for oil, we would automatically be doubling and in some cases tripling the dangerous toxins released into our eco-system, including: Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxide, Mercury and Sulfur Dioxide, the cause of “Acid Rain.”

So how much of “these poisons” is “too much?” according to scientists, the mercury alone produced at the average coal plant annually would be 2,600 times the amount it would take to make any fish living in a local, “50 acre lake” absolutely unsafe for human or animal consumption.

Meanwhile, building a coal power plant kills off thousands of oxygen producing plants and trees that also feed the numerous species of living creatures that are uprooted from their home. Besides polluting the water the plant also needs to use nearly 2.5 billion gallons of water to help ensure that it runs cool and safely. That’s enough water to support 250,000 people annually.

Nature is extremely important, but what really strikes home is the human cost! The mining and burning of coal directly leads to numerous dangers and deaths associated with cave-ins, collapses, poisonings and explosions as well as such maladies as tuberculosis, black lung disease, emphysema, asthma and various circulatory and respiratory diseases, eye, ear, nose and throat irritations and skin rashes.

While the idea of Gasification sounds great, it is still a largely untested and unproven “theory” and the research, experimentation and eventual retrofits and upgrades will add billions to the cost of using coal for energy, long before we begin to see these prophesied benefits effectively come into play. Therefore we can’t allow ourselves to discount the fact that coal, just like oil, is NOT a renewable energy and is itself, in a continuous state of consistent depletion.

So the jury is still out with regards to how much we can actually come to truly rely on coal to replace oil as a primary source of energy. Even if gasification were to work as well as hoped for, could we ever really bring ourselves to revert back to coal like we did in the past and would our efforts not be better served discovering even better ways to more effectively and cleanly use oil or other advancing alternative fuel sources? One thing is for sure, only time will tell.

Visit our homepage for the latest oil prices and energy news.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News